152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35037031)
1. Echolocating Daubenton's bats are resilient to broadband, ultrasonic masking noise during active target approaches.
Foskolos I; Bjerre Pedersen M; Beedholm K; Uebel AS; Macaulay J; Stidsholt L; Brinkløv S; Madsen PT
J Exp Biol; 2022 Feb; 225(3):. PubMed ID: 35037031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Echolocating Daubenton's bats call louder, but show no spectral jamming avoidance in response to bands of masking noise during a landing task.
Pedersen MB; Uebel AS; Beedholm K; Foskolos I; Stidsholt L; Madsen PT
J Exp Biol; 2022 Apr; 225(7):. PubMed ID: 35262171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Superfast Lombard response in free-flying, echolocating bats.
Pedersen MB; Egenhardt M; Beedholm K; Skalshøi MR; Uebel AS; Hubancheva A; Koseva K; Moss CF; Luo J; Stidsholt L; Madsen PT
Curr Biol; 2024 Jun; 34(11):2509-2516.e3. PubMed ID: 38744283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Daubenton's bats maintain stereotypical echolocation behaviour and a lombard response during target interception in light.
Uebel AS; Pedersen MB; Beedholm K; Stidsholt L; Skalshøi MR; Foskolos I; Madsen PT
BMC Zool; 2024 Apr; 9(1):9. PubMed ID: 38679717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clutter resilience via auditory stream segregation in echolocating greater mouse-eared bats.
Pedersen MB; Beedholm K; Hubancheva A; Koseva K; Uebel AS; Hochradel K; Madsen PT; Stidsholt L
J Exp Biol; 2024 Jun; 227(12):. PubMed ID: 38841890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Echolocating bats exhibit differential amplitude compensation for noise interference at a sub-call level.
Lu M; Zhang G; Luo J
J Exp Biol; 2020 Oct; 223(Pt 19):. PubMed ID: 32843365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ambient noise causes independent changes in distinct spectro-temporal features of echolocation calls in horseshoe bats.
Hage SR; Jiang T; Berquist SW; Feng J; Metzner W
J Exp Biol; 2014 Jul; 217(Pt 14):2440-4. PubMed ID: 24855671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Echo feedback mediates noise-induced vocal modifications in flying bats.
Luo J; Lu M; Luo J; Moss CF
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2023 Jan; 209(1):203-214. PubMed ID: 36266485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Echolocation behavior in big brown bats is not impaired after intense broadband noise exposures.
Hom KN; Linnenschmidt M; Simmons JA; Simmons AM
J Exp Biol; 2016 Oct; 219(Pt 20):3253-3260. PubMed ID: 27510961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ambient noise induces independent shifts in call frequency and amplitude within the Lombard effect in echolocating bats.
Hage SR; Jiang T; Berquist SW; Feng J; Metzner W
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Mar; 110(10):4063-8. PubMed ID: 23431172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Calling louder and longer: how bats use biosonar under severe acoustic interference from other bats.
Amichai E; Blumrosen G; Yovel Y
Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Dec; 282(1821):20152064. PubMed ID: 26702045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intensity control during target approach in echolocating bats; stereotypical sensori-motor behaviour in Daubenton's bats, Myotis daubentonii.
Boonman A; Jones G
J Exp Biol; 2002 Sep; 205(Pt 18):2865-74. PubMed ID: 12177150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Context-dependent effects of noise on echolocation pulse characteristics in free-tailed bats.
Tressler J; Smotherman MS
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2009 Oct; 195(10):923-34. PubMed ID: 19672604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clutter and conspecifics: a comparison of their influence on echolocation and flight behaviour in Daubenton's bat, Myotis daubentonii.
Fawcett K; Ratcliffe JM
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2015 Mar; 201(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 25552318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Noise interference with echo delay discrimination in bat biosonar.
Simmons JA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Nov; 142(5):2942. PubMed ID: 29195421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Echolocating bats emit a highly directional sonar sound beam in the field.
Surlykke A; Boel Pedersen S; Jakobsen L
Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Mar; 276(1658):853-60. PubMed ID: 19129126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evolution of high duty cycle echolocation in bats.
Fenton MB; Faure PA; Ratcliffe JM
J Exp Biol; 2012 Sep; 215(Pt 17):2935-44. PubMed ID: 22875762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Echolocation and passive listening by foraging mouse-eared bats Myotis myotis and M. blythii.
Russo D; Jones G; Arlettaz R
J Exp Biol; 2007 Jan; 210(Pt 1):166-76. PubMed ID: 17170159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Echolocation call intensity and directionality in flying short-tailed fruit bats, Carollia perspicillata (Phyllostomidae).
Brinkløv S; Jakobsen L; Ratcliffe JM; Kalko EK; Surlykke A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):427-35. PubMed ID: 21303022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reduction of emission level in approach signals of greater mouse-eared bats (Myotis myotis): No evidence for a closed loop control system for intensity compensation.
Budenz T; Denzinger A; Schnitzler HU
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194600. PubMed ID: 29543882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
