244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35035932)
21. Confounder-adjusted estimates of the risk difference using propensity score-based weighting.
Ukoumunne OC; Williamson E; Forbes AB; Gulliford MC; Carlin JB
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(30):3126-36. PubMed ID: 21170907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A comparison of entropy balance and probability weighting methods to generalize observational cohorts to a population: a simulation and empirical example.
Harvey RA; Hayden JD; Kamble PS; Bouchard JR; Huang JC
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Apr; 26(4):368-377. PubMed ID: 27859943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Propensity Score Weighting Compared to Matching in a Study of Dabigatran and Warfarin.
Seeger JD; Bykov K; Bartels DB; Huybrechts K; Schneeweiss S
Drug Saf; 2017 Feb; 40(2):169-181. PubMed ID: 27900668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Survival analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighted methods based on the generalized propensity score.
Sugihara M
Pharm Stat; 2010; 9(1):21-34. PubMed ID: 19199275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models.
Cole SR; Hernán MA
Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 168(6):656-64. PubMed ID: 18682488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Adjusting for Confounding in Early Postlaunch Settings: Going Beyond Logistic Regression Models.
Schmidt AF; Klungel OH; Groenwold RH;
Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 26436519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index.
Mitchell JD; Gage BF; Fergestrom N; Novak E; Villines TC
J Vis Exp; 2020 Jan; (155):. PubMed ID: 31984959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios.
Austin PC
Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(16):2837-49. PubMed ID: 23239115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of intergenerational exposure interventions on adolescent outcomes: An application of inverse probability weighting to longitudinal pre-birth cohort data.
Chiu YH; Rifas-Shiman SL; Kleinman K; Oken E; Young JG
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2020 May; 34(3):366-375. PubMed ID: 32162715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Robust estimation of the causal effect of time-varying neighborhood factors on health outcomes.
Robbins MW; Griffin BA; Shih RA; Slaughter ME
Stat Med; 2020 Feb; 39(5):544-561. PubMed ID: 31820833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Merits and caveats of propensity scores to adjust for confounding.
Fu EL; Groenwold RHH; Zoccali C; Jager KJ; van Diepen M; Dekker FW
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2019 Oct; 34(10):1629-1635. PubMed ID: 30215791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Regression with a right-censored predictor using inverse probability weighting methods.
Matsouaka RA; Atem FD
Stat Med; 2020 Nov; 39(27):4001-4015. PubMed ID: 32779274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Unifying instrumental variable and inverse probability weighting approaches for inference of causal treatment effect and unmeasured confounding in observational studies.
Liu T; Hogan JW
Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Mar; 30(3):671-686. PubMed ID: 33213292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used?
Leyrat C; Seaman SR; White IR; Douglas I; Smeeth L; Kim J; Resche-Rigon M; Carpenter JR; Williamson EJ
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 28573919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Covariate adjustment using propensity scores for dependent censoring problems in the accelerated failure time model.
Cho Y; Hu C; Ghosh D
Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(3):390-404. PubMed ID: 29023972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments.
Austin PC
Stat Med; 2014 Mar; 33(7):1242-58. PubMed ID: 24122911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Statistical power in parallel group point exposure studies with time-to-event outcomes: an empirical comparison of the performance of randomized controlled trials and the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) approach.
Austin PC; Schuster T; Platt RW
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Oct; 15():87. PubMed ID: 26472109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Causal Methods for Observational Research: A Primer.
Almasi-Hashiani A; Nedjat S; Mansournia MA
Arch Iran Med; 2018 Apr; 21(4):164-169. PubMed ID: 29693407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Use of stabilized inverse propensity scores as weights to directly estimate relative risk and its confidence intervals.
Xu S; Ross C; Raebel MA; Shetterly S; Blanchette C; Smith D
Value Health; 2010; 13(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 19912596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of outcome model misspecification on regression and doubly-robust inverse probability weighting to estimate causal effect.
Lefebvre G; Gustafson P
Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(2):Article 15. PubMed ID: 21969999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
