These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35023868)

  • 21. Cartilage-sparing complete otoplasty technique: a 10-year experience in 100 patients.
    Burstein FD
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Jul; 14(4):521-5. PubMed ID: 12867867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of otoplasty outcomes using different types of suture materials.
    Maslauskas K; Astrauskas T; Viksraitis S; Samsanavidius D
    Int Surg; 2010; 95(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 20480848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Surgical correction of constricted ear combined with Stahl's ear.
    Bi Y; Lin L; Yang Q; Pan B; Zhao Y; He L; Jiang H
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Jul; 68(7):895-901. PubMed ID: 25921912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The value of head dressings in the postoperative management of the prominent ear.
    Powell BW
    Br J Plast Surg; 1989 Nov; 42(6):692-4. PubMed ID: 2605406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A simplified method for correcting Tanzer's group II constricted ears: Construction of the superior crus as a strut with cartilage expansion grafting.
    Kim YS; Chung S
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Apr; 69(4):e71-6. PubMed ID: 26922051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of two incisionless otoplasty techniques for prominent ears in children.
    Haytoglu S; Haytoglu TG; Bayar Muluk N; Kuran G; Arikan OK
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Apr; 79(4):504-10. PubMed ID: 25650142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cartilage-sparing techniques versus percutaneous adjustable closed otoplasty for prominent ear deformity.
    Ozturan O; Dogan R; Eren SB; Aksoy F; Veyseller B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 May; 25(3):752-7. PubMed ID: 24777022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Correction of the protruding ear with a modified anterior scoring technique.
    Lazaridis N; Tilaveridis I; Dimitrakopoulos I; Karakasis D
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Mar; 56(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 9496841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of Cartilage Scoring in Correction of Prominent Ear with Incisionless Otoplasty Technique in Pediatric Patients.
    Haytoğlu S; Haytoğlu TG; Kuran G; Yıldırım İ; Arıkan OK
    J Int Adv Otol; 2017 Apr; 13(1):21-27. PubMed ID: 27810844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Effectiveness of modified method for cup ear deformity].
    Liu Q; You X; Zhang J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Dec; 26(12):1482-5. PubMed ID: 23316641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ear reconstruction following severe complications of otoplasty.
    Firmin F; Sanger C; O'Toole G
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008; 61 Suppl 1():S13-20. PubMed ID: 18805745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of Cartilage-Scoring and Cartilage-Sparing Otoplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of Complications and Aesthetic Outcome of 1060 Ears.
    Smittenberg MN; Marsman M; Veeger NJGM; Moues CM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Apr; 141(4):500e-506e. PubMed ID: 29595722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Do combined otoplasty techniques really improve the surgical outcomes for prominent ear correction in adult patients?
    Orabona GD; Salzano G; Maglitto F; Seidita F; Abbate V; Califano L
    Ann Ital Chir; 2018; 89():157-161. PubMed ID: 29848816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Question mark ear deformity and a modified surgical correction method: a case report.
    Vayvada H; Karaca C; Menderes A; Yilmaz M
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2005; 29(4):251-4; discussion 255. PubMed ID: 16044239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Otoplasty: evaluation, technique, and review.
    Kelley P; Hollier L; Stal S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Sep; 14(5):643-53. PubMed ID: 14501322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Complications following correction of prominent ears: an audit review of 122 cases.
    Jeffery SL
    Br J Plast Surg; 1999 Oct; 52(7):588-90. PubMed ID: 10658116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Partial anterior chondrotomy in the correction of prominent ears. Apropos of 140 re-examined cases].
    Jammet P; Atlan G; Cisotto J; Souyris F
    Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 1992 Mar; 37(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 1456719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Experience of correction of prominent ears.
    Jinguang Z; Leren H; Hongxing Z
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Sep; 21(5):1578-80. PubMed ID: 20856052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Antihelical shaping of prominent ears using conchal cartilage-grafting adhesion.
    Park C; Jeong TW
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Jun; 122(6):1238-45. PubMed ID: 22549915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The modified converse technique in combination with cavum rotation.
    Mattheis S; Siegert R
    Facial Plast Surg; 2004 Nov; 20(4):271-5. PubMed ID: 15778914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.