These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

418 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35030551)

  • 41. Adults with cochlear implants can use prosody to determine the clausal structure of spoken sentences.
    Amichetti NM; Neukam J; Kinney AJ; Capach N; March SU; Svirsky MA; Wingfield A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Dec; 150(6):4315. PubMed ID: 34972310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The Perception of Regional Dialects and Foreign Accents by Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB; Moberly AC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Feb; 64(2):683-690. PubMed ID: 33493399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Processing emotional prosody in a foreign language: the case of German and Hebrew.
    Shakuf V; Ben-David B; Wegner TGG; Wesseling PBC; Mentzel M; Defren S; Allen SEM; Lachmann T
    J Cult Cogn Sci; 2022; 6(3):251-268. PubMed ID: 35996660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Supra-normal skills in processing of visuo-auditory prosodic information by cochlear-implanted deaf patients.
    Lasfargues-Delannoy A; Strelnikov K; Deguine O; Marx M; Barone P
    Hear Res; 2021 Oct; 410():108330. PubMed ID: 34492444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Gated Word Recognition by Postlingually Deafened Adults With Cochlear Implants: Influence of Semantic Context.
    Patro C; Mendel LL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Jan; 61(1):145-158. PubMed ID: 29242894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
    Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Access to semantic cues does not lead to perceptual restoration of interrupted speech in cochlear-implant users.
    Jaekel BN; Weinstein S; Newman RS; Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Mar; 149(3):1488. PubMed ID: 33765790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Processing of Spoken Emotions in Schizophrenia: Forensic and Non-forensic Patients Differ in Emotional Identification and Integration but Not in Selective Attention.
    Leshem R; Icht M; Ben-David BM
    Front Psychiatry; 2022; 13():847455. PubMed ID: 35386523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effect of Spectral Contrast Enhancement on Speech-on-Speech Intelligibility and Voice Cue Sensitivity in Cochlear Implant Users.
    El Boghdady N; Langner F; Gaudrain E; Başkent D; Nogueira W
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):271-289. PubMed ID: 32925307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Recognition of emotional prosody by Mandarin-speaking adults with cochlear implants.
    Pak CL; Katz WF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Aug; 146(2):EL165. PubMed ID: 31472572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Predicting emotion perception abilities for cochlear implant users.
    Paquette S; Deroche MLD; Goffi-Gomez MV; Hoshino ACH; Lehmann A
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Oct; 62(10):946-954. PubMed ID: 36047767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Links of Prosodic Stress Perception and Musical Activities to Language Skills of Children With Cochlear Implants and Normal Hearing.
    Torppa R; Faulkner A; Laasonen M; Lipsanen J; Sammler D
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):395-410. PubMed ID: 31397704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Verbal Learning and Memory in Early-Implanted, Prelingually Deaf Adolescent and Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    Chandramouli SH; Kronenberger WG; Pisoni DB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1033-1050. PubMed ID: 30986141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of Speech Perception Performance According to Prosody Change Between People With Normal Hearing and Cochlear Implant Users.
    Kim EY; Seol HY
    J Audiol Otol; 2024 Apr; 28(2):119-125. PubMed ID: 38052522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia.
    Cooper WB; Tobey E; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):618-26. PubMed ID: 18469714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Influences of semantic and prosodic cues on word repetition and categorization in autism.
    Singh L; Harrow MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 57(5):1764-78. PubMed ID: 24801807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Processing of speech temporal and spectral information by users of auditory brainstem implants and cochlear implants.
    Azadpour M; McKay CM
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e192-203. PubMed ID: 25010634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Use of affective prosody by young and older adults.
    Dupuis K; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Mar; 25(1):16-29. PubMed ID: 20230124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.