These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3503767)

  • 1. The success of in situ vein grafting: early results in comparison with the reversed vein technique.
    Najmaldin A; Clifford PC; Farrands PA; Campbell MJ; Chant AD; Webster JH
    Eur J Vasc Surg; 1987 Jun; 1(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 3503767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Long-term patency of reversed and in situ femoro-popliteal bypasses].
    Marković DM; Davidović LB; Lotina SI; Kostić DM; Cinara IS; Svetković SD; Marković M; Zivanović N
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1999; 127(11-12):365-70. PubMed ID: 10686817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In situ versus reversed saphenous vein for femoropopliteal bypass: a prospective randomized study of 100 cases.
    Watelet J; Cheysson E; Poels D; Menard JF; Papion H; Saour N; Testart J
    Ann Vasc Surg; 1987 May; 1(4):441-52. PubMed ID: 3504357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Reconstructive surgery of blood vessels of the lower extremities using the great saphenous vein in situ].
    Stepanov NV; Pargalava NSh; Shcherbakov AV
    Vestn Khir Im I I Grek; 1989 Mar; 142(3):136-40. PubMed ID: 2665302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Femoral-distal bypass with in situ greater saphenous vein. Long-term results using the Mills valvulotome.
    Donaldson MC; Mannick JA; Whittemore AD
    Ann Surg; 1991 May; 213(5):457-64; discussion 464-5. PubMed ID: 2025066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Femoro-popliteal and femoro-distal bypass: a comparison between in situ and reversed technique.
    Bergmark C; Johansson G; Olofsson P; Swedenborg J
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1991; 32(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 2010440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semi-closed, ex-situ, non-reversed or reversed autogenous vein grafting. A technique for femoro-distal arterial bypass.
    Myers KA
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1991; 32(1):110-6. PubMed ID: 2010439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Femoropopliteal in situ saphenous vein bypass: technical aspects and factors determining patency.
    Becquemin JP; Haiduc F; Labastie J; Mellière D
    Ann Vasc Surg; 1987 May; 1(4):432-40. PubMed ID: 3504356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Results from an Italian multicentric registry comparing heparin-bonded ePTFE graft and autologous saphenous vein in below-knee femoro-popliteal bypasses.
    Dorigo W; Pulli R; Piffaretti G; Castelli P; Griselli F; Dorrucci V; Ferilli F; Ottavi P; De Blasis G; Scalisi L; Monaca V; Battaglia G; Vecchiati E; Casali G; Pratesi C
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2012 Apr; 53(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 22456641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Graft type for femoro-popliteal bypass surgery.
    Mamode N; Scott RN
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD001487. PubMed ID: 10796649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The popliteal artery as inflow for distal bypass grafting.
    Brown PS; McCarthy WJ; Yao JS; Pearce WH
    Arch Surg; 1994 Jun; 129(6):596-602. PubMed ID: 8204033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Durability of the in situ saphenous vein arterial bypass: a comparison of primary and secondary patency.
    Bandyk DF; Kaebnick HW; Stewart GW; Towne JB
    J Vasc Surg; 1987 Feb; 5(2):256-68. PubMed ID: 3546739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Venous bypass in situ].
    Rozhold J; Stratinský J; Sádovský M
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 1989 Jul; 90(7):495-8. PubMed ID: 2790506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Femoropopliteal bypass: in situ or reversed vein grafts? Ten-year results of a randomized prospective study.
    Watelet J; Soury P; Menard JF; Plissonnier D; Peillon C; Lestrat JP; Testart J
    Ann Vasc Surg; 1997 Sep; 11(5):510-9. PubMed ID: 9302064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of graft type on patency of infrainguinal arterial bypass grafts.
    Neale ML; Graham JC; Lane RJ; Cheung DS; Appleberg M
    J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Feb; 178(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 8173726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Results of infrainguinal revascularization with reversed vein conduits: a modern control series.
    Mills JL; Taylor SM
    Ann Vasc Surg; 1991 Mar; 5(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 2015186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lesser saphenous vein used in situ for distal arterial bypasses.
    Shah DM
    Semin Vasc Surg; 1993 Sep; 6(3):185-7. PubMed ID: 8252247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New technique for construction of coposite Dacron vein grafts for femoro-distal popliteal bypass in the severely ischemic leg.
    Lord JW; Sadranagani B; Bajwa G; Rossi G
    Ann Surg; 1975 May; 181(5):670-5. PubMed ID: 124161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The non-reversed vein femoro-distal bypass graft: a modification of the standard in situ technique.
    Beard JD; Wyatt M; Scott DJ; Baird RN; Horrocks M
    Eur J Vasc Surg; 1989 Feb; 3(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 2714455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Additional techniques for the application of the in situ bypass.
    Buchbinder D; Melick CF
    Semin Vasc Surg; 1993 Sep; 6(3):188-92. PubMed ID: 8252248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.