185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35025036)
61. Single- versus dual-console robotic surgery: dual improves the educational experience for trainees.
Goonewardene SS; Brown M; Challacombe B
World J Urol; 2016 Sep; 34(9):1337-9. PubMed ID: 26767531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. How to decide which infant can have robotic surgery? Just do the math.
Finkelstein JB; Levy AC; Silva MV; Murray L; Delaney C; Casale P
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Aug; 11(4):170.e1-4. PubMed ID: 25824875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. An analysis of the impact of previous laparoscopic hysterectomy experience on the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy.
Eddib A; Jain N; Aalto M; Hughes S; Eswar A; Erk M; Michalik C; Krovi V; Singhal P
J Robot Surg; 2013 Sep; 7(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 27000926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Robotic Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Hysterectomy and Salpingo-Oophorectomy in a Porcine Model.
Chan KL; Yeung CK; Lam KW; Cheung JL; Sreedhar B; Ngan HY
Surg Innov; 2022 Apr; 29(2):215-224. PubMed ID: 33980081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. Results of distal hypospadias repair after pediatric urology fellowship training: A comparison of junior surgeons with their mentor.
Bush NC; Barber TD; Dajusta D; Prieto JC; Ziada A; Snodgrass W
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Jun; 12(3):162.e1-4. PubMed ID: 27317623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Quantifying the "Assistant Effect" in Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP): Measures of Technical Performance.
Yu N; Saadat H; Finelli A; Lee JY; Singal RK; Grantcharov TP; Goldenberg MG
J Surg Res; 2021 Apr; 260():307-314. PubMed ID: 33370599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. The concentration of console surgeons: prospective evaluation of the loss of attention in robotic-assisted procedures.
Martinschek A; Welzel G; Ritter M; Heinrich E; Bolenz C; Trojan L
J Robot Surg; 2018 Dec; 12(4):673-678. PubMed ID: 29550992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Robotic Assistance Confers Ambidexterity to Laparoscopic Surgeons.
Choussein S; Srouji SS; Farland LV; Wietsma A; Missmer SA; Hollis M; Yu RN; Pozner CN; Gargiulo AR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 28734971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery.
Truong M; Kim JH; Scheib S; Patzkowsky K
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 28(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 27362711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Survey of obstetrics and gynecology residents' training and opinions on robotic surgery.
Smith AL; Schneider KM; Berens PD
J Robot Surg; 2010 May; 4(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 27638568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Twenty-year surgical trends in a gynecologic oncology fellowship training program: Implications for practice.
Hoffman MS; Xiong Y; Apte S; Roberts W; Wenham RM
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Nov; 155(2):359-364. PubMed ID: 31575391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Initial Experience in Rectal Cancer Surgery for the Next Generation of Robotic Surgeons Trained in a Dual Console System.
Yamamoto M; Ashida K; Hara K; Sugezawa K; Uejima C; Tanio A; Shishido Y; Miyatani K; Hanaki T; Kihara K; Matsunaga T; Tokuyasu N; Sakamoto T; Fujiwara Y
Yonago Acta Med; 2021 Aug; 64(3):240-248. PubMed ID: 34429701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Robotic Dual-Console Distal Pancreatectomy: Could it be Considered a Safe Approach and Surgical Teaching even in Pancreatic Surgery? A Retrospective Observational Study Cohort.
De Pastena M; Salvia R; Paiella S; Deiro G; Bannone E; Balduzzi A; Giuliani T; Casetti L; Ramera M; Filippini C; Montagnini G; Landoni L; Esposito A
World J Surg; 2021 Oct; 45(10):3191-3197. PubMed ID: 34304274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Surgeon experience, robotic perioperative outcomes, and complications in gynecology.
Bottura B; Porto B; Moretti-Marques R; Barison G; Zlotnik E; Podgaec S; Gomes MTV
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2022; 68(11):1514-1518. PubMed ID: 36449767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. A review of clinical and oncological outcomes following the introduction of the first robotic colorectal surgery programme to a university teaching hospital in Ireland using a dual console training platform.
Fleming CA; Westby D; Ullah MF; Mohan HM; Sehgal R; Bolger JC; O'Leary DP; McNamara E; Korpanty G; El Bassiouni M; Condon E; Coffey JC; Peirce C
J Robot Surg; 2020 Dec; 14(6):889-896. PubMed ID: 32232680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Cost variance across obesity class for women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy by high-volume gynecologic surgeons.
Klebanoff JS; Tyan P; Nishikawa M; North A; Amdur R; Sparks A; Kazma JM; Moawad GN
J Robot Surg; 2020 Dec; 14(6):903-907. PubMed ID: 32253574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Intraoperative workload in robotic surgery assessed by wearable motion tracking sensors and questionnaires.
Yu D; Dural C; Morrow MM; Yang L; Collins JW; Hallbeck S; Kjellman M; Forsman M
Surg Endosc; 2017 Feb; 31(2):877-886. PubMed ID: 27495330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: a systematic review.
Schreuder HW; Wolswijk R; Zweemer RP; Schijven MP; Verheijen RH
BJOG; 2012 Jan; 119(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 21981104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Does the experience of the bedside assistant effect the results of robotic surgeons in the learning curve of robot assisted radical prostatectomy?
Cimen HI; Atik YT; Altinova S; Adsan O; Balbay MD
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 30521164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Validity and reliability of the robotic Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills.
Siddiqui NY; Galloway ML; Geller EJ; Green IC; Hur HC; Langston K; Pitter MC; Tarr ME; Martino MA
Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 123(6):1193-1199. PubMed ID: 24807319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
