177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35024781)
21. Assessment of Uptake Appropriateness of Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer Screening According to Patients Meeting Eligibility Criteria of the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Liu Y; Pan IE; Tak HJ; Vlahos I; Volk R; Shih YT
JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Nov; 5(11):e2243163. PubMed ID: 36409492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. 5-year overall survival in patients with lung cancer eligible or ineligible for screening according to US Preventive Services Task Force criteria: a prospective, observational cohort study.
Luo YH; Luo L; Wampfler JA; Wang Y; Liu D; Chen YM; Adjei AA; Midthun DE; Yang P
Lancet Oncol; 2019 Aug; 20(8):1098-1108. PubMed ID: 31255490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of the sensitivity of different criteria to select lung cancer patients for screening in a cohort of German patients.
Walter J; Kauffmann-Guerrero D; Muley T; Reck M; Fuge J; Günther A; Majeed RW; Savai R; Koch I; Dinkel J; Schneider C; Senghas K; Kobinger S; Manapov F; Thomas M; Kahnert K; Winter H; Behr J; Tammemägi M; Tufman A
Cancer Med; 2023 Apr; 12(7):8880-8896. PubMed ID: 36707972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of the 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation for Lung Cancer Screening.
Toumazis I; de Nijs K; Cao P; Bastani M; Munshi V; Ten Haaf K; Jeon J; Gazelle GS; Feuer EJ; de Koning HJ; Meza R; Kong CY; Han SS; Plevritis SK
JAMA Oncol; 2021 Dec; 7(12):1833-1842. PubMed ID: 34673885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Lung Cancer Screening in Brazil Comparing the 2013 and 2021 USPSTF Guidelines.
Emmerick ICM; Campos MR; Castanheira D; Muzy J; Marques A; Arueira Chaves L; Sobreira da Silva MJ
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Dec; 6(12):e2346994. PubMed ID: 38079172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Economic impact of using risk models for eligibility selection to the International lung screening Trial.
Cressman S; Weber MF; Ngo PJ; Wade S; Behar Harpaz S; Caruana M; Tremblay A; Manser R; Stone E; Atkar-Khattra S; Karikios D; Ho C; Fernandes A; Yi Weng J; McWilliams A; Myers R; Mayo J; Yee J; Yuan R; Marshall HM; Fong KM; Lam S; Canfell K; Tammemägi MC
Lung Cancer; 2023 Feb; 176():38-45. PubMed ID: 36592498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Methods for Using Race and Ethnicity in Prediction Models for Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility.
Landy R; Gomez I; Caverly TJ; Kawamoto K; Rivera MP; Robbins HA; Young CD; Chaturvedi AK; Cheung LC; Katki HA
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Sep; 6(9):e2331155. PubMed ID: 37721755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A Comparative Modeling Analysis of Risk-Based Lung Cancer Screening Strategies.
Ten Haaf K; Bastani M; Cao P; Jeon J; Toumazis I; Han SS; Plevritis SK; Blom EF; Kong CY; Tammemägi MC; Feuer EJ; Meza R; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2020 May; 112(5):466-479. PubMed ID: 31566216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Black Race Remains Associated with Lower Eligibility for Screening Using 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations Among Lung Cancer Patients at an Urban Safety Net Hospital.
Liu A; Siddiqi N; Tapan U; Mak KS; Steiling KA; Suzuki K
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities; 2023 Dec; 10(6):2836-2843. PubMed ID: 36441493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Revisiting the lung cancer screening eligibility criteria to promote equity for Black individuals.
Gudina AT; Kamen C; Hardy SJ; Kehoe L; Culakova E; Cupertino AP
Lung Cancer; 2024 May; 191():107539. PubMed ID: 38552545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Performance of Risk Factor-Based Guidelines and Model-Based Chest CT Lung Cancer Screening in World Trade Center-Exposed Fire Department Rescue/Recovery Workers.
Cleven KL; Vaeth B; Zeig-Owens R; Colbeth HL; Jaber N; Schwartz T; Weiden MD; Markowitz SB; Silvestri GA; Prezant DJ
Chest; 2021 May; 159(5):2060-2071. PubMed ID: 33279511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Potential Impact of Criteria Modifications on Race and Sex Disparities in Eligibility for Lung Cancer Screening.
Smeltzer MP; Liao W; Faris NR; Fehnel C; Goss J; Shepherd CJ; Ramos R; Qureshi T; Mukhopadhyay A; Ray MA; Osarogiagbon RU
J Thorac Oncol; 2023 Feb; 18(2):158-168. PubMed ID: 36208717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Using Prediction Models to Reduce Persistent Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Draft 2020 USPSTF Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines.
Landy R; Young CD; Skarzynski M; Cheung LC; Berg CD; Rivera MP; Robbins HA; Chaturvedi AK; Katki HA
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2021 Nov; 113(11):1590-1594. PubMed ID: 33399825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Development and Validation of a Multivariable Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model That Includes Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening Results: A Secondary Analysis of Data From the National Lung Screening Trial.
Tammemägi MC; Ten Haaf K; Toumazis I; Kong CY; Han SS; Jeon J; Commins J; Riley T; Meza R
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e190204. PubMed ID: 30821827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Abrogation of survival disparity between Black and White individuals after the USPSTF's 2012 prostate-specific antigen-based prostate cancer screening recommendation.
Kim IE; Jang TL; Kim S; Modi PK; Singer EA; Elsamra SE; Kim IY
Cancer; 2020 Dec; 126(23):5114-5123. PubMed ID: 32888321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Do the 2013 United States Preventive Services Task Force guidelines for lung cancer screening fail high-risk African American smokers? An institutional retrospective observational cohort study.
Thurlapati A; Velez-Martinez CS; Hirani S; Abad J; Shi R; Beedupalli K; Mansour RP
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2021 Sep; 30(5):375-381. PubMed ID: 34010237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Blood-Based Biomarker Panel for Personalized Lung Cancer Risk Assessment.
Fahrmann JF; Marsh T; Irajizad E; Patel N; Murage E; Vykoukal J; Dennison JB; Do KA; Ostrin E; Spitz MR; Lam S; Shete S; Meza R; Tammemägi MC; Feng Z; Hanash SM
J Clin Oncol; 2022 Mar; 40(8):876-883. PubMed ID: 34995129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility.
Narayan AK; Chowdhry DN; Fintelmann FJ; Little BP; Shepard JO; Flores EJ
Radiology; 2021 Dec; 301(3):712-720. PubMed ID: 34546133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Risk prediction models versus simplified selection criteria to determine eligibility for lung cancer screening: an analysis of German federal-wide survey and incidence data.
Hüsing A; Kaaks R
Eur J Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 35(10):899-912. PubMed ID: 32594286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Proportion of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients that Would Have Been Eligible for Lung Cancer Screening.
Wu GX; Goldstein L; Kim JY; Raz DJ
Clin Lung Cancer; 2016 Sep; 17(5):e131-e139. PubMed ID: 26872765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
