These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35034480)

  • 1. A multicenter retrospective study on 4480 implanted PICC-ports: A GAVeCeLT project.
    Bertoglio S; Annetta MG; Brescia F; Emoli A; Fabiani F; Fino M; Merlicco D; Musaro A; Orlandi M; Parisella L; Pinelli F; Reina S; Selmi V; Solari N; Tricarico F; Pittiruti M
    J Vasc Access; 2022 Jan; ():11297298211067683. PubMed ID: 35034480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A GAVeCeLT bundle for PICC-port insertion: The SIP-Port protocol.
    Brescia F; Annetta MG; Pinelli F; Pittiruti M
    J Vasc Access; 2023 Nov; ():11297298231209521. PubMed ID: 37953715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Venous access devices for the delivery of long-term chemotherapy: the CAVA three-arm RCT.
    Wu O; McCartney E; Heggie R; Germeni E; Paul J; Soulis E; Dillon S; Ryan C; Sim M; Dixon-Hughes J; Agarwal R; Bodenham A; Menne T; Jones B; Moss J
    Health Technol Assess; 2021 Jul; 25(47):1-126. PubMed ID: 34318743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PICC-PORT totally implantable vascular access device in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
    Bertoglio S; Cafiero F; Meszaros P; Varaldo E; Blondeaux E; Molinelli C; Minuto M
    J Vasc Access; 2020 Jul; 21(4):460-466. PubMed ID: 31674857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implanting totally implantable venous access ports in the upper arm is feasible and safe for patients with early breast cancer.
    Xu H; Chen R; Jiang C; You S; Zhu Q; Li Y; Li S; Zha X; Wang J
    J Vasc Access; 2020 Sep; 21(5):609-614. PubMed ID: 31841061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chest-to-arm tunneling: A novel technique for medium/long term venous access devices.
    Annetta MG; Ostroff M; Marche B; Emoli A; Musarò A; Celentano D; Taraschi C; Dolcetti L; Greca A; Scoppettuolo G; Pittiruti M
    J Vasc Access; 2023 Jan; 24(1):92-98. PubMed ID: 34148390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Totally implantable central venous access ports for long-term chemotherapy. A prospective study analyzing complications and costs of 333 devices with a minimum follow-up of 180 days.
    Biffi R; de Braud F; Orsi F; Pozzi S; Mauri S; Goldhirsch A; Nolè F; Andreoni B
    Ann Oncol; 1998 Jul; 9(7):767-73. PubMed ID: 9739444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical impact of peripherally inserted central catheters vs implanted port catheters in patients with cancer: an open-label, randomised, two-centre trial.
    Taxbro K; Hammarskjöld F; Thelin B; Lewin F; Hagman H; Hanberger H; Berg S
    Br J Anaesth; 2019 Jun; 122(6):734-741. PubMed ID: 31005243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term, totally implantable central venous access ports connected to a Groshong catheter for chemotherapy of solid tumours: experience from 178 cases using a single type of device.
    Biffi R; Corrado F; de Braud F; de Lucia F; Scarpa D; Testori A; Orsi F; Bellomi M; Mauri S; Aapro M; Andreoni B
    Eur J Cancer; 1997 Jul; 33(8):1190-4. PubMed ID: 9301441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of infections and complications in central venous catheters in adults with solid tumours.
    Coady K; Ali M; Sidloff D; Kenningham RR; Ahmed S
    J Vasc Access; 2015; 16(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 25198809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-utility analysis of centrally inserted totally implanted access port (PORT) vs. peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in the oncology chemotherapy.
    Shao G; Zhou X; Zhang S; Wu S; Dong Y; Dong Z
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():942175. PubMed ID: 35937250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A retrospective cohort study of implantable venous access port-related and peripherally inserted central catheter-related complications in patients with hematological malignancies in China.
    Lu A; Hu M; Qi X; Zhao Y; Huang Y
    SAGE Open Med; 2024; 12():20503121241257190. PubMed ID: 38826826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality of life in women with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: comparison between PICC and PICC-port.
    Pinelli F; Barbani F; Defilippo B; Fundarò A; Nella A; Selmi V; Romagnoli S; Villa G
    Breast Cancer; 2024 Sep; 31(5):945-954. PubMed ID: 38980572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patterns of use and outcomes of peripherally inserted central catheters in hospitalized patients with solid tumors: A multicenter study.
    Mitbander UB; Geer MJ; Taxbro K; Horowitz JK; Zhang Q; O'Malley ME; Ramnath N; Chopra V
    Cancer; 2022 Oct; 128(20):3681-3690. PubMed ID: 35943390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Central venous access devices for the delivery of systemic anticancer therapy (CAVA): a randomised controlled trial.
    Moss JG; Wu O; Bodenham AR; Agarwal R; Menne TF; Jones BL; Heggie R; Hill S; Dixon-Hughes J; Soulis E; Germeni E; Dillon S; McCartney E;
    Lancet; 2021 Jul; 398(10298):403-415. PubMed ID: 34297997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the Quality of Life of Patients with Breast or Colon Cancer with an Arm Vein Port (TIVAD) Versus a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC).
    Burbridge B; Lim H; Dwernychuk L; Le H; Asif T; Sami A; Ahmed S
    Curr Oncol; 2021 Apr; 28(2):1495-1506. PubMed ID: 33918869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pseudo-tunneling procedure for PICC-ports catheters insertion in patients with small veins at the middle third of the arm.
    Benvenuti S; Pintossi C; Porteri E; Gazzaneo M; Bartolini G; Schettino B; Zanatta F; Facchini F; Alberti D
    Minerva Surg; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38808916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost analysis comparison between peripherally inserted central catheters and implanted chest ports in patients with cancer-A health economic evaluation of the PICCPORT trial.
    Taxbro K; Hammarskjöld F; Juhlin D; Hagman H; Bernfort L; Berg S
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2020 Mar; 64(3):385-393. PubMed ID: 31721153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peripherally inserted central catheter versus totally implanted venous port for delivering medium- to long-term chemotherapy: A cost-effectiveness analysis based on propensity score matching.
    Wang K; Zhou Y; Huang N; Lu Z; Zhang X
    J Vasc Access; 2022 May; 23(3):365-374. PubMed ID: 33579176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The "Arm-to-Chest Tunneling" technique: A modified technique for arm placement of implantable ports or central catheters.
    Kehagias E; Tsetis D
    J Vasc Access; 2019 Nov; 20(6):771-777. PubMed ID: 30939969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.