148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35020791)
1. The Clinical Significance of Perineural Invasion by Prostate Cancer on Needle Core Biopsy: Involvement of Single Versus Multiple Sextant Sites.
Bell PD; Teramoto Y; Gurung PMS; Numbere N; Yang Z; Miyamoto H
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Oct; 146(10):1252-1257. PubMed ID: 35020791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical Significance of Perineural Invasion by Prostate Cancer Detected on Needle Core Biopsy.
Teramoto Y; Numbere N; Wang Y; Miyamoto H
Am J Clin Pathol; 2023 Feb; 159(2):116-119. PubMed ID: 36494055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Limited Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate on Needle Core Biopsy.
Bell PD; Teramoto Y; Gurung PMS; Yang Z; Miyamoto H
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Apr; 146(4):469-477. PubMed ID: 35020802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical significance of perineural invasion by prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy.
Suresh N; Teramoto Y; Goto T; Wang Y; Miyamoto H
Hum Pathol; 2022 Mar; 121():65-72. PubMed ID: 35063445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Grade Group Underestimation in Prostate Biopsy: Predictive Factors and Outcomes in Candidates for Active Surveillance.
Audenet F; Rozet F; Resche-Rigon M; Bernard R; Ingels A; Prapotnich D; Sanchez-Salas R; Galiano M; Barret E; Cathelineau X
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Dec; 15(6):e907-e913. PubMed ID: 28522288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Percentage of Gleason pattern 4 and tumor volume predict adverse pathological stage and margin status at radical prostatectomy in grade Group 2 and grade Group 3 prostate cancers.
Iakymenko OA; Lugo I; Briski LM; Nemov I; Punnen S; Kwon D; Pollack A; Stoyanova R; Parekh DJ; Jorda M; Gonzalgo ML; Kryvenko ON
Prostate; 2021 Sep; 81(12):866-873. PubMed ID: 34184782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Questioning the Status Quo: Should Gleason Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer be Considered a "Negative Core" in Pre-Radical Prostatectomy Risk Nomograms? An International Multicenter Analysis.
Leong JY; Herrera-Caceres JO; Goldberg H; Tham E; Teplitsky S; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ; Lallas CD; Fleshner NE; Tilki D; Chandrasekar T
Urology; 2020 Mar; 137():102-107. PubMed ID: 31705947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The clinical predictive factors and postoperative histopathological parameters associated with upgrading after radical prostatectomy: A contemporary analysis with grade groups.
Erdem S; Verep S; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Prostate; 2020 Feb; 80(2):225-234. PubMed ID: 31794085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical outcome comparison of Grade Group 1 and Grade Group 2 prostate cancer with and without cribriform architecture at the time of radical prostatectomy.
Hollemans E; Verhoef EI; Bangma CH; Rietbergen J; Roobol MJ; Helleman J; van Leenders GJLH
Histopathology; 2020 Apr; 76(5):755-762. PubMed ID: 31944367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Metastatic potential to regional lymph nodes with Gleason score ≤7, including tertiary pattern 5, at radical prostatectomy.
Diolombi ML; Epstein JI
BJU Int; 2017 Jun; 119(6):872-878. PubMed ID: 27496532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of pathological and oncological outcomes based on extended prostate biopsy results in patients with prostate cancer receiving radical prostatectomy: a single institution study.
Ishizaki F; Hara N; Koike H; Kawaguchi M; Tadokoro A; Takizawa I; Nishiyama T; Takahashi K; Hohenfellner R
Diagn Pathol; 2012 Jun; 7():68. PubMed ID: 22697234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PIN-like (Ductal) Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate.
Paulk A; Giannico G; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Dec; 42(12):1693-1700. PubMed ID: 30138215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate biopsy perineural invasion is not independently associated with positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Ristau BT; Tomaszewski JJ; Chen YF; Bertolet M; Woldemichael E; Nelson JB
World J Urol; 2015 Sep; 33(9):1269-74. PubMed ID: 25366883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Significance of extraprostatic extension by Grade Groups 1-3 prostatic carcinoma on needle biopsy.
Zhao J; Epstein J
Prostate; 2023 Jun; 83(8):809-813. PubMed ID: 36946608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic significance of perineural invasion in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.
Dell'Atti L
J BUON; 2016; 21(5):1219-1223. PubMed ID: 27837626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Gleason pattern 4 in radical prostatectomy specimens in current practice - Quantification, morphology and concordance with biopsy.
de Souza MF; de Azevedo Araujo ALC; da Silva MT; Athanazio DA
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2018 Jun; 34():13-17. PubMed ID: 29661718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pre-diagnosis urine exosomal RNA (ExoDx EPI score) is associated with post-prostatectomy pathology outcome.
Kretschmer A; Tutrone R; Alter J; Berg E; Fischer C; Kumar S; Torkler P; Tadigotla V; Donovan M; Sant G; Skog J; Noerholm M
World J Urol; 2022 Apr; 40(4):983-989. PubMed ID: 35084544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How Much Reliable Is the Current Belief on Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer?
Chung MS; Choi YJ; Lee YS; Yoon BI; Ha US
Pathol Oncol Res; 2021; 27():629489. PubMed ID: 34257593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Biopsy prostate cancer perineural invasion and tumour load are associated with positive posterolateral margins at radical prostatectomy: implications for planning of nerve-sparing surgery.
van der Slot MA; Remmers S; Kweldam CF; den Bakker MA; Nieboer D; Busstra MB; Gan M; Klaver S; Rietbergen JBW; van Leenders GJLH;
Histopathology; 2023 Sep; 83(3):348-356. PubMed ID: 37140551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical impact of perineural invasion encircled completely vs. incompletely by prostate cancer on needle core biopsy.
Nwanze J; Teramoto Y; Wang Y; Miyamoto H
Hum Pathol; 2024 Jan; 143():71-74. PubMed ID: 38135063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
