These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35033506)

  • 1. What Is the Perception of an Esthetic Lower Facial Third Profile in the Korean Layperson Population?
    Kim JY; Ku JK; Lee S; Huh JK; Han MD
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 May; 80(5):838-849. PubMed ID: 35033506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, dentists, and plastic surgeons for balanced facial profiles.
    Milutinovic J; Aleksic E; Avramov S; Kalevski K; Gajic M; Pejanovic D; Milic J
    J Oral Sci; 2023 Mar; 65(2):73-76. PubMed ID: 36823034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of preferred lip positions according to different age groups.
    Park NS; Park JH; Bayome M; Mo SS; Kim Y; Kook YA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 May; 42(5):637-42. PubMed ID: 23141151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facial profile study using 3-dimensional photographs to assess esthetic preferences of Hong Kong Chinese orthognathic patients and laypersons.
    Tan SK; Leung WK; Tang ATH; Zwahlen RA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Feb; 161(2):e105-e113. PubMed ID: 34531091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Self-perception of the facial profile: an aid in treatment planning for orthognathic surgery.
    Bullen RN; Kook YA; Kim K; Park JH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 72(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 24342575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile.
    Czarnecki ST; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Aug; 104(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 8338071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of profile esthetics between white and black evaluators.
    Pithon MM; Silva IS; Almeida IO; Nery MS; de Souza ML; Barbosa G; Dos Santos AF; da Silva Coqueiro R
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 23957665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of lower facial esthetics in females with different skeletal patterns].
    Zhang KK; Yang SY; Geng YD; Xiao WW; Peng HZ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 55(6):388-393. PubMed ID: 32486568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the frontal esthetic preferences in the lower facial portion of Koreans and Caucasians.
    Kang YG; Lee YH; Kook YA; Kim SH; Sinclair PM
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19582252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of African American profile esthetics.
    Hockley A; Weinstein M; Borislow AJ; Braitman LE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 22284283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of Age on Perception of Best Esthetical Profile.
    Salehi P; Azadeh N; Beigi N; Farzin M
    J Dent (Shiraz); 2019 Mar; 20(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 30937332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Esthetic evaluation of the facial profile in rehabilitated adults with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Ferrari Júnior FM; Ayub PV; Capelozza Filho L; Pereira Lauris JR; Garib DG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 73(1):169.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25511967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Esthetic perception of facial profile after treatment with the Thurow Appliance.
    Pithon MM; Lacerda-Santos R; Oliveira DL; Alves JV; Britto JP; Souza Eda S; Alves LP; Barbosa G; Coqueiro Rda S; Santos AF
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in the facial soft-tissue profile after mandibular orthognathic surgery.
    Rupperti S; Winterhalder P; Rudzki I; Mast G; Holberg C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1771-1776. PubMed ID: 30173318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The importance of using the entire face to assess facial profile attractiveness.
    Tauk A; Bassil-Nassif N; Mouhanna-Fattal C; Bouserhal J
    Int Orthod; 2016 Mar; 14(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 26867684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in facial profile and dental esthetic perceptions between young adults and orthodontists.
    Yin L; Jiang M; Chen W; Smales RJ; Wang Q; Tang L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):750-6. PubMed ID: 24880845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Esthetic perception of facial profile changes after extraction and nonextraction Class II treatment.
    Rocha AD; Casteluci CEVF; Ferreira FPC; Conti AC; Almeida MR; Almeida-Pedrin RR
    Braz Oral Res; 2020; 34():e003. PubMed ID: 32022222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of anteroposterior lip positions of the most-favored facial profiles of Korean and Japanese people.
    Ioi H; Shimomura T; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):490-5. PubMed ID: 18929266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Establishment of South Indian soft tissue cephalometric norms using profile angles and esthetic analysis.
    Biradar AK; Madanagowda SB
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e104-13. PubMed ID: 21490979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Influence of chin prominence on anterior-posterior lip positions of facial profile].
    Su YY; Wang CL; Liu DX; Dong RP; Li H
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Dec; 17(6):598-602. PubMed ID: 19148446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.