These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35042417)

  • 1. Positive-to-negative behavioural responses suggest hedonic evaluation in treefrog mate choice.
    Höbel G; Rodríguez RL
    Proc Biol Sci; 2022 Jan; 289(1967):20211822. PubMed ID: 35042417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advertisement-call preferences in diploid-tetraploid treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor): implications for mate choice and the evolution of communication systems.
    Gerhardt HC
    Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):395-408. PubMed ID: 15807424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Progesterone and prostaglandin F2α induce species-typical female preferences for male sexual displays in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis).
    Ward JL; Love EK; Baugh AT; Gordon NM; Tanner JC; Bee MA
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Dec; 152(Pt A):280-7. PubMed ID: 26454212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Female discrimination thresholds frequently exceed local male display variation: implications for mate choice dynamics and sexual selection.
    Höbel G
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Mar; 29(3):572-82. PubMed ID: 26663413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Glucocorticoid-Mediated Changes in Male Green Treefrog Vocalizations Alter Attractiveness to Females.
    Leary CJ; Crocker-Buta S; Holloway A; Kennedy JGC
    Integr Comp Biol; 2021 Jul; 61(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 33940612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Larger females are choosier in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor).
    Kuczynski MC; Getty T; Gering E
    Behav Processes; 2017 Feb; 135():29-35. PubMed ID: 27913165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mate choice in adult female Bengalese finches: females express consistent preferences for individual males and prefer female-directed song performances.
    Dunning JL; Pant S; Bass A; Coburn Z; Prather JF
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89438. PubMed ID: 24558501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the architecture of mate choice decisions: preference functions and choosiness are distinct traits.
    Neelon DP; Rodríguez RL; Höbel G
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Feb; 286(1897):20182830. PubMed ID: 30963823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lack of phonotactic preferences of female frogs and its consequences for signal evolution.
    Velásquez NA; Valdés JL; Vásquez RA; Penna M
    Behav Processes; 2015 Sep; 118():76-84. PubMed ID: 26051194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hybrid female mate choice as a species isolating mechanism: environment matters.
    Schmidt EM; Pfennig KS
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Apr; 29(4):865-9. PubMed ID: 26717048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mate sampling influences the intensity of sexual selection and the evolution of costly sexual ornaments.
    Muniz DG; Machado G
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Jun; 447():74-83. PubMed ID: 29567325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SEXUAL SELECTION. Irrationality in mate choice revealed by túngara frogs.
    Lea AM; Ryan MJ
    Science; 2015 Aug; 349(6251):964-6. PubMed ID: 26315434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multisensory modalities increase working memory for mating signals in a treefrog.
    Zhu B; Zhou Y; Yang Y; Deng K; Wang T; Wang J; Tang Y; Ryan MJ; Cui J
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 Jun; 90(6):1455-1465. PubMed ID: 33666233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The separate and combined effects of harmonic structure, phase, and FM on female preferences in the barking treefrog (Hyla gratiosa).
    Bodnar DA
    J Comp Physiol A; 1996 Feb; 178(2):173-82. PubMed ID: 8592302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nineteen Years of Consistently Positive and Strong Female Mate Preferences despite Individual Variation.
    Ryan MJ; Akre KL; Baugh AT; Bernal XE; Lea AM; Leslie C; Still MB; Wylie DC; Rand AS
    Am Nat; 2019 Aug; 194(2):125-134. PubMed ID: 31318282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensory biases in response to novel complex acoustic signals in male and female grey treefrogs,
    Reichert MS; de la Hera I
    Proc Biol Sci; 2022 Oct; 289(1984):20221306. PubMed ID: 36196544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Categorical perception of a natural, multivariate signal: mating call recognition in túngara frogs.
    Baugh AT; Akre KL; Ryan MJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Jul; 105(26):8985-8. PubMed ID: 18577592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The evolution of experience-mediated plasticity in mate preferences.
    Fowler-Finn KD; Rodríguez RL
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Sep; 25(9):1855-63. PubMed ID: 22817109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
    Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Character displacement and the evolution of mate choice: an artificial neural network approach.
    Pfennig KS; Ryan MJ
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2007 Mar; 362(1479):411-9. PubMed ID: 17255015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.