These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35036107)

  • 1. Predicting continuous ground reaction forces from accelerometers during uphill and downhill running: a recurrent neural network solution.
    Alcantara RS; Edwards WB; Millet GY; Grabowski AM
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e12752. PubMed ID: 35036107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating Running Ground Reaction Forces from Plantar Pressure during Graded Running.
    Honert EC; Hoitz F; Blades S; Nigg SR; Nigg BM
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(9):. PubMed ID: 35591027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The feasibility of predicting ground reaction forces during running from a trunk accelerometry driven mass-spring-damper model.
    Nedergaard NJ; Verheul J; Drust B; Etchells T; Lisboa P; Robinson MA; Vanrenterghem J
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e6105. PubMed ID: 30595981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sacral acceleration can predict whole-body kinetics and stride kinematics across running speeds.
    Alcantara RS; Day EM; Hahn ME; Grabowski AM
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e11199. PubMed ID: 33954039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of gait events and kinetic waveforms with wearable sensors and machine learning when running in an unconstrained environment.
    Donahue SR; Hahn ME
    Sci Rep; 2023 Feb; 13(1):2339. PubMed ID: 36759681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ground reaction force metrics are not strongly correlated with tibial bone load when running across speeds and slopes: Implications for science, sport and wearable tech.
    Matijevich ES; Branscombe LM; Scott LR; Zelik KE
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210000. PubMed ID: 30653510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spring-loaded inverted pendulum modeling improves neural network estimation of ground reaction forces.
    Kim B; Lim H; Park S
    J Biomech; 2020 Dec; 113():110069. PubMed ID: 33142204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of ground reaction force waveforms during fixed pace running outside the laboratory.
    Donahue SR; Hahn ME
    Front Sports Act Living; 2023; 5():974186. PubMed ID: 36860734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multidimensional Ground Reaction Forces and Moments From Wearable Sensor Accelerations via Deep Learning.
    Johnson WR; Mian A; Robinson MA; Verheul J; Lloyd DG; Alderson JA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2021 Jan; 68(1):289-297. PubMed ID: 32746046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of vertical ground reaction force during running using neural network model and uniaxial accelerometer.
    Ngoh KJ; Gouwanda D; Gopalai AA; Chong YZ
    J Biomech; 2018 Jul; 76():269-273. PubMed ID: 29945786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of a Torso-Mounted Accelerometer for Measures of Vertical Oscillation and Ground Contact Time During Treadmill Running.
    Watari R; Hettinga B; Osis S; Ferber R
    J Appl Biomech; 2016 Jun; 32(3):306-10. PubMed ID: 26695636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Joint kinematics and ground reaction forces in overground versus treadmill graded running.
    Firminger CR; Vernillo G; Savoldelli A; Stefanyshyn DJ; Millet GY; Edwards WB
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jun; 63():109-113. PubMed ID: 29729612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Level, Uphill, and Downhill Running Economy Values Are Correlated Except on Steep Slopes.
    Lemire M; Falbriard M; Aminian K; Millet GP; Meyer F
    Front Physiol; 2021; 12():697315. PubMed ID: 34276417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between Accelerometer and Gyroscope in Predicting Level-Ground Running Kinematics by Treadmill Running Kinematics Using a Single Wearable Sensor.
    Chow DHK; Tremblay L; Lam CY; Yeung AWY; Cheng WHW; Tse PTW
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jul; 21(14):. PubMed ID: 34300372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Principal Component Analysis of the Running Ground Reaction Forces With Different Speeds.
    Yu L; Mei Q; Xiang L; Liu W; Mohamad NI; István B; Fernandez J; Gu Y
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2021; 9():629809. PubMed ID: 33842444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A neural network method to predict task- and step-specific ground reaction force magnitudes from trunk accelerations during running activities.
    Pogson M; Verheul J; Robinson MA; Vanrenterghem J; Lisboa P
    Med Eng Phys; 2020 Apr; 78():82-89. PubMed ID: 32115354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ground reaction forces during downhill and uphill running.
    Gottschall JS; Kram R
    J Biomech; 2005 Mar; 38(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 15652542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamically adjustable foot-ground contact model to estimate ground reaction force during walking and running.
    Jung Y; Jung M; Ryu J; Yoon S; Park SK; Koo S
    Gait Posture; 2016 Mar; 45():62-8. PubMed ID: 26979885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Continuous estimation of ground reaction force during long distance running within a fatigue monitoring framework: A Kalman filter-based model-data fusion approach.
    LeBlanc B; Hernandez EM; McGinnis RS; Gurchiek RD
    J Biomech; 2021 Jan; 115():110130. PubMed ID: 33257007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Immediate effects of EVA midsole resilience and upper shoe structure on running biomechanics: a machine learning approach.
    Onodera AN; Gavião Neto WP; Roveri MI; Oliveira WR; Sacco IC
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3026. PubMed ID: 28265506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.