BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35042021)

  • 1. Cost-Effectiveness of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Targeted Biopsy Versus Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review.
    Rezapour A; Alipour V; Moradi N; Arabloo J
    Value Health Reg Issues; 2022 Jul; 30():31-38. PubMed ID: 35042021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
    van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
    Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Feb; 15(1):e33-e36. PubMed ID: 27530436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study.
    Brown LC; Ahmed HU; Faria R; El-Shater Bosaily A; Gabe R; Kaplan RS; Parmar M; Collaco-Moraes Y; Ward K; Hindley RG; Freeman A; Kirkham A; Oldroyd R; Parker C; Bott S; Burns-Cox N; Dudderidge T; Ghei M; Henderson A; Persad R; Rosario DJ; Shergill I; Winkler M; Soares M; Spackman E; Sculpher M; Emberton M
    Health Technol Assess; 2018 Jul; 22(39):1-176. PubMed ID: 30040065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
    Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
    Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schoots IG; Roobol MJ; Nieboer D; Bangma CH; Steyerberg EW; Hunink MG
    Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):438-50. PubMed ID: 25480312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in aiding the localisation of prostate abnormalities for biopsy: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Mowatt G; Scotland G; Boachie C; Cruickshank M; Ford JA; Fraser C; Kurban L; Lam TB; Padhani AR; Royle J; Scheenen TW; Tassie E
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 May; 17(20):vii-xix, 1-281. PubMed ID: 23697373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transrectal ultrasound examination of prostate cancer guided by fusion imaging of multiparametric MRI and TRUS: avoiding unnecessary mpMRI-guided targeted biopsy.
    Xu G; Li JH; Xiang LH; Yang B; Chen YC; Sun YK; Zhao BH; Wu J; Sun LP; Xu HX
    Asian J Androl; 2023; 25(3):410-415. PubMed ID: 36348578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Standardized Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reporting Using the Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation Criteria and Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion with Transperineal Saturation Biopsy to Select Men on Active Surveillance.
    Dieffenbacher S; Nyarangi-Dix J; Giganti F; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Müller-Wolf MB; Schütz V; Gasch C; Hatiboglu G; Hauffe M; Stenzinger A; Duensing S; Schlemmer HP; Moore CM; Hohenfellner M; Radtke JP
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jan; 7(1):102-110. PubMed ID: 30878348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical Utility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging as the First-line Tool for Men with High Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
    Panebianco V; Valerio MC; Giuliani A; Pecoraro M; Ceravolo I; Barchetti G; Catalano C; Padhani AR
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 1(3):208-214. PubMed ID: 31102623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiparametric Prostate MRI in Biopsy-Naïve Men: A Prospective Evaluation of Performance and Biopsy Strategies.
    Krüger-Stokke B; Bertilsson H; Langørgen S; Sjøbakk TAE; Bathen TF; Selnæs KM
    Front Oncol; 2021; 11():745657. PubMed ID: 34722302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-Effectiveness Comparison of Imaging-Guided Prostate Biopsy Techniques: Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound, Direct In-Bore MRI, and Image Fusion.
    Venderink W; Govers TM; de Rooij M; Fütterer JJ; Sedelaar JPM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):1058-1063. PubMed ID: 28225639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies.
    Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Blondin D; Quentin M; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Gabbert HE; Becker N; Antoch G; Albers P; Schimmöller L
    Eur Urol; 2015 Oct; 68(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 26116294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.
    Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Schoots IG; Chiu PK; Osses DF; Tijsterman JD; Beerlage HP; Mannaerts CK; Schimmöller L; Albers P; Arsov C
    Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 30082150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Targeted Biopsy With Systematic Biopsy Alone for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Elwenspoek MMC; Sheppard AL; McInnes MDF; Merriel SWD; Rowe EWJ; Bryant RJ; Donovan JL; Whiting P
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Aug; 2(8):e198427. PubMed ID: 31390032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers.
    Hoeks CM; Schouten MG; Bomers JG; Hoogendoorn SP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Hambrock T; Vergunst H; Sedelaar JP; Fütterer JJ; Barentsz JO
    Eur Urol; 2012 Nov; 62(5):902-9. PubMed ID: 22325447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy With Systematic Transrectal Ultrasonography Biopsy for Biopsy-Naive Men at Risk for Prostate Cancer: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Klotz L; Chin J; Black PC; Finelli A; Anidjar M; Bladou F; Mercado A; Levental M; Ghai S; Chang SD; Milot L; Patel C; Kassam Z; Moore C; Kasivisvanathan V; Loblaw A; Kebabdjian M; Earle CC; Pond GR; Haider MA
    JAMA Oncol; 2021 Apr; 7(4):534-542. PubMed ID: 33538782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing Three Different Techniques for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies: A Systematic Review of In-bore versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound fusion versus Cognitive Registration. Is There a Preferred Technique?
    Wegelin O; van Melick HHE; Hooft L; Bosch JLHR; Reitsma HB; Barentsz JO; Somford DM
    Eur Urol; 2017 Apr; 71(4):517-531. PubMed ID: 27568655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR-guided targeted biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer: a modelling study from a health care perspective.
    de Rooij M; Crienen S; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO; Rovers MM; Grutters JP
    Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 24377803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.