These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35037730)

  • 21. Effect of elastic cavity wall and occlusal loading on microleakage and dentin bond strength.
    Pongprueksa P; Kuphasuk W; Senawongse P
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):466-75. PubMed ID: 17910223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of Shear Bond Strength and Microleakage of Various Bulk-fill Bioactive Dentin substitutes: An in vitro Study.
    Alkhudhairy FI; Ahmad ZH
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Dec; 17(12):997-1002. PubMed ID: 27965486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of dentin adhesives and liner materials on the microleakage of class II resin composite restorations in primary and permanent teeth.
    Güngör HC; Canoğlu E; Cehreli ZC
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014; 38(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 25095316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Adhesion of indirect MOD resin composite inlays luted with self-adhesive and self-etching resin cements.
    Inukai T; Abe T; Ito Y; Pilecki P; Wilson RF; Watson TF; Foxton RM
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):474-84. PubMed ID: 22360367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25.
    Rifai H; Qasim S; Mahdi S; Lambert MJ; Zarazir R; Amenta F; Naim S; Mehanna C
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2022 Jan; 14(1):e55-e63. PubMed ID: 35070125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Microleakage of four composite resin systems in class II restorations.
    Majeed A; Osman YI; Al-Omari T
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):484-8. PubMed ID: 20306869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. MARGINAL MICROLEAKAGE PROPERTIES OF ACTIVA BIOACTIVE RESTORATIVE AND NANOHYBRID COMPOSITE RESIN USING TWO DIFFERENT ADHESIVES IN NON CARIOUS CERVICAL LESIONS - AN IN VITRO STUDY.
    Kaushik M; Yadav M
    J West Afr Coll Surg; 2017; 7(2):1-14. PubMed ID: 29951462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of the marginal microleakage of a bioactive composite resin and traditional dental restorative materials.
    Adeyeye A; Spivey V; Stoeckel D; Welch D
    Gen Dent; 2023; 71(3):52-56. PubMed ID: 37083614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Marginal quality and microleakage of adhesive class V restorations.
    Manhart J; Chen HY; Mehl A; Weber K; Hickel R
    J Dent; 2001 Feb; 29(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 11239587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of radiotherapy on the microleakage of adhesive systems.
    Bulucu B; Avsar A; Demiryürek EO; Yesilyurt C
    J Adhes Dent; 2009 Aug; 11(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 19701512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Adhesion and marginal adaptation of a claimed bioactive, restorative material.
    Benetti AR; Michou S; Larsen L; Peutzfeldt A; Pallesen U; van Dijken JWV
    Biomater Investig Dent; 2019; 6(1):90-98. PubMed ID: 31998876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative evaluation of microleakage around Class V cavities restored with alkasite restorative material with and without bonding agent and flowable composite resin: An
    Meshram P; Meshram V; Palve D; Patil S; Gade V; Raut A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(3):403-407. PubMed ID: 31397416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of Microtensile Bond Strength and Microleakage of a Self-adhering Flowable Composite.
    Yuan H; Li M; Guo B; Gao Y; Liu H; Li J
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Dec; 17(6):535-43. PubMed ID: 26734678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage.
    Cenci M; Demarco F; de Carvalho R
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):603-10. PubMed ID: 16005800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorations.
    Rodrigues Junior SA; Pin LF; Machado G; Della Bona A; Demarco FF
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 20379680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of fiber inserts on gingival margin microleakage of Class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations.
    Shafiei F; Doozandeh M; Karimi V
    Gen Dent; 2018; 66(3):58-63. PubMed ID: 29714702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.