These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35028021)

  • 1. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 5-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated with CAD/CAM technology using direct and indirect digital scans.
    Uluc IG; Guncu MB; Aktas G; Turkyilmaz I
    J Dent Sci; 2022 Jan; 17(1):63-69. PubMed ID: 35028021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit zirconia frameworks fabricated with CAD-CAM technology using direct and indirect digital scans.
    Arezoobakhsh A; Shayegh SS; Jamali Ghomi A; Hakimaneh SMR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 30982618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression.
    Su TS; Sun J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 27061628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
    Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal and internal fit of five-unit zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses fabricated with digital scans and conventional impressions: A comparative in vitro study.
    Bandiaky ON; Clouet R; Le Bars P; Soueidan A; Le Guehennec L
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(9):846-853. PubMed ID: 36627825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
    Lee B; Oh KC; Haam D; Lee JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of number of pontics and impression technique on the accuracy of four-unit monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses.
    Kim WK; Kim S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):860.e1-860.e7. PubMed ID: 29526302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit of Ceramic Laminate Veneers Fabricated with Five Intraoral Scanners and Indirect Digitization.
    Al-Dwairi ZN; Al-Sardi M; Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ; Al Hamad KQ; Özcan M; Al-Haj Husain N; Baba NZ
    Materials (Basel); 2023 Mar; 16(6):. PubMed ID: 36984061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An In Vitro Comparison of the Marginal Adaptation Accuracy of CAD/CAM Restorations Using Different Impression Systems.
    Shembesh M; Ali A; Finkelman M; Weber HP; Zandparsa R
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):581-586. PubMed ID: 26855068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In Vitro Comparison of Marginal and Internal Fit of Zirconia Copings Fabricated by One CAD/CAM System with Two Different Scanners.
    Khamverdi Z; Najafrad E; Farhadian M
    Front Dent; 2021; 18():2. PubMed ID: 35965724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
    Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12.
    Özal Ç; Ulusoy M
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2021 Dec; 13(6):373-384. PubMed ID: 35003553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fit of 4-unit FDPs made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside and labside digitalization--a laboratory study.
    Keul C; Stawarczyk B; Erdelt KJ; Beuer F; Edelhoff D; Güth JF
    Dent Mater; 2014 Apr; 30(4):400-7. PubMed ID: 24522150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal Accuracy of Monolithic and Veneered Zirconia Crowns Fabricated by Conventional and Digital Workflows.
    Abduo J; Ho G; Centorame A; Chohan S; Park C; Abdouni R; Le P; Ngo C
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 32(8):706-713. PubMed ID: 36321644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fit of 4-unit FDPs from CoCr and zirconia after conventional and digital impressions.
    Ueda K; Beuer F; Stimmelmayr M; Erdelt K; Keul C; Güth JF
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 26121970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal and internal fit of zirconia copings obtained using different digital scanning methods.
    Pedroche LO; Bernardes SR; Leão MP; Kintopp CC; Correr GM; Ornaghi BP; Gonzaga CC
    Braz Oral Res; 2016 Oct; 30(1):e113. PubMed ID: 27737366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns made from Conventional, Digital, or Conventional/Digital Techniques.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Al Omari WM; Baba NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e580-e586. PubMed ID: 30091168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of high-translucent zirconia CAD/CAM fixed dental prostheses using a digital workflow: A clinical study up to 6 years.
    Guncu MB; Aktas G; Turkyilmaz I; Gavras JN
    J Dent Sci; 2023 Jan; 18(1):44-49. PubMed ID: 36643237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of scanner, powder application, and adjustments on CAD-CAM crown misfit.
    Prudente MS; Davi LR; Nabbout KO; Prado CJ; Pereira LM; Zancopé K; Neves FD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 28689912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.