These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35034835)

  • 1. Readability and quality of online information for patients pertaining to revision knee arthroplasty: An objective analysis.
    Murphy B; Irwin S; Condon F; Kennedy C
    Surgeon; 2022 Dec; 20(6):e366-e370. PubMed ID: 35034835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ankle conFUSION: The quality and readability of information on the internet relating to ankle arthrodesis.
    Irwin SC; Lennon DT; Stanley CP; Sheridan GA; Walsh JC
    Surgeon; 2021 Dec; 19(6):e507-e511. PubMed ID: 33451875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of the Patient Information Quality and Readability on Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) on the Internet.
    Priyanka P; Hadi YB; Reynolds GJ
    Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018; 2018():2849390. PubMed ID: 30510923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.
    Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N
    Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():139-150. PubMed ID: 33360380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
    Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Web-Based Health Information Following the Renewal of the Cervical Screening Program in Australia: Evaluation of Readability, Understandability, and Credibility.
    Mac OA; Thayre A; Tan S; Dodd RH
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jun; 22(6):e16701. PubMed ID: 32442134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Quantitative Assessment of Online Patient Education Resources.
    Gulbrandsen TR; Skalitzky MK; Ryan SE; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Brown TS; Elkins JM
    Iowa Orthop J; 2022; 42(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 36601227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality and readability of online information on hand osteoarthritis.
    Hong SW; Kang JH; Park JH; Park HJ; Kim E
    Health Informatics J; 2023; 29(1):14604582231169297. PubMed ID: 36995242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Glioblastoma: assessment of the readability and reliability of online information.
    Ahmadi O; Louw J; Leinonen H; Gan PYC
    Br J Neurosurg; 2021 Oct; 35(5):551-554. PubMed ID: 33769170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
    Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
    Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
    Ko TK; Yun Tan DJ; Hadeed S
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2024 Mar; 12(2):101695. PubMed ID: 37898304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anaesthesia for total hip and knee replacement: A review of patient education materials available online.
    Marshall R; Pomeroy E; McKendry C; Gilmartin M; McQuail P; Johnson M
    F1000Res; 2019; 8():416. PubMed ID: 33335711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Readability of Online Information for Parents Concerning Paediatric In-Toeing: An Analysis of the Most Popular Online Public Sources.
    Shet SS; Murphy B; Boran S; Taylor C
    Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e57268. PubMed ID: 38686229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Readability of Patient Educational Materials in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Has a Decade Made a Difference?
    Doinn TÓ; Broderick JM; Abdelhalim MM; Quinlan JF
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Nov; 35(11):3076-3083. PubMed ID: 32631729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Readability and quality of online information on total ankle arthroplasty.
    Hartnett DA; Philips AP; Daniels AH; Blankenhorn BD
    Foot (Edinb); 2023 Mar; 54():101985. PubMed ID: 36827889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Readability, reliability and credibility of online patient information on skin grafts.
    Heaven CL; Patel C; Ahmadi O; Mathy JA
    Australas J Dermatol; 2023 Feb; 64(1):e57-e64. PubMed ID: 36354108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of the Readability and Quality of Online Information for Patients and Their Families Regarding Schizophrenia.
    Ekinci O; Koyuncu AN
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2024 May; 212(5):278-283. PubMed ID: 38416420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An assessment of the readability and quality of elective orthopaedic information on the Internet.
    O'Neill SC; Nagle M; Baker JF; Rowan FE; Tierney S; Quinlan JF
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2014 Jun; 80(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 25090785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.