These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35024932)

  • 1. Underwater versus conventional cold snare polypectomy of colorectal polyps 4-9 mm in diameter: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Myung YS; Kwon H; Han J; Lim J; Choi SY; Baeg MK; Han SW
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Sep; 36(9):6527-6534. PubMed ID: 35024932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: A prospective randomized clinical trial between cold snare polypectomy and hot forceps biopsy.
    Komeda Y; Kashida H; Sakurai T; Tribonias G; Okamoto K; Kono M; Yamada M; Adachi T; Mine H; Nagai T; Asakuma Y; Hagiwara S; Matsui S; Watanabe T; Kitano M; Chikugo T; Chiba Y; Kudo M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Jan; 23(2):328-335. PubMed ID: 28127206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy and safety of three different endoscopic methods in treatment of 6-20 mm colorectal polyps.
    Li D; Wang W; Xie J; Liu G; Wang R; Jiang C; Ye Z; Xu B; He X; Hong D
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2020 Mar; 55(3):362-370. PubMed ID: 32150478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cold snare polypectomy versus cold endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Kim MJ; Na SY; Kim JS; Choi HH; Kim DB; Ji JS; Kim BW; Choi H
    Surg Endosc; 2023 May; 37(5):3789-3795. PubMed ID: 36690892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The efficacy and safety of cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for endoscopic removal of small colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Liu W; Gong J; Gu L
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 May; 38(1):136. PubMed ID: 37204495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cold snare polypectomy vs. Cold forceps polypectomy using double-biopsy technique for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized study.
    Lee CK; Shim JJ; Jang JY
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Oct; 108(10):1593-600. PubMed ID: 24042189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Protocol design for randomized clinical trial to compare underwater cold snare polypectomy to conventional cold snare polypectomy for non-pedunculated colon polyps of size 5-10 mm (COLDWATER study).
    Zachou M; Varytimiadis K; Androutsakos T; Katsaras G; Zoumpouli C; Lalla E; Nifora M; Karantanos P; Nikiteas N; Sougioultzis S; Kalaitzakis E; Kykalos S
    Tech Coloproctol; 2023 Apr; 27(4):325-333. PubMed ID: 36399201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cold polypectomy techniques for small and diminutive colorectal polyps: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Abuelazm M; Awad AK; Mohamed I; Mahmoud A; Shaikhkhalil H; Shaheen N; Abdelwahab O; Afifi AM; Abdelazeem B; Othman MO
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2023 Oct; 39(10):1329-1339. PubMed ID: 37735986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Polypectomy for complete endoscopic resection of small colorectal polyps.
    Zhang Q; Gao P; Han B; Xu J; Shen Y
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Mar; 87(3):733-740. PubMed ID: 28647136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective randomized comparative study of cold forceps polypectomy by using narrow-band imaging endoscopy versus cold snare polypectomy in patients with diminutive colorectal polyps.
    Park SK; Ko BM; Han JP; Hong SJ; Lee MS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Mar; 83(3):527-32.e1. PubMed ID: 26358331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients: a prospective randomized comparison of cold snare and conventional polypectomy.
    Horiuchi A; Nakayama Y; Kajiyama M; Tanaka N; Sano K; Graham DY
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Mar; 79(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 24125514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cold Snare Polypectomy With or Without Submucosal Injection for Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Polyps: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Lv XH; Liu T; Wang ZJ; Gan T; Yang JL
    Dig Dis Sci; 2024 Apr; 69(4):1411-1420. PubMed ID: 38418684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cold snare polypectomy compared to cold forceps polypectomy for endoscopic resection of guideline defined diminutive polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Lv YC; Yao YH; Lei JJ; Tang T
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Dec; 42(6):757-765. PubMed ID: 37776439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating Cold Snare and Forceps Polypectomy Among Small POLYPs in Rates of Complete Resection: The TINYPOLYP Trial.
    Wei MT; Louie CY; Chen Y; Pan JY; Quan SY; Wong R; Brown R; Clark M; Jensen K; Lau H; Friedland S
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2022 Aug; 117(8):1305-1310. PubMed ID: 35467557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of cold snare polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection for 3-10-mm colorectal polyps in end-stage renal disease patients.
    Oh CK; Choi HS; Cho YS
    Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2022; 28(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 34755710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness and safety of cold snare polypectomy and cold endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps of 10-19 mm: a multicenter observational cohort study.
    Mangira D; Raftopoulos S; Vogrin S; Hartley I; Mack A; Gazelakis K; Nalankilli K; Trinh A; Metz AJ; Appleyard M; Grimpen F; Elliott T; Brown G; Moss A
    Endoscopy; 2023 Jul; 55(7):627-635. PubMed ID: 36750222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy and Safety of Cold Snare Polypectomy versus Cold Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Resecting 3-10 mm Colorectal Polyps: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Wang ST; Kong QZ; Li YQ; Ji R
    Digestion; 2024; 105(3):157-165. PubMed ID: 38198754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for resecting small colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shinozaki S; Kobayashi Y; Hayashi Y; Sakamoto H; Lefor AK; Yamamoto H
    Dig Endosc; 2018 Sep; 30(5):592-599. PubMed ID: 29675857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pedunculated colorectal polyps with heads ≤ 1 cm in diameter can be resected using cold snare polypectomy.
    Kudo T; Horiuchi A; Horiuchi I; Kajiyama M; Morita A; Tanaka N
    Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2021; 84(3):411-415. PubMed ID: 34599564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Jumbo biopsy forceps versus cold snares for removing diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Huh CW; Kim JS; Choi HH; Maeng IS; Jun SY; Kim BW
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Jul; 90(1):105-111. PubMed ID: 30684600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.