These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Heart failure patients monitored with telemedicine: patient satisfaction, a review of the literature. Kraai IH; Luttik ML; de Jong RM; Jaarsma T; Hillege HL J Card Fail; 2011 Aug; 17(8):684-90. PubMed ID: 21807331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient and Staff Experience of Remote Patient Monitoring-What to Measure and How: Systematic Review. Pannunzio V; Morales Ornelas HC; Gurung P; van Kooten R; Snelders D; van Os H; Wouters M; Tollenaar R; Atsma D; Kleinsmann M J Med Internet Res; 2024 Apr; 26():e48463. PubMed ID: 38648090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes of Remote Patient Monitoring for Automated Peritoneal Dialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Jung HY; Jeon Y; Kim YS; Kim DK; Lee JP; Yang CW; Ko EJ; Ryu DR; Kang SW; Park JT; Lim JH; Choi JY; Cho JH; Kim CD; Kim YL; Park SH Nephron; 2021; 145(6):702-710. PubMed ID: 34515160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient reported outcomes with remote orthopaedic consultations by telemedicine: A randomised controlled trial. Buvik A; Bugge E; Knutsen G; Småbrekke A; Wilsgaard T J Telemed Telecare; 2019 Sep; 25(8):451-459. PubMed ID: 29973130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Remote Monitoring of Patients With Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. Bashi N; Karunanithi M; Fatehi F; Ding H; Walters D J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jan; 19(1):e18. PubMed ID: 28108430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: Patient experiences and preferences for follow-up. Timmermans I; Meine M; Szendey I; Aring J; Romero Roldán J; van Erven L; Kahlert P; Zitron E; Mabo P; Denollet J; Versteeg H Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2019 Feb; 42(2):120-129. PubMed ID: 30536931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The INFluence of Remote monitoring on Anxiety/depRession, quality of lifE, and Device acceptance in ICD patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center trial. Leppert F; Siebermair J; Wesemann U; Martens E; Sattler SM; Scholz S; Veith S; Greiner W; Rassaf T; Kääb S; Wakili R Clin Res Cardiol; 2021 Jun; 110(6):789-800. PubMed ID: 32417952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient satisfaction with remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices: the VALIOSA questionnaire. Ruiz Díaz MA; Egea García M; Muñoz Aguilera R; Viñolas Prat X; Silvestre García J; Álvarez Orozco M; Martínez Ferrer J; BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Apr; 20(1):354. PubMed ID: 32334573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies. Sitzia J Int J Qual Health Care; 1999 Aug; 11(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 10501602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychometric properties of instruments measuring quality and satisfaction in mental health: A systematic review. Sanchez-Balcells S; Callarisa Roca M; Rodriguez-Zunino N; Puig-Llobet M; Lluch-Canut MT; Roldan-Merino JF J Adv Nurs; 2018 Nov; 74(11):2497-2510. PubMed ID: 30043479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and Validation of an Instrument in Spanish to Evaluate Patient Satisfaction in Telemedicine Consultation During COVID-19 Pandemic. Tovar-Martínez JI; Romero-Ibarguengoitia ME; Elvira Torres-Almaguer C Telemed J E Health; 2022 May; 28(5):736-742. PubMed ID: 34515522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Limitations of patient satisfaction studies in telehealthcare: a systematic review of the literature. Williams TL; May CR; Esmail A Telemed J E Health; 2001; 7(4):293-316. PubMed ID: 11886667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient satisfaction questionnaires for primary care out-of-hours services: a systematic review. Garratt AM; Danielsen K; Hunskaar S Br J Gen Pract; 2007 Sep; 57(542):741-7. PubMed ID: 17761062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Choice of rating scale labels: implication for minimizing patient satisfaction response ceiling effect in telemedicine surveys. Masino C; Lam TC Telemed J E Health; 2014 Dec; 20(12):1150-5. PubMed ID: 25379838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Telemedicine in orthopaedics during COVID-19 and beyond: A systematic review. Haider Z; Aweid B; Subramanian P; Iranpour F J Telemed Telecare; 2022 Jul; 28(6):391-403. PubMed ID: 32762270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient Satisfaction With a Multisite, Multiregional Remote Patient Monitoring Program for Acute and Chronic Condition Management: Survey-Based Analysis. Haddad TC; Maita KC; Inselman JW; Avila FR; Torres-Guzman RA; Coffey JD; Christopherson LA; Leuenberger AM; Bell SJ; Pahl DF; Garcia JP; Manka L; Forte AJ; Maniaci MJ J Med Internet Res; 2023 Jul; 25():e44528. PubMed ID: 37343182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients]. Jaussent S; Labarère J; Boyer JP; François P Encephale; 2004; 30(5):437-46. PubMed ID: 15627048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A flexible protocol for a systematic review of remote patient monitoring. Muller AE; Berg RC Prim Health Care Res Dev; 2020 Oct; 21():e45. PubMed ID: 33054872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]