270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35042622)
1. Normal Tissue Complication Probability Modelling for Toxicity Prediction and Patient Selection in Proton Beam Therapy to the Central Nervous System: A Literature Review.
Gaito S; Burnet N; Aznar M; Crellin A; Indelicato DJ; Ingram S; Pan S; Price G; Hwang E; France A; Smith E; Whitfield G
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2022 Jun; 34(6):e225-e237. PubMed ID: 35042622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identification of patient benefit from proton beam therapy in brain tumour patients based on dosimetric and NTCP analyses.
Dutz A; Lühr A; Troost EGC; Agolli L; Bütof R; Valentini C; Baumann M; Vermeren X; Geismar D; Timmermann B; Krause M; Löck S
Radiother Oncol; 2021 Jul; 160():69-77. PubMed ID: 33872640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the uncertainty in a normal tissue complication probability difference (∆NTCP): radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) in liver tumour patients treated with proton vs X-ray therapy.
Kobashi K; Prayongrat A; Kimoto T; Toramatsu C; Dekura Y; Katoh N; Shimizu S; Ito YM; Shirato H
J Radiat Res; 2018 Mar; 59(suppl_1):i50-i57. PubMed ID: 29538699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Model-Based Approach to Predict Short-Term Toxicity Benefits With Proton Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer.
Rwigema JM; Langendijk JA; Paul van der Laan H; Lukens JN; Swisher-McClure SD; Lin A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Jul; 104(3):553-562. PubMed ID: 30625409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Toward a model-based patient selection strategy for proton therapy: External validation of photon-derived normal tissue complication probability models in a head and neck proton therapy cohort.
Blanchard P; Wong AJ; Gunn GB; Garden AS; Mohamed ASR; Rosenthal DI; Crutison J; Wu R; Zhang X; Zhu XR; Mohan R; Amin MV; Fuller CD; Frank SJ
Radiother Oncol; 2016 Dec; 121(3):381-386. PubMed ID: 27641784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A study on predicting cases that would benefit from proton beam therapy in primary liver tumors of less than or equal to 5 cm based on the estimated incidence of hepatic toxicity.
Uchinami Y; Katoh N; Suzuki R; Kanehira T; Tamura M; Takao S; Matsuura T; Miyamoto N; Fujita Y; Koizumi F; Taguchi H; Yasuda K; Nishioka K; Yokota I; Kobashi K; Aoyama H
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol; 2022 Jul; 35():70-75. PubMed ID: 35633653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and validation of NTCP models for acute side-effects resulting from proton beam therapy of brain tumours.
Dutz A; Lühr A; Agolli L; Troost EGC; Krause M; Baumann M; Vermeren X; Geismar D; Schapira EF; Bussière M; Daly JE; Bussière MR; Timmermann B; Shih HA; Löck S
Radiother Oncol; 2019 Jan; 130():164-171. PubMed ID: 30033385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Skin Toxicity Profile of Photon Radiotherapy versus Proton Beam Therapy in Paediatric and Young Adult Patients with Sarcomas.
Gaito S; Abravan A; Richardson J; Lowe M; Indelicato DJ; Burnet N; Smith E
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2021 Aug; 33(8):507-516. PubMed ID: 33820695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Normal tissue complication probability modeling to guide individual treatment planning in pediatric cranial proton and photon radiotherapy.
Dell'Oro M; Wilson P; Short M; Hua CH; Merchant TE; Bezak E
Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 49(1):742-755. PubMed ID: 34796509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Normal tissue complication probability models in plan evaluation of children with brain tumors referred to proton therapy.
Stokkevåg CH; Indelicato DJ; Herfarth K; Magelssen H; Evensen ME; Ugland M; Nordberg T; Nystad TA; Hægeland C; Alsaker MD; Ulven K; Dale JE; Engeseth GM; Boer CG; Toussaint L; Kornerup JS; Pettersen HES; Brydøy M; Brandal P; Muren LP
Acta Oncol; 2019 Oct; 58(10):1416-1422. PubMed ID: 31364899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An in silico planning study comparing doses and estimated risk of toxicity in 3D-CRT, IMRT and proton beam therapy of patients with thymic tumours.
Lideståhl A; Mondlane G; Gubanski M; Lind PA; Siegbahn A
Phys Med; 2019 Apr; 60():120-126. PubMed ID: 31000071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modelling of late side-effects following cranial proton beam therapy.
Dutz A; Lühr A; Agolli L; Bütof R; Valentini C; Troost EGC; Baumann M; Vermeren X; Geismar D; Lamba N; Lebow ES; Bussière M; Daly JE; Bussière MR; Krause M; Timmermann B; Shih HA; Löck S
Radiother Oncol; 2021 Apr; 157():15-23. PubMed ID: 33482232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cross-modality applicability of rectal normal tissue complication probability models from photon- to proton-based radiotherapy.
Pedersen J; Flampouri S; Bryant C; Liang X; Mendenhall N; Li Z; Liu M; Muren LP
Radiother Oncol; 2020 Jan; 142():253-260. PubMed ID: 31630864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Estimated Late Toxicities between IMPT and IMRT Based on Multivariable NTCP Models for High-Risk Prostate Cancers Treated with Pelvic Nodal Radiation.
Chilukuri S; Sundar S; Patro K; Sawant M; Sivaraman R; Arjunan M; Panda PK; Sharma D; Jalali R
Int J Part Ther; 2022; 9(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 35774485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of the NTCP modeling on medical decision to select eligible patient for proton therapy: the usefulness of EUD as an indicator to rank modern photon vs proton treatment plans.
Chaikh A; Calugaru V; Bondiau PY; Thariat J; Balosso J
Int J Radiat Biol; 2018 Sep; 94(9):789-797. PubMed ID: 29878849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of an automated clinical decision system with deep learning dose prediction and NTCP model for prostate cancer proton therapy.
Chen M; Pang B; Zeng Y; Xu C; Chen J; Yang K; Chang Y; Yang Z
Phys Med Biol; 2024 May; 69(11):. PubMed ID: 38718814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical outcome after pencil beam scanning proton therapy and dysphagia/xerostomia NTCP calculations of proton and photon radiotherapy delivered to patients with cancer of the major salivary glands.
Walser MA; Bachmann N; Kluckert J; Köthe A; Tully C; Leiser D; Lomax AJ; Bizzocchi N; Langendijk JA; Weber DC
Br J Radiol; 2023 Aug; 96(1148):20220672. PubMed ID: 37129312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient selection for proton therapy using Normal Tissue Complication Probability with deep learning dose prediction for oropharyngeal cancer.
Huet-Dastarac M; Michiels S; Rivas ST; Ozan H; Sterpin E; Lee JA; Barragan-Montero A
Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 50(10):6201-6214. PubMed ID: 37140481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. NTCP modeling analysis of acute hematologic toxicity in whole pelvic radiation therapy for gynecologic malignancies - A dosimetric comparison of IMRT and spot-scanning proton therapy (SSPT).
Yoshimura T; Kinoshita R; Onodera S; Toramatsu C; Suzuki R; Ito YM; Takao S; Matsuura T; Matsuzaki Y; Umegaki K; Shirato H; Shimizu S
Phys Med; 2016 Sep; 32(9):1095-102. PubMed ID: 27567089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multivariate normal tissue complication probability models for rectal and bladder morbidity in prostate cancer patients treated with proton therapy.
Pedersen J; Liang X; Casares-Magaz O; Bryant C; Mendenhall N; Li Z; Muren LP
Radiother Oncol; 2020 Dec; 153():279-288. PubMed ID: 33096166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
