These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35038028)

  • 1. Benefit on daily listening with technological advancements: comparison of basic and premium category hearing aids.
    Prakash P; Sreedhar A; Balan JR; Varghese AM
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jun; 279(6):3179-3187. PubMed ID: 35038028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy and Effectiveness of Advanced Hearing Aid Directional and Noise Reduction Technologies for Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Chipara O; Hasan SS; DeVries S; Oleson J
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):805-822. PubMed ID: 30379683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical Performance Evaluation of a Personal Sound Amplification Product vs a Basic Hearing Aid and a Premium Hearing Aid.
    Cho YS; Park SY; Seol HY; Lim JH; Cho YS; Hong SH; Moon IJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Jun; 145(6):516-522. PubMed ID: 31095263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life III: Localization.
    Johnson JA; Xu J; Cox RM
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):746-759. PubMed ID: 28700447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life II: Speech Understanding and Listening Effort.
    Johnson JA; Xu J; Cox RM
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):529-40. PubMed ID: 27556363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of Hearing Aid Technology Level on New Hearing Aid Users.
    Hausladen J; Plyler PN; Clausen B; Fincher A; Norris S; Russell T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Mar; 33(3):149-157. PubMed ID: 34670289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of advanced hearing aid technology on speech understanding for older listeners with mild to moderate, adult-onset, sensorineural hearing loss.
    Cox RM; Johnson JA; Xu J
    Gerontology; 2014; 60(6):557-68. PubMed ID: 25139516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of Hearing Aid Technology Level and Individual Characteristics on Listener Outcome Measures.
    Plyler PN; Hausladen J; Capps M; Cox MA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Aug; 64(8):3317-3329. PubMed ID: 34256006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring Factors That Contribute to the Success of Rehabilitation With Hearing Aids.
    Lansbergen SE; Versfeld N; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2023 Nov-Dec 01; 44(6):1514-1525. PubMed ID: 37792897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):415-435. PubMed ID: 28534732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life I: The Patients' Perspective.
    Cox RM; Johnson JA; Xu J
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):e224-37. PubMed ID: 26881981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship between listening conditions and alternative amplification schemes for multiple memory hearing aids.
    Keidser G
    Ear Hear; 1995 Dec; 16(6):575-86. PubMed ID: 8747807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptive Hearing Aid Benefit in Children With Mild/Moderate Hearing Loss: A Registered, Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Stewart HJ; Cash EK; Pinkl J; Nakeva von Mentzer C; Lin L; Hunter LL; Moore DR;
    Ear Hear; 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 43(5):1402-1415. PubMed ID: 35758427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A critical review of hearing-aid single-microphone noise-reduction studies in adults and children.
    Chong FY; Jenstad LM
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Aug; 13(6):600-608. PubMed ID: 29072542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selecting Appropriate Tests to Assess the Benefits of Bilateral Amplification With Hearing Aids.
    van Schoonhoven J; Schulte M; Boymans M; Wagener KC; Dreschler WA; Kollmeier B
    Trends Hear; 2016 Jul; 20():. PubMed ID: 27460871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of noise reduction on speech intelligibility, perceived listening effort, and personal preference in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    Trends Hear; 2014 Oct; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Achieved Gain and Subjective Outcomes for a Wide-Bandwidth Contact Hearing Aid Fitted Using CAM2.
    Arbogast TL; Moore BCJ; Puria S; Dundas D; Brimacombe J; Edwards B; Carr Levy S
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):741-756. PubMed ID: 30300158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acclimatization to hearing aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24351612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.