BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35033042)

  • 1. Reliability of preoperative MRI findings in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Banitalebi H; Espeland A; Anvar M; Hermansen E; Hellum C; Brox JI; Myklebust TÅ; Indrekvam K; Brisby H; Weber C; Aaen J; Austevoll IM; Grundnes O; Negård A
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Jan; 23(1):51. PubMed ID: 35033042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Degenerative lumbar spinal canal stenosis: intra- and inter-reader agreement for magnetic resonance imaging parameters.
    Winklhofer S; Held U; Burgstaller JM; Finkenstaedt T; Bolog N; Ulrich N; Steurer J; Andreisek G; Del Grande F
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):353-361. PubMed ID: 27334492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Degenerative findings in lumbar spine MRI: an inter-rater reliability study involving three raters.
    Doktor K; Jensen TS; Christensen HW; Fredberg U; Kindt M; Boyle E; Hartvigsen J
    Chiropr Man Therap; 2020 Feb; 28(1):8. PubMed ID: 32041626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel MRI index for paraspinal muscle fatty infiltration: reliability and relation to pain and disability in lumbar spinal stenosis: results from a multicentre study.
    Banitalebi H; Aaen J; Storheim K; Negård A; Myklebust TÅ; Grotle M; Hellum C; Espeland A; Anvar M; Indrekvam K; Weber C; Brox JI; Brisby H; Hermansen E
    Eur Radiol Exp; 2022 Jul; 6(1):38. PubMed ID: 35854201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lumbar spinal canal dimensions measured intraoperatively after decompression are not properly rendered on early postoperative MRI.
    Schenck C; van Susante J; van Gorp M; Belder R; Vleggeert-Lankamp C
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 May; 158(5):981-8. PubMed ID: 27005673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The reliability, correlation with clinical symptoms and surgical outcomes of dural sac cross-sectional area, nerve root sedimentation sign and morphological grade for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Yang J; Xiong Y; Hu Y; Huang M; Zhang L; Pu X; Li Q
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Mar; 24(1):225. PubMed ID: 36964515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient demographics and MRI-based measurements predict redundant nerve roots in lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective database cohort comparison.
    Papavero L; Marques CJ; Lohmann J; Fitting T
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Dec; 19(1):452. PubMed ID: 30579338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlation between Preoperative MRI Parameters and Oswestry Disability Index in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Study.
    Caprariu R; Oprea MD; Poenaru DV; Andrei D
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Nov; 59(11):. PubMed ID: 38004049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical and MRI findings in lumbar spinal stenosis: baseline data from the NORDSTEN study.
    Aaen J; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Banitalebi H; Anvar M; Brox JI; Weber C; Solberg T; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K; Hermansen E
    Eur Spine J; 2022 Jun; 31(6):1391-1398. PubMed ID: 34797405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of readings of magnetic resonance imaging features of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Lurie JD; Tosteson AN; Tosteson TD; Carragee E; Carrino JA; Kaiser J; Sequeiros RT; Lecomte AR; Grove MR; Blood EA; Pearson LH; Weinstein JN; Herzog R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jun; 33(14):1605-10. PubMed ID: 18552677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dural sac cross-sectional area and morphological grade show significant associations with patient-rated outcome of surgery for lumbar central spinal stenosis.
    Mannion AF; Fekete TF; Pacifico D; O'Riordan D; Nauer S; von Büren M; Schizas C
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2552-2564. PubMed ID: 28856447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparable increases in dural sac area after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: radiological results from a randomized controlled trial in the NORDSTEN study.
    Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Anvar M; Rekeland F; Brox JI; Franssen E; Weber C; Solberg T; Haug KJ; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K
    Eur Spine J; 2020 Sep; 29(9):2254-2261. PubMed ID: 32556585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched, cohort radiographic analysis.
    Singh K; Samartzis D; Vaccaro AR; Nassr A; Andersson GB; Yoon ST; Phillips FM; Goldberg EJ; An HS
    Spine J; 2005; 5(6):615-22. PubMed ID: 16291100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Increased Facet Fluid Predicts Dynamic Changes in the Dural Sac Size on Axial-Loaded MRI in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.
    Kanno H; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Aizawa T; Itoi E
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Apr; 37(4):730-5. PubMed ID: 26564439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Qualitative versus quantitative lumbar spinal stenosis grading by machine learning supported texture analysis-Experience from the LSOS study cohort.
    Huber FA; Stutz S; Vittoria de Martini I; Mannil M; Becker AS; Winklhofer S; Burgstaller JM; Guggenberger R
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():45-50. PubMed ID: 31005175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lumbar lordosis and sacral slope in lumbar spinal stenosis: standard values and measurement accuracy.
    Bredow J; Oppermann J; Scheyerer MJ; Gundlfinger K; Neiss WF; Budde S; Floerkemeier T; Eysel P; Beyer F
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 May; 135(5):607-12. PubMed ID: 25750110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Study-protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing clinical and radiological results after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: the Spinal Stenosis Trial (SST) (part of the NORDSTEN Study).
    Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Romild UK; Rekeland F; Solberg T; Storheim K; Grundnes O; Aaen J; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Mar; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28327114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Norwegian degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis (NORDSTEN) study: study overview, organization structure and study population.
    Indrekvam K; Bånerud IF; Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Rekeland F; Guddal MH; Solberg TK; Brox JI; Hellum C; Storheim K
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Dec; 32(12):4162-4173. PubMed ID: 37395780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic advancement of axial loaded lumbar spine MRI in patients with clinically suspected central spinal canal stenosis.
    Kim YK; Lee JW; Kim HJ; Yeom JS; Kang HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(21):E1342-7. PubMed ID: 23797506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MRI evaluation of lumbar spinal stenosis: is a rapid visual assessment as good as area measurement?
    Lønne G; Ødegård B; Johnsen LG; Solberg TK; Kvistad KA; Nygaard ØP
    Eur Spine J; 2014 Jun; 23(6):1320-4. PubMed ID: 24573778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.