157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35028702)
1. Predictors of postoperative complications from stress urinary incontinence procedures: a NSQIP database study.
Bonus ML; Luchristt D; Brown O; Collins S; Kenton K; Bretschneider CE
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Aug; 33(8):2291-2297. PubMed ID: 35028702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Readmission and reoperation after midurethral sling.
Hokenstad ED; Glasgow AE; Habermann EB; Occhino JA
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Sep; 29(9):1367-1370. PubMed ID: 29327120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stress Urinary Incontinence Surgery in Washington State Before and After Introduction of the Mesh Midurethral Sling.
Stewart LE; Eston MA; Symons RG; Fialkow MF; Kirby AC
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(5):358-361. PubMed ID: 29894326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. National Surgical Trends and Perioperative Outcomes of Midurethral Sling Placement for Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Slopnick EA; Hijaz AK; Nguyen CT; Abouassaly R; Gonzalez CM; Mahajan ST; Henderson JW; Bream MJ; Kim SP
Urology; 2017 Jan; 99():57-61. PubMed ID: 27669653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reoperation and readmission after clipping of an unruptured intracranial aneurysm: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.
Dasenbrock HH; Smith TR; Rudy RF; Gormley WB; Aziz-Sultan MA; Du R
J Neurosurg; 2018 Mar; 128(3):756-767. PubMed ID: 28387620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Midurethral sling shortening for persistent stress urinary incontinence.
Miranne JM; Hampton BS; Sung VW
Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Jun; 23(6):805-7. PubMed ID: 22143449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term Risk of Reoperation After Synthetic Mesh Midurethral Sling Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 134(5):1047-1055. PubMed ID: 31599825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Thirty-day readmission and reoperation after surgery for spinal tumors: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.
Karhade AV; Vasudeva VS; Dasenbrock HH; Lu Y; Gormley WB; Groff MW; Chi JH; Smith TR
Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Aug; 41(2):E5. PubMed ID: 27476847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vaginal prolapse repair with or without a midurethral sling in women with genital prolapse and occult stress urinary incontinence: a randomized trial.
van der Ploeg JM; Oude Rengerink K; van der Steen A; van Leeuwen JH; van der Vaart CH; Roovers JP;
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jul; 27(7):1029-38. PubMed ID: 26740197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Suburethral sling procedures in the United States: complications, readmission, and reoperation.
Propst K; O'Sullivan DM; Tulikangas PK
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Oct; 28(10):1463-1467. PubMed ID: 28236038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of complication rates related to male urethral slings and artificial urinary sphincters for urinary incontinence: national multi-institutional analysis of ACS-NSQIP database.
Alwaal A; Harris CR; Awad MA; Allen IE; Breyer BN
Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Oct; 48(10):1571-6. PubMed ID: 27417131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of midurethral sling surgery on the development of urinary tract infections.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Apr; 33(4):829-834. PubMed ID: 33797594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rates of Sling Procedures and Revisions-A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database Study.
Bretschneider CE; Geynisman-Tan J; Mueller MG; Collins SA; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Kenton K
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jun; 27(6):e559-e562. PubMed ID: 33315624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low Serum Albumin Correlates With Adverse Events Following Surgery for Male Urinary Incontinence: Analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project.
Ginsburg KB; Schwabe JR; Cochrane JA; Tapper A; Burks F; Rambhatla A
Urology; 2020 Mar; 137():178-182. PubMed ID: 31866523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reoperation for Urinary Incontinence After Retropubic and Transobturator Sling Procedures.
Trabuco EC; Carranza D; El Nashar SA; Weaver AL; McGree ME; Elliott DS; Linder BJ; Occhino J; Gebhart JB; Klingele CJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 134(2):333-342. PubMed ID: 31306327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk Factors for Returning to the Operating Room for a Second Surgery After Midurethral Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Sharif F; Mahmud F; Suman S; Cheng AL; Shepherd JP; Sutkin G
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Jul; 26(7):443-446. PubMed ID: 32217917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgeon volume and reoperation risk after midurethral sling surgery.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 221(5):523.e1-523.e8. PubMed ID: 31526790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing risk of repeat surgery for stress urinary incontinence after mid-urethral slings and polyacrylamide hydrogel.
Svenningsen R; Oversand SH; Schiøtz HA; Kulseng-Hanssen S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Dec; 100(12):2186-2192. PubMed ID: 34622944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early voiding dysfunction after midurethral sling surgery: comparison of two management approaches.
Brennand EA; Tang S; Birch C; Robert M; Kim-Fine S
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Oct; 28(10):1515-1526. PubMed ID: 28285398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-Term Safety with Sling Mesh Implants for Stress Incontinence.
Chughtai B; Mao J; Matheny ME; Mauer E; Banerjee S; Sedrakyan A
J Urol; 2021 Jan; 205(1):183-190. PubMed ID: 32749936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
