These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35042385)
21. Quantitative and Qualitative Comparison of 4D-DSA with 3D-DSA Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations in Cerebral Aneurysms. Lang S; Hoelter P; Birkhold AI; Schmidt M; Endres J; Strother C; Doerfler A; Luecking H AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2019 Sep; 40(9):1505-1510. PubMed ID: 31467234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Denoising and spatial resolution enhancement of 4D flow MRI using proper orthogonal decomposition and lasso regularization. Fathi MF; Bakhshinejad A; Baghaie A; Saloner D; Sacho RH; Rayz VL; D'Souza RM Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2018 Dec; 70():165-172. PubMed ID: 30423501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Inter-patient variations in flow boundary conditions at middle cerebral artery from 7T PC-MRI and influence on Computational Fluid Dynamics of intracranial aneurysms. Rajabzadeh-Oghaz H; van Ooij P; Veeturi SS; Tutino VM; Zwanenburg JJ; Meng H Comput Biol Med; 2020 May; 120():103759. PubMed ID: 32421656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Hemodynamics in a giant intracranial aneurysm characterized by in vitro 4D flow MRI. Amili O; Schiavazzi D; Moen S; Jagadeesan B; Van de Moortele PF; Coletti F PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0188323. PubMed ID: 29300738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Spatial resolution and velocity field improvement of 4D-flow MRI. Callaghan FM; Grieve SM Magn Reson Med; 2017 Nov; 78(5):1959-1968. PubMed ID: 27885707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Towards quantitative evaluation of wall shear stress from 4D flow imaging. Levilly S; Castagna M; Idier J; Bonnefoy F; Le Touzé D; Moussaoui S; Paul-Gilloteaux P; Serfaty JM Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Dec; 74():232-243. PubMed ID: 32889090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Enhancement of cerebrovascular 4D flow MRI velocity fields using machine learning and computational fluid dynamics simulation data. Rutkowski DR; Roldán-Alzate A; Johnson KM Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10240. PubMed ID: 33986368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Implicit neural representations for unsupervised super-resolution and denoising of 4D flow MRI. Saitta S; Carioni M; Mukherjee S; Schönlieb CB; Redaelli A Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2024 Apr; 246():108057. PubMed ID: 38335865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Increased aneurysm wall permeability colocalized with low wall shear stress in unruptured saccular intracranial aneurysm. Wang Y; Sun J; Li R; Liu P; Liu X; Ji J; Chen C; Chen Y; Qi H; Li Y; Zhang L; Jia L; Peng F; Fu M; Wang Y; Xu M; Kong C; Xia S; Wang X; He L; Zhang Q; Chen Z; Liu A; Li Y; Lv M; Chen H J Neurol; 2022 May; 269(5):2715-2719. PubMed ID: 34731309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. High Spatiotemporal Resolution 4D Flow MRI of Intracranial Aneurysms at 7T in 10 Minutes. Gottwald LM; Töger J; Markenroth Bloch K; Peper ES; Coolen BF; Strijkers GJ; van Ooij P; Nederveen AJ AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2020 Jul; 41(7):1201-1208. PubMed ID: 32586964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Wall Shear Stress Assessment of the False Lumen in Acute Type B Aortic Dissection Visualized by 4-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Ex-Vivo Study. Veger HTC; Pasveer EH; Westenberg JJM; Wever JJ; van Eps RGS Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2021 Oct; 55(7):696-701. PubMed ID: 34078199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Validation of numerical simulation methods in aortic arch using 4D Flow MRI. Miyazaki S; Itatani K; Furusawa T; Nishino T; Sugiyama M; Takehara Y; Yasukochi S Heart Vessels; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1032-1044. PubMed ID: 28444501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Associations between haemodynamics and wall enhancement of intracranial aneurysm. Zhang M; Peng F; Tong X; Feng X; Li Y; Chen H; Niu H; Zhang B; Song G; Li Y; Liu P; Liu A; Li R Stroke Vasc Neurol; 2021 Sep; 6(3):467-475. PubMed ID: 33637615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Near-wall hemodynamic parameters quantification in in vitro intracranial aneurysms with 7 T PC-MRI. Sache A; Reymond P; Brina O; Jung B; Farhat M; Vargas MI MAGMA; 2023 Apr; 36(2):295-308. PubMed ID: 37072539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessment of hepatic arterial hemodynamics with 4D flow MRI: in vitro analysis of motion and spatial resolution related error and in vivo feasibility study in 20 volunteers. Dimov IP; Tous C; Li N; Barat M; Bomberna T; Debbaut C; Jin N; Moran G; Tang A; Soulez G Eur Radiol; 2022 Dec; 32(12):8639-8648. PubMed ID: 35731288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reconstruction and Validation of Arterial Geometries for Computational Fluid Dynamics Using Multiple Temporal Frames of 4D Flow-MRI Magnitude Images. Black SM; Maclean C; Barrientos PH; Ritos K; Kazakidi A Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2023 Oct; 14(5):655-676. PubMed ID: 37653353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of sequence type and field strength (1.5, 3, and 7T) on 4D flow MRI hemodynamic aortic parameters in healthy volunteers. Wiesemann S; Schmitter S; Demir A; Prothmann M; Schwenke C; Chawla A; von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Greiser A; Jin N; Bollache E; Markl M; Schulz-Menger J Magn Reson Med; 2021 Feb; 85(2):721-733. PubMed ID: 32754969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reproducibility and interobserver variability of systolic blood flow velocity and 3D wall shear stress derived from 4D flow MRI in the healthy aorta. van Ooij P; Powell AL; Potters WV; Carr JC; Markl M; Barker AJ J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jan; 43(1):236-48. PubMed ID: 26140480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Super-resolution 4D flow MRI to quantify aortic regurgitation using computational fluid dynamics and deep learning. Long D; McMurdo C; Ferdian E; Mauger CA; Marlevi D; Nash MP; Young AA Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 Jun; 39(6):1189-1202. PubMed ID: 36820960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]