139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35038876)
1. Robotic surgical staging of lymphadenectomy during pregnancy - case report.
Staňková Veronika; Pilka Radovan
Ceska Gynekol; 2021; 86(6):387-391. PubMed ID: 35038876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Para-aortic lymph node surgical staging in locally-advanced cervical cancer: comparison between robotic versus conventional laparoscopy.
Loverix L; Salihi RR; Van Nieuwenhuysen E; Concin N; Han S; van Gorp T; Vergote I
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Apr; 30(4):466-472. PubMed ID: 32079714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?
Gucer F; Misirlioglu S; Ceydeli N; Taskiran C
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28255734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single-port Robotic Pelvic Bulky Lymph Node Resection: A Case Report.
Gungor M; Takmaz O; Afsar S; Ozbasli E; Gundogan S
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1030-1031. PubMed ID: 27311875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multi-center experience of robot-assisted laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging of locally advanced cervical carcinoma.
Fastrez M; Goffin F; Vergote I; Vandromme J; Petit P; Leunen K; Degueldre M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Aug; 92(8):895-901. PubMed ID: 23590725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Indications and techniques for robotic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic oncology.
Wisner KP; Gupta S; Ahmad S; Holloway RW
J Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 112(7):782-9. PubMed ID: 26288990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study.
Tinelli R; Malzoni M; Cosentino F; Perone C; Fusco A; Cicinelli E; Nezhat F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):2622-8. PubMed ID: 21394663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical cancer complicating pregnancy: implications of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy.
Alouini S; Rida K; Mathevet P
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Mar; 108(3):472-7. PubMed ID: 18201752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopy for extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy.
Díaz-Feijoo B; Gil-Ibáñez B; Pérez-Benavente A; Martínez-Gómez X; Colás E; Sánchez-Iglesias JL; Cabrera-Díaz S; Puig-Puig O; Magrina JF; Gil-Moreno A
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):98-101. PubMed ID: 24231134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of a double docking to improve lymph node dissection: when robotically assisted laparoscopy for para-aortic lymphadenectomy is associated to a pelvic procedure.
Franké O; Narducci F; Chereau-Ewald E; Orsoni M; Jauffret C; Leblanc E; Houvenaeghel G; Lambaudie E
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 25514349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic surgical staging in cervical cancer--preliminary experience among Chinese.
Chu KK; Chang SD; Chen FP; Soong YK
Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Jan; 64(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 8995546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single-Site Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Staging Surgery for Presumed Clinically Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer.
Yoo JG; Kim WJ; Lee KH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(3):380-381. PubMed ID: 28911827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comprehensive Staging of Uterine Carcinosarcoma Using a Multiquadrant Robotic Platform.
Dellinger TH; Wakabayashi MT; Han ES
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(4):531-532. PubMed ID: 27794476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robot assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the management of advanced cervical carcinoma.
Fastrez M; Vandromme J; George P; Rozenberg S; Degueldre M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Dec; 147(2):226-9. PubMed ID: 19786318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic laparoendoscopic single site radical hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node mapping and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer.
Sinno AK; Tanner EJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Nov; 139(2):387. PubMed ID: 26307401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective investigation of fluorescence imaging to detect sentinel lymph nodes at robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging.
Paley PJ; Veljovich DS; Press JZ; Isacson C; Pizer E; Shah C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jul; 215(1):117.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26743505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Robot assisted endometrial cancer staging - evaluation the first 100 operations and comparing the first andthe last 30 operations].
Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Hambálek P; Maděrka M; Zapletalová J; Pilka R
Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Oct; 80(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 26606116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
