141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35031998)
1. Prediction of groundwater drawdown using artificial neural networks.
Gholami V; Sahour H
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(22):33544-33557. PubMed ID: 35031998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for groundwater quality modeling.
Sahour S; Khanbeyki M; Gholami V; Sahour H; Kahvazade I; Karimi H
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(16):46004-46021. PubMed ID: 36715809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of pumping induced flow in observation wells during aquifer testing.
Székely F
Ground Water; 2013; 51(5):762-7. PubMed ID: 23198759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Models for Accurate Estimation of Groundwater Nitrate Concentration.
Band SS; Janizadeh S; Pal SC; Chowdhuri I; Siabi Z; Norouzi A; Melesse AM; Shokri M; Mosavi A
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Oct; 20(20):. PubMed ID: 33053663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dual-Screened Vertical Circulation Wells for Groundwater Lowering in Unconfined Aquifers.
Jin Y; Holzbecher E; Sauter M
Ground Water; 2016 Jan; 54(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 25801278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A GIS-expert-based approach for groundwater quality monitoring network design in an alluvial aquifer: a case study and a practical guide.
Taheri K; Missimer TM; Amini V; Bahrami J; Omidipour R
Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Oct; 192(11):684. PubMed ID: 33026519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The unusual and large drawdown response of buried-valley aquifers to pumping.
van der Kamp G; Maathuis H
Ground Water; 2012; 50(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 21671937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An analytical method to determine ground water supply well network designs.
MacMillan GJ
Ground Water; 2009; 47(6):822-7. PubMed ID: 19682093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interpretation of Pumping Tests in Heterogeneous Aquifers with Constant Head Boundary.
Pechstein A; Copty NK
Ground Water; 2021 Jul; 59(4):517-523. PubMed ID: 33389747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A New Solution for Confined-Unconfined Flow Toward a Fully Penetrating Well in a Confined Aquifer.
Xiao L; Ye M; Xu Y
Ground Water; 2018 Nov; 56(6):959-968. PubMed ID: 29417577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel ensemble computational intelligence approach for the spatial prediction of land subsidence susceptibility.
Arabameri A; Saha S; Roy J; Tiefenbacher JP; Cerda A; Biggs T; Pradhan B; Thi Ngo PT; Collins AL
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jul; 726():138595. PubMed ID: 32320885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Effect of Undetected Barriers on Groundwater Drawdown and Recovery.
Marshall SK; Cook PG; Miller AD; Simmons CT; Dogramaci S
Ground Water; 2019 Sep; 57(5):718-726. PubMed ID: 30614521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The prediction of aquifer groundwater level based on spatial clustering approach using machine learning.
Kardan Moghaddam H; Ghordoyee Milan S; Kayhomayoon Z; Rahimzadeh Kivi Z; Arya Azar N
Environ Monit Assess; 2021 Mar; 193(4):173. PubMed ID: 33687571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of artificial intelligence models for prediction of groundwater level fluctuations: case study (Tehran-Karaj alluvial aquifer).
Vadiati M; Rajabi Yami Z; Eskandari E; Nakhaei M; Kisi O
Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Jul; 194(9):619. PubMed ID: 35904687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Probability mapping of groundwater contamination by hydrocarbon from the deep oil reservoirs using GIS-based machine-learning algorithms: a case study of the Dammam aquifer (middle of Iraq).
Al-Mayahi HM; Al-Abadi AM; Fryar AE
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Mar; 28(11):13736-13751. PubMed ID: 33196994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. UAV-borne LiDAR revolutionizing groundwater level mapping.
García-López S; Vélez-Nicolás M; Zarandona-Palacio P; Curcio AC; Ruiz-Ortiz V; Barbero L
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Feb; 859(Pt 1):160272. PubMed ID: 36403836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating changes in radionuclide concentrations and groundwater levels before and after the cooling pond drawdown in the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant vicinity.
Sato H; Gusyev M; Veremenko D; Laptev G; Shibasaki N; Onda Y; Zheleznyak M; Kirieiev S; Nanba K
Sci Total Environ; 2023 May; 872():161997. PubMed ID: 36739017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Potential impacts of climate change on groundwater level through hybrid soft-computing methods: a case study-Shabestar Plain, Iran.
Jeihouni E; Mohammadi M; Eslamian S; Zareian MJ
Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Sep; 191(10):620. PubMed ID: 31493149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved characterization of small "u" for Jacob pumping test analysis methods.
Alexander SC; Saar MO
Ground Water; 2012; 50(2):256-65. PubMed ID: 21745205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance Analysis of ANN Prediction for Groundwater Level Considering Regional-Specific Influence Components.
Kim I; Lee J
Ground Water; 2022 May; 60(3):344-361. PubMed ID: 34873680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
