669 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35029302)
1. Towards subpercentage uncertainty proton stopping-power mapping via dual-energy CT: Direct experimental validation and uncertainty analysis of a statistical iterative image reconstruction method.
Medrano M; Liu R; Zhao T; Webb T; Politte DG; Whiting BR; Liao R; Ge T; Porras-Chaverri MA; O'Sullivan JA; Williamson JF
Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1599-1618. PubMed ID: 35029302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experimental implementation of a joint statistical image reconstruction method for proton stopping power mapping from dual-energy CT data.
Zhang S; Han D; Williamson JF; Zhao T; Politte DG; Whiting BR; O'Sullivan JA
Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):273-285. PubMed ID: 30421790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of joint statistical dual-energy CT reconstruction of proton stopping power images: Comparison to image- and sinogram-domain material decomposition approaches.
Zhang S; Han D; Politte DG; Williamson JF; O'Sullivan JA
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2129-2142. PubMed ID: 29570809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A linear, separable two-parameter model for dual energy CT imaging of proton stopping power computation.
Han D; Siebers JV; Williamson JF
Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):600. PubMed ID: 26745952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stopping-power ratio estimation for proton radiotherapy using dual-energy computed tomography and prior-image constrained denoising.
Zimmerman J; Thor D; Poludniowski G
Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1481-1495. PubMed ID: 36322128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic analysis of the impact of imaging noise on dual-energy CT-based proton stopping power ratio estimation.
Lee HHC; Li B; Duan X; Zhou L; Jia X; Yang M
Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2251-2263. PubMed ID: 30883827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of proton stopping power ratios using dual-energy CT basis material decomposition.
Pettersson E; Thilander-Klang A; Bäck A
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):881-897. PubMed ID: 38194501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Bayesian approach to solve proton stopping powers from noisy multi-energy CT data.
Lalonde A; Bär E; Bouchard H
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5293-5302. PubMed ID: 28752662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Convolutional neural network based proton stopping-power-ratio estimation with dual-energy CT: a feasibility study.
Lee HH; Park YK; Duan X; Jia X; Jiang S; Yang M
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 65(21):215016. PubMed ID: 32736368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The potential of dual-energy CT to reduce proton beam range uncertainties.
Bär E; Lalonde A; Royle G; Lu HM; Bouchard H
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2332-2344. PubMed ID: 28295434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Theoretical and experimental analysis of photon counting detector CT for proton stopping power prediction.
Taasti VT; Hansen DC; Michalak GJ; Deisher AJ; Kruse JJ; Muren LP; Petersen JBB; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):5186-5196. PubMed ID: 30191573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric comparison of stopping power calibration with dual-energy CT and single-energy CT in proton therapy treatment planning.
Zhu J; Penfold SN
Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2845-2854. PubMed ID: 27277033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of proton stopping power ratio estimation based on dual energy CT using fresh tissue samples.
Taasti VT; Michalak GJ; Hansen DC; Deisher AJ; Kruse JJ; Krauss B; Muren LP; Petersen JBB; McCollough CH
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Dec; 63(1):015012. PubMed ID: 29057753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A robust empirical parametrization of proton stopping power using dual energy CT.
Taasti VT; Petersen JB; Muren LP; Thygesen J; Hansen DC
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5547. PubMed ID: 27782721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimal energy selection for proton stopping-power-ratio estimation using dual-energy CT-based monoenergetic imaging.
Je E; Lee HH; Duan X; Li B; Jia X; Yang M
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Oct; 64(19):195015. PubMed ID: 31437824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electron density and effective atomic number estimation in a maximum a posteriori framework for dual-energy computed tomography.
Simard M; Bär E; Blais D; Bouchard H
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):4137-4149. PubMed ID: 32491193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ex vivo validation of a stoichiometric dual energy CT proton stopping power ratio calibration.
Xie Y; Ainsley C; Yin L; Zou W; McDonough J; Solberg TD; Lin A; Teo BK
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Mar; 63(5):055016. PubMed ID: 29513647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technical Note: On the accuracy of parametric two-parameter photon cross-section models in dual-energy CT applications.
Han D; Porras-Chaverri MA; O'Sullivan JA; Politte DG; Williamson JF
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2438-2446. PubMed ID: 28295418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of proton therapy treatment planning for head tumors with a pencil beam algorithm on dual and single energy CT images.
Hudobivnik N; Schwarz F; Johnson T; Agolli L; Dedes G; Tessonnier T; Verhaegen F; Thieke C; Belka C; Sommer WH; Parodi K; Landry G
Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):495. PubMed ID: 26745942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimization of dual-energy CT acquisitions for proton therapy using projection-based decomposition.
Vilches-Freixas G; Létang JM; Ducros N; Rit S
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4548-4558. PubMed ID: 28675582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
