These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Development of an instrument for assessing the quality of forensic evidence and expert testimony from three feature-comparison methods: DNA, voice, and fingerprint analysis. Villavicencio-Queijeiro A; Loyzance C; García-Castillo Z; Suzuri-Hernández J; Castillo-Alanís A; López-Olvera P; López-Escobedo F J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jan; 67(1):217-228. PubMed ID: 34596244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Communicating forensic science opinion: An examination of expert reporting practices. Bali AS; Edmond G; Ballantyne KN; Kemp RI; Martire KA Sci Justice; 2020 May; 60(3):216-224. PubMed ID: 32381238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Renegotiating forensic cultures: between law, science and criminal justice. Roberts P Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Mar; 44(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 23022585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Legal Admissibility of the Rorschach and R-PAS: A Review of Research, Practice, and Case Law. Viglione DJ; de Ruiter C; King CM; Meyer GJ; Kivisto AJ; Rubin BA; Hunsley J J Pers Assess; 2022; 104(2):137-161. PubMed ID: 35180040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions. Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(19):7733-8. PubMed ID: 21518906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of proficiency testing information and error aversions on the weight given to fingerprint evidence. Mitchell G; Garrett BL Behav Sci Law; 2019 Mar; 37(2):195-210. PubMed ID: 30883891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The development of forensic DNA analysis: New debates on the issue of fundamental human rights. Oosthuizen T; Howes LM Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jan; 56():102606. PubMed ID: 34710822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dismantling the Justice Silos: avoiding the pitfalls and reaping the benefits of information-sharing between forensic science, medicine and law. Kelty SF; Julian R; Ross A Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jul; 230(1-3):8-15. PubMed ID: 23159340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Public beliefs about the accuracy and importance of forensic evidence in the United States. Kaplan J; Ling S; Cuellar M Sci Justice; 2020 May; 60(3):263-272. PubMed ID: 32381243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Forensic facial comparison: issues of admissibility in the development of novel analytical technique. Mallett X; Evison MP J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jul; 58(4):859-65. PubMed ID: 23718761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The low prevalence effect in fingerprint comparison amongst forensic science trainees and novices. Growns B; Dunn JD; Helm RK; Towler A; Kukucka J PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0272338. PubMed ID: 35951612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preliminary investigation of the ability of fingerprint examiners in detection of sib-sib relationships based upon finger and palm prints similarities. Hefetz I; Pasternak Z; Liptz Y; Bet-Yosef M Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Aug; 337():111381. PubMed ID: 35839683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeatability and reproducibility of decisions by latent fingerprint examiners. Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e32800. PubMed ID: 22427888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Paradigms of forensic science and legal process: a critical diagnosis. Roberts P Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 370(1674):. PubMed ID: 26101282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. God's signature: DNA profiling, the new gold standard in forensic science. Lynch M Endeavour; 2003 Jun; 27(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 12798816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]