189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35025036)
41. The impact of a dedicated operating room team on robotic transplant program growth and fellowship training.
Hill AL; Scherer MD; Kiani A; Vachharajani N; Matson S; Cullinan DR; Martens GR; Yu J; Davidson JT; Wellen JR; Chapman WC; Doyle MB; Khan AS
Clin Transplant; 2023 Nov; 37(11):e15103. PubMed ID: 37605386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Ratio of Economy of Motion: A New Objective Performance Indicator to Assign Consoles During Dual-Console Robotic Proctectomy.
Devin CL; Gillani M; Shields MC; Eldredge K; Kucera W; Rupji M; Purvis LA; Paul Olson TJ; Liu Y; Jarc A; Rosen SA
Am Surg; 2023 Aug; 89(8):3416-3422. PubMed ID: 36898676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Does training of fellows affect peri-operative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy?
Khene ZE; Peyronnet B; Bosquet E; Pradère B; Robert C; Fardoun T; Kammerer-Jacquet SF; Verhoest G; Rioux-Leclercq N; Mathieu R; Bensalah K
BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):591-599. PubMed ID: 28464554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The robot doesn't lie: real-life validation of robotic performance metrics.
Quinn KM; Chen X; Runge LT; Pieper H; Renton D; Meara M; Collins C; Griffiths C; Husain S
Surg Endosc; 2023 Jul; 37(7):5547-5552. PubMed ID: 36266482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Participation of Colon and Rectal Fellows in Robotic Rectal Cancer Surgery: Effect on Surgical Outcomes.
Collins D; Machairas N; Duchalais E; Landmann RG; Merchea A; Colibaseanu DT; Kelley SR; Mathis KL; Dozois EJ; Larson DW
J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(2):465-470. PubMed ID: 28720424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Surgical Science-Simbionix Robotic Hysterectomy Simulator: Validating a New Tool.
Cope AG; Lazaro-Weiss JJ; Willborg BE; Lindstrom ED; Mara KC; Destephano CC; Vetter MH; Glaser GE; Langstraat CL; Chen AH; Martino MA; Dinh TA; Salani R; Green IC
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Jun; 29(6):759-766. PubMed ID: 35123040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Multidisciplinary validation study of the da Vinci Skills Simulator: educational tool and assessment device.
Foell K; Furse A; Honey RJ; Pace KT; Lee JY
J Robot Surg; 2013 Dec; 7(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 27001876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Ready for the robot? A cross-sectional survey of OB/GYN fellowship directors' experience and expectations of their incoming fellow's robotic surgical skills.
Hall EF; Bregar AJ; Robison K; Ruhotina M; Raker CA; Wohlrab K
J Robot Surg; 2021 Oct; 15(5):723-729. PubMed ID: 33141409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Surgical training of gynecologic oncology fellows: Long-term trends and implications for future education.
Hoffman M; Dunsmore V; Cliby W; Chi D; Wheeler S; Clarke-Pearson D
Gynecol Oncol; 2024 May; 184():254-258. PubMed ID: 38696840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The development of a robotic gynaecological surgery training curriculum and results of a delphi study.
Ismail A; Wood M; Ind T; Gul N; Moss E
BMC Med Educ; 2020 Mar; 20(1):66. PubMed ID: 32131812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparing the da Vinci si single console and dual console in teaching novice surgeons suturing techniques.
Crusco S; Jackson T; Advincula A
JSLS; 2014; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 25392618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications-surgical volume matters: a retrospective cohort study comparing complications of robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic hysterectomies.
Baracy MG; Martinez M; Hagglund K; Afzal F; Kulkarni S; Corey L; Aslam MF
J Robot Surg; 2022 Oct; 16(5):1199-1207. PubMed ID: 34981444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Training for next generation surgeons: a pilot study of robot-assisted hysterectomy managed by resident using dual console.
Klapczynski C; Sallée C; Tardieu A; Peschot C; Boutot M; Mohand N; Lacorre A; Margueritte F; Gauthier T
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Apr; 303(4):981-986. PubMed ID: 33180173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Validation of a novel robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy surgical training model.
Hung AJ; Ng CK; Patil MB; Zehnder P; Huang E; Aron M; Gill IS; Desai MM
BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):870-4. PubMed ID: 22313582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Implementation and evaluation of a novel subspecialty society fellows robotic surgical course: the SGO minimally invasive academy surgical curriculum.
Boitano TKL; Smith HJ; Cohen JG; Rossi EC; Kim KH
J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Mar; 32(2):e26. PubMed ID: 33470068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Safety, feasibility and learning curve of robotic single-site surgery in gynecology.
El Hachem L; Momeni M; Friedman K; Moshier EL; Chuang LT; Gretz HF
Int J Med Robot; 2016 Sep; 12(3):509-16. PubMed ID: 26096813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. National learning curves among robotic thoracic surgeons in the United States: Quantifying the impact of procedural experience on efficiency and productivity gains.
Vijayakumar A; Abdel-Rasoul M; Hekmat R; Merritt RE; D'Souza DM; Jackson GP; Kneuertz PJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2024 Mar; 167(3):869-879.e2. PubMed ID: 37562675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The economy of motion of the totally robotic gastric bypass: technique, learning curve, and outcomes of a fellowship-trained, robotic bariatric surgeon.
Starnes CC; Gochnour DC; Hall B; Wilson EB; Snyder BE
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 May; 25(5):411-8. PubMed ID: 25853837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Pilot Validation Study of the European Association of Urology Robotic Training Curriculum.
Volpe A; Ahmed K; Dasgupta P; Ficarra V; Novara G; van der Poel H; Mottrie A
Eur Urol; 2015 Aug; 68(2):292-9. PubMed ID: 25454612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator.
Hung AJ; Zehnder P; Patil MB; Cai J; Ng CK; Aron M; Gill IS; Desai MM
J Urol; 2011 Sep; 186(3):1019-24. PubMed ID: 21784469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
