147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35036633)
21. Exploration and application of phenomenological RBE models for proton therapy.
Rørvik E; Fjæra LF; Dahle TJ; Dale JE; Engeseth GM; Stokkevåg CH; Thörnqvist S; Ytre-Hauge KS
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Sep; 63(18):185013. PubMed ID: 30102240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Incorporation of relative biological effectiveness uncertainties into proton plan robustness evaluation.
Ödén J; Eriksson K; Toma-Dasu I
Acta Oncol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):769-778. PubMed ID: 28464736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. WE-G-BRCD-03: Improvement in Robustness and Delivery Efficiency of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Using Single-Field Optimization with Energy Absorber.
Quan E; Liu W; Li Y; Zhang X; Zhu X; Mohan R; Wu R
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part28):3965. PubMed ID: 28519636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of robust treatment planning on single- and multi-field optimized plans for proton beam therapy of unilateral head and neck target volumes.
Cubillos-Mesías M; Baumann M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Löck S; Richter C; Stützer K
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Nov; 12(1):190. PubMed ID: 29183377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Variance-based sensitivity analysis for uncertainties in proton therapy: A framework to assess the effect of simultaneous uncertainties in range, positioning, and RBE model predictions on RBE-weighted dose distributions.
Hofmaier J; Dedes G; Carlson DJ; Parodi K; Belka C; Kamp F
Med Phys; 2021 Feb; 48(2):805-818. PubMed ID: 33210739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Introducing Proton Track-End Objectives in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Optimization to Reduce Linear Energy Transfer and Relative Biological Effectiveness in Critical Structures.
Traneus E; Ödén J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Mar; 103(3):747-757. PubMed ID: 30395906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Proton Treatment Techniques for Posterior Fossa Tumors: Consequences for Linear Energy Transfer and Dose-Volume Parameters for the Brainstem and Organs at Risk.
Giantsoudi D; Adams J; MacDonald SM; Paganetti H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Feb; 97(2):401-410. PubMed ID: 27986346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Linear energy transfer weighted beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Gu W; Ruan D; Zou W; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 32542711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of beam pruning techniques on LET and RBE in proton arc therapy.
Henjum H; Tjelta J; Fjæra LF; Pilskog S; Stokkevåg CH; Lyngholm E; Handeland AH; Ytre-Hauge KS
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1155310. PubMed ID: 37731633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Performance evaluation of adaptive aperture's static and dynamic collimation in a compact pencil beam scanning proton therapy system: A dosimetric comparison study for multiple disease sites.
Grewal HS; Ahmad S; Jin H
Med Dosim; 2021 Summer; 46(2):179-187. PubMed ID: 33279369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The influence of breathing motion and a variable relative biological effectiveness in proton therapy of left-sided breast cancer.
Ödén J; Toma-Dasu I; Eriksson K; Flejmer AM; Dasu A
Acta Oncol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):1428-1436. PubMed ID: 28826308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Superiority in Robustness of Multifield Optimization Over Single-Field Optimization for Pencil-Beam Proton Therapy for Oropharynx Carcinoma: An Enhanced Robustness Analysis.
Stützer K; Lin A; Kirk M; Lin L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Nov; 99(3):738-749. PubMed ID: 29280468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Range uncertainty in proton therapy due to variable biological effectiveness.
Carabe A; Moteabbed M; Depauw N; Schuemann J; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Mar; 57(5):1159-72. PubMed ID: 22330133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Improve the dosimetric outcome in bilateral head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy: a feasibility study.
Liu G; Li X; Qin A; Zheng W; Yan D; Zhang S; Stevens C; Kabolizadeh P; Ding X
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Jan; 15(1):21. PubMed ID: 32000817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical consequences of relative biological effectiveness variations in proton radiotherapy of the prostate, brain and liver.
Carabe A; España S; Grassberger C; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 58(7):2103-17. PubMed ID: 23470339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Incorporating variable RBE in IMPT optimization for ependymoma.
Goudarzi HM; Lim G; Grosshans D; Mohan R; Cao W
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Jan; 25(1):e14207. PubMed ID: 37985962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A Probability-Based Investigation on the Setup Robustness of Pencil-beam Proton Radiation Therapy for Skull-Base Meningioma.
Zou W; Kurtz G; Nakib M; Burgdorf B; Alp M; Li T; Lustig R; Xiao Y; Dong L; Kassaee A; Alonso-Basanta M
Int J Part Ther; 2021; 7(3):34-45. PubMed ID: 33604414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. MultiRBE: Treatment planning for protons with selective radiobiological effectiveness.
Sánchez-Parcerisa D; López-Aguirre M; Dolcet Llerena A; Udías JM
Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):4276-4284. PubMed ID: 31310683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Technical Note: A method to evaluate dosimetric effects on organs-at-risk for treatment delivery systematic uncertainties.
Liu S; Mazur TR; Fu Y; Li HH; Mutic S; Yang D
Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1552-1557. PubMed ID: 28133742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
