These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35038028)

  • 21. A comparison of the benefit provided by well-fit linear hearing aids and instruments with automatic reductions of low-frequency gain.
    Humes LE; Christensen LA; Bess FH; Hedley-Williams A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Jun; 40(3):666-85. PubMed ID: 9210122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
    Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
    Oeding K; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of two digitally programmable hearing aids.
    Ricketts TA; Bentler RA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Mar; 3(2):101-12. PubMed ID: 1600212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Wireless binaural hearing aid technology for telephone use and listening in wind noise.
    Au A; Blakeley JM; Dowell RC; Rance G
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Apr; 58(4):193-199. PubMed ID: 30474445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Hearing aids: objective and subjective evaluations of linear and nonlinear amplification users].
    Costa LP; Iório MC
    Pro Fono; 2006; 18(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 16625868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Premium versus entry-level hearing aids: using group concept mapping to investigate the drivers of preference.
    Saleh HK; Folkeard P; Van Eeckhoutte M; Scollie S
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Dec; 61(12):1003-1017. PubMed ID: 34883040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hearing Instruments for Unilateral Severe-to-Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Kitterick PT; Smith SN; Lucas L
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):495-507. PubMed ID: 27232073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Implications of high-frequency cochlear dead regions for fitting hearing aids to adults with mild to moderately severe hearing loss.
    Cox RM; Johnson JA; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):573-87. PubMed ID: 22555183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Semantic context improves speech intelligibility and reduces listening effort for listeners with hearing impairment.
    Holmes E; Folkeard P; Johnsrude IS; Scollie S
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jul; 57(7):483-492. PubMed ID: 29415585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Effects of Amplification on Listening Self-Efficacy in Adults With Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Kawaguchi L; Wu YH; Miller C
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Sep; 28(3):572-582. PubMed ID: 31296020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical trials with a programmable hearing aid set for various listening environments.
    Ringdahl A; Eriksson-Mangold M; Israelsson B; Lindkvist A; Mangold S
    Br J Audiol; 1990 Aug; 24(4):235-42. PubMed ID: 2224290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effectiveness in Rehabilitation of Current Wireless CROS Technology in Experienced Bone-Anchored Implant Users.
    Snapp HA; Hoffer ME; Liu X; Rajguru SM
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):1397-1404. PubMed ID: 29135863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Efficacy of hearing-aid based telephone strategies for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 23231817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of nonlinear frequency compression on speech identification in children with hearing loss.
    Hillock-Dunn A; Buss E; Duncan N; Roush PA; Leibold LJ
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 24496288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.