BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35033402)

  • 1. In Vivo Quantitative Ultrasound on Dermis and Hypodermis for Classifying Lymphedema Severity in Humans.
    Omura M; Saito W; Akita S; Yoshida K; Yamaguchi T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2022 Apr; 48(4):646-662. PubMed ID: 35033402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency dependence of attenuation and backscatter coefficient of ex vivo human lymphedema dermis.
    Omura M; Yoshida K; Akita S; Yamaguchi T
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2020 Jan; 47(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 31515646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In Vivo Validation of an In Situ Calibration Bead as a Reference for Backscatter Coefficient Calculation.
    Zhao Y; Czarnota GJ; Park TH; Miller RJ; Oelze ML
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2024 Jun; 50(6):833-842. PubMed ID: 38471999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ex vivo study of quantitative ultrasound parameters in fatty rabbit livers.
    Ghoshal G; Lavarello RJ; Kemmerer JP; Miller RJ; Oelze ML
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Dec; 38(12):2238-48. PubMed ID: 23062376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5.
    Zhao Y; Czarnota GJ; Park TH; Miller RJ; Oelze ML
    bioRxiv; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38370712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High-Frequency Quantitative Ultrasound for Imaging Prostate Cancer Using a Novel Micro-Ultrasound Scanner.
    Rohrbach D; Wodlinger B; Wen J; Mamou J; Feleppa E
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1341-1354. PubMed ID: 29627083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Review of Quantitative Ultrasound: Envelope Statistics and Backscatter Coefficient Imaging and Contributions to Diagnostic Ultrasound.
    Oelze ML; Mamou J
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2016 Feb; 63(2):336-51. PubMed ID: 26761606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Techniques and evaluation from a cross-platform imaging comparison of quantitative ultrasound parameters in an in vivo rodent fibroadenoma model.
    Wirtzfeld LA; Nam K; Labyed Y; Ghoshal G; Haak A; Sen-Gupta E; He Z; Hirtz NR; Miller RJ; Sarwate S; Simpson DG; Zagzebski JA; Bigelow TA; Oelze M; Hall TJ; O'Brien WD
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jul; 60(7):1386-400. PubMed ID: 25004506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Classification of Metastatic Lymph Nodes In Vivo Using Quantitative Ultrasound at Clinical Frequencies.
    Hoerig C; Wallace K; Wu M; Mamou J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2023 Mar; 49(3):787-801. PubMed ID: 36470739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-frequency ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter coefficients of in vivo normal human dermis and subcutaneous fat.
    Raju BI; Srinivasan MA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 27(11):1543-56. PubMed ID: 11750754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative assessment of in vivo breast masses using ultrasound attenuation and backscatter.
    Nam K; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
    Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Apr; 35(2):146-61. PubMed ID: 23493613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Quantitative Ultrasound-Based Multi-Parameter Classifier for Breast Masses.
    Nasief HG; Rosado-Mendez IM; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Jul; 45(7):1603-1616. PubMed ID: 31031035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterization of thyroid cancer in mouse models using high-frequency quantitative ultrasound techniques.
    Lavarello RJ; Ridgway WR; Sarwate SS; Oelze ML
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2333-41. PubMed ID: 24035621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasonic backscatter and attenuation (11-27 MHz) variation with collagen fiber distribution in ex vivo human dermis.
    Bridal SL; Fournier C; Coron A; Leguerney I; Laugier P
    Ultrason Imaging; 2006 Jan; 28(1):23-40. PubMed ID: 16924880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A multiparametric volumetric quantitative ultrasound imaging technique for soft tissue characterization.
    Deeba F; Schneider C; Mohammed S; Honarvar M; Lobo J; Tam E; Salcudean S; Rohling R
    Med Image Anal; 2021 Dec; 74():102245. PubMed ID: 34614475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative ultrasound imaging for monitoring in situ high-intensity focused ultrasound exposure.
    Ghoshal G; Kemmerer JP; Karunakaran C; Abuhabsah R; Miller RJ; Sarwate S; Oelze ML
    Ultrason Imaging; 2014 Oct; 36(4):239-55. PubMed ID: 24970857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional high-frequency backscatter and envelope quantification of cancerous human lymph nodes.
    Mamou J; Coron A; Oelze ML; Saegusa-Beecroft E; Hata M; Lee P; Machi J; Yanagihara E; Laugier P; Feleppa EJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Mar; 37(3):345-57. PubMed ID: 21316559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Backscatter coefficient estimation using tapers with gaps.
    Luchies AC; Oelze ML
    Ultrason Imaging; 2015 Apr; 37(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 25189857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative Ultrasound for Monitoring High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Treatment In Vivo.
    Ghoshal G; Kemmerer JP; Karunakaran C; Miller RJ; Oelze ML
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2016 Sep; 63(9):1234-42. PubMed ID: 26780790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Pilot Comparative Study of Quantitative Ultrasound, Conventional Ultrasound, and MRI for Predicting Histology-Determined Steatosis Grade in Adult Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.
    Paige JS; Bernstein GS; Heba E; Costa EAC; Fereirra M; Wolfson T; Gamst AC; Valasek MA; Lin GY; Han A; Erdman JW; O'Brien WD; Andre MP; Loomba R; Sirlin CB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):W168-W177. PubMed ID: 28267360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.