BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35030551)

  • 21. Prelingually Deaf Children With Cochlear Implants Show Better Perception of Voice Cues and Speech in Competing Speech Than Postlingually Deaf Adults With Cochlear Implants.
    Nagels L; Gaudrain E; Vickers D; Hendriks P; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2024 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):952-968. PubMed ID: 38616318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Cross-Linguistic Validation of the Test for Rating Emotions in Speech: Acoustic Analyses of Emotional Sentences in English, German, and Hebrew.
    Carl M; Icht M; Ben-David BM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 65(3):991-1000. PubMed ID: 35171689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Multimodal and Spectral Degradation Effects on Speech and Emotion Recognition in Adult Listeners.
    Ritter C; Vongpaisal T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518804966. PubMed ID: 30378469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Acoustic cue integration in speech intonation recognition with cochlear implants.
    Peng SC; Chatterjee M; Lu N
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Jun; 16(2):67-82. PubMed ID: 22790392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Using prosody to infer discourse prominence in cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    Huang YT; Newman RS; Catalano A; Goupell MJ
    Cognition; 2017 Sep; 166():184-200. PubMed ID: 28578222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; Boyle PJ; De Seta E; DeVincentiis M; Mancini P
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Speech intonation and melodic contour recognition in children with cochlear implants and with normal hearing.
    See RL; Driscoll VD; Gfeller K; Kliethermes S; Oleson J
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):490-8. PubMed ID: 23442568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The perception of stress and intonation in children with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid.
    Hegarty L; Faulkner A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Nov; 14 Suppl 4():S35-9. PubMed ID: 24533762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Voice emotion perception and production in cochlear implant users.
    Jiam NT; Caldwell M; Deroche ML; Chatterjee M; Limb CJ
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 352():30-39. PubMed ID: 28088500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prosody Perception and Production in Children with Hearing Loss and Age- and Gender-Matched Controls.
    Kalathottukaren RT; Purdy SC; Ballard E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Apr; 28(4):283-294. PubMed ID: 28418324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Semantic influences on the perception of degraded speech by individuals with cochlear implants.
    Patro C; Mendel LL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Mar; 147(3):1778. PubMed ID: 32237796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Emotion and Word Recognition for Unprocessed and Vocoded Speech Stimuli.
    Morgan SD; Garrard S; Hoskins T
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(2):398-407. PubMed ID: 34310412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Discourse Strategies and the Production of Prosody by Prelingually Deaf Adolescent Cochlear Implant Users.
    Holt CM; Yuen I; Demuth K
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):e101-e108. PubMed ID: 27517744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. High-Variability Sentence Recognition in Long-Term Cochlear Implant Users: Associations With Rapid Phonological Coding and Executive Functioning.
    Smith GNL; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1149-1161. PubMed ID: 30601227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spectro-temporal cues enhance modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Zheng Y; Escabí M; Litovsky RY
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():45-54. PubMed ID: 28601530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Visual Temporal Acuity Is Related to Auditory Speech Perception Abilities in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Jahn KN; Stevenson RA; Wallace MT
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):236-243. PubMed ID: 27764001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How Does Nonverbal Reasoning Affect Sentence Recognition in Adults with Cochlear Implants and Normal-Hearing Peers?
    Moberly AC; Mattingly JK; Castellanos I
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(3):127-138. PubMed ID: 31266013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Emotional speech processing: disentangling the effects of prosody and semantic cues.
    Pell MD; Jaywant A; Monetta L; Kotz SA
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Aug; 25(5):834-53. PubMed ID: 21824024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Adults with cochlear implants can use prosody to determine the clausal structure of spoken sentences.
    Amichetti NM; Neukam J; Kinney AJ; Capach N; March SU; Svirsky MA; Wingfield A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Dec; 150(6):4315. PubMed ID: 34972310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.