138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35034560)
1. Clinical assessment of breast symmetry and aesthetic outcome: can 3D imaging be the gold standard?
Bai L; Lundström O; Johansson H; Meybodi F; Arver B; Sandelin K; Wickman M; Brandberg Y
J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2023; 57(1-6):145-152. PubMed ID: 35034560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of the Vectra XT three-dimensional imaging system for measuring breast volume and symmetry following oncological reconstruction.
O'Connell RL; Khabra K; Bamber JC; deSouza N; Meybodi F; Barry PA; Rusby JE
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Sep; 171(2):391-398. PubMed ID: 29872939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Vectra® XT 3D Surface Imaging Technology in Measuring Breast Symmetry and Breast Volume.
Pham M; Alzul R; Elder E; French J; Cardoso J; Kaviani A; Meybodi F
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Feb; 47(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 36149443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The potential role of three-dimensional surface imaging as a tool to evaluate aesthetic outcome after Breast Conserving Therapy (BCT).
O'Connell RL; Di Micco R; Khabra K; Wolf L; deSouza N; Roche N; Barry PA; Kirby AM; Rusby JE
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jul; 164(2):385-393. PubMed ID: 28447239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative breast volume evaluation of one-stage immediate breast reconstruction using three-dimensional surface imaging and a printed mold.
Chen K; Feng CJ; Ma H; Hsiao FY; Tseng LM; Tsai YF; Lin YS; Huang LY; Yu WC; Perng CK
J Chin Med Assoc; 2019 Sep; 82(9):732-739. PubMed ID: 31335631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and Measurement Error of Breast Volume Calculation Using Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging.
Fearn N; Meybodi F; Kilbreath S; Dylke E; Llanos C; Swanton C; Stuart K
Lymphat Res Biol; 2023 Jun; 21(3):296-303. PubMed ID: 36154463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. 3-Dimensional objective aesthetic evaluation to replace panel assessment after breast-conserving treatment.
Godden AR; O'Connell RL; Barry PA; Krupa KCD; Wolf LM; Mohammed K; Kirby AM; Rusby JE
Breast Cancer; 2020 Nov; 27(6):1126-1136. PubMed ID: 32562188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A scoring system for 3D surface images of breast reconstruction developed using the Delphi consensus process.
Godden AR; Wood SH; James SE; MacNeill FA; Rusby JE
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1580-1587. PubMed ID: 32620404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Doubling time calculations for lung cancer by three-dimensional computer-aided volumetry: effects of inter-observer differences and nodule characteristics.
Koike W; Iwano S; Matsuo K; Kitano M; Kawakami K; Naganawa S
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2014 Feb; 58(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 24304703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of analog and digitally evaluated volume of the female breast in reconstructive breast surgery. Validation of a noninvasive measurement method with 3D camera1.
Brebant V; Lemonnier L; Georgieva M; Anker A; Heine N; Seitz S; Frank K; Prantl L; Eigenberger A
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2023; 85(3):277-287. PubMed ID: 36502309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability and reproducibility of measurements in para-sagittal planes on sub-axial cervical vertebral bodies: a morphometric study of endplates in three-dimensional models.
Wang L; Luo HT; Lu W; Cai XB; Yu C; Lu S
J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Aug; 16(1):503. PubMed ID: 34399792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity and reproducibility of the 3D VECTRA photogrammetric surface imaging system for the maxillofacial anthropometric measurement on cleft patients.
Othman SA; Saffai L; Wan Hassan WN
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Aug; 24(8):2853-2866. PubMed ID: 31754872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical Assessment of Breast Volume: Can 3D Imaging Be the Gold Standard?
Killaars RC; Preuβ MLG; de Vos NJP; van Berlo CCJLY; Lobbes MBI; van der Hulst RRWJ; Piatkowski AA
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2020 Nov; 8(11):e3236. PubMed ID: 33299702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preoperative implant selection for unilateral breast reconstruction using 3D imaging with the Microsoft Kinect sensor.
Pöhlmann STL; Harkness E; Taylor CJ; Gandhi A; Astley SM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Aug; 70(8):1059-1067. PubMed ID: 28595842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration using offline analysis of the transvaginal ultrasound 'sliding sign' technique: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility.
Reid S; Lu C; Casikar I; Mein B; Magotti R; Ludlow J; Benzie R; Condous G
Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1237-46. PubMed ID: 23482338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Subjective versus objective assessment of breast reconstruction.
Henseler H; Smith J; Bowman A; Khambay BS; Ju X; Ayoub A; Ray AK
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 May; 66(5):634-9. PubMed ID: 23402935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast.
Losken A; Seify H; Denson DD; Paredes AA; Carlson GW
Ann Plast Surg; 2005 May; 54(5):471-6; discussion 477-8. PubMed ID: 15838205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional ultrasonography of the breast; An adequate replacement for MRI in neoadjuvant chemotherapy tumour response evaluation? - RESPONDER trial.
van Egdom LSE; Lagendijk M; Heijkoop EHM; Koning AHJ; van Deurzen CHM; Jager A; van Lankeren W; Koppert LB
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 104():94-100. PubMed ID: 29857873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intra- and inter-observer variability of uterine measurements with three-dimensional ultrasound and implications for clinical practice.
Saravelos SH; Li TC
Reprod Biomed Online; 2015 Oct; 31(4):557-64. PubMed ID: 26278807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Objective evaluation of the latissimus dorsi flap for breast reconstruction using three-dimensional imaging.
Henseler H; Smith J; Bowman A; Khambay BS; Ju X; Ayoub A; Ray AK
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Sep; 65(9):1209-15. PubMed ID: 22525253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
