These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35042722)

  • 1. Domain-adaptive neural networks improve cross-species prediction of transcription factor binding.
    Cochran K; Srivastava D; Shrikumar A; Balsubramani A; Hardison RC; Kundaje A; Mahony S
    Genome Res; 2022 Mar; 32(3):512-523. PubMed ID: 35042722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cross-Species Prediction of Transcription Factor Binding by Adversarial Training of a Novel Nucleotide-Level Deep Neural Network.
    Zhang Q; Wang S; Li Z; Pan Y; Huang DS
    Adv Sci (Weinh); 2024 Sep; 11(36):e2405685. PubMed ID: 39076052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Virtual ChIP-seq: predicting transcription factor binding by learning from the transcriptome.
    Karimzadeh M; Hoffman MM
    Genome Biol; 2022 Jun; 23(1):126. PubMed ID: 35681170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-Cell-Type Prediction of TF-Binding Site by Integrating Convolutional Neural Network and Adversarial Network.
    Lan G; Zhou J; Xu R; Lu Q; Wang H
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Jul; 20(14):. PubMed ID: 31336830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the model transferability for prediction of transcription factor binding sites based on chromatin accessibility.
    Liu S; Zibetti C; Wan J; Wang G; Blackshaw S; Qian J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):355. PubMed ID: 28750606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contribution of Sequence Motif, Chromatin State, and DNA Structure Features to Predictive Models of Transcription Factor Binding in Yeast.
    Tsai ZT; Shiu SH; Tsai HK
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Aug; 11(8):e1004418. PubMed ID: 26291518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel convolution attention model for predicting transcription factor binding sites by combination of sequence and shape.
    Zhang Y; Wang Z; Zeng Y; Liu Y; Xiong S; Wang M; Zhou J; Zou Q
    Brief Bioinform; 2022 Jan; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 34929739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reconstructing the maize leaf regulatory network using ChIP-seq data of 104 transcription factors.
    Tu X; Mejía-Guerra MK; Valdes Franco JA; Tzeng D; Chu PY; Shen W; Wei Y; Dai X; Li P; Buckler ES; Zhong S
    Nat Commun; 2020 Oct; 11(1):5089. PubMed ID: 33037196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PlantPAN3.0: a new and updated resource for reconstructing transcriptional regulatory networks from ChIP-seq experiments in plants.
    Chow CN; Lee TY; Hung YC; Li GZ; Tseng KC; Liu YH; Kuo PL; Zheng HQ; Chang WC
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Jan; 47(D1):D1155-D1163. PubMed ID: 30395277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying transcription factors with cell-type specific DNA binding signatures.
    Awdeh A; Turcotte M; Perkins TJ
    BMC Genomics; 2024 Oct; 25(1):957. PubMed ID: 39402535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-resolution transcription factor binding sites prediction improved performance and interpretability by deep learning method.
    Zhang Y; Wang Z; Zeng Y; Zhou J; Zou Q
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Nov; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 34272562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computational prediction and characterization of cell-type-specific and shared binding sites.
    Zhang Q; Teng P; Wang S; He Y; Cui Z; Guo Z; Liu Y; Yuan C; Liu Q; Huang DS
    Bioinformatics; 2023 Jan; 39(1):. PubMed ID: 36484687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A biophysical model for analysis of transcription factor interaction and binding site arrangement from genome-wide binding data.
    He X; Chen CC; Hong F; Fang F; Sinha S; Ng HH; Zhong S
    PLoS One; 2009 Dec; 4(12):e8155. PubMed ID: 19956545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural network modeling of differential binding between wild-type and mutant CTCF reveals putative binding preferences for zinc fingers 1-2.
    Kaplow IM; Banerjee A; Foo CS
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Apr; 23(1):295. PubMed ID: 35410161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An improved ChIP-seq peak detection system for simultaneously identifying post-translational modified transcription factors by combinatorial fusion, using SUMOylation as an example.
    Cheng CY; Chu CH; Hsu HW; Hsu FR; Tang CY; Wang WC; Kung HJ; Chang PC
    BMC Genomics; 2014; 15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. PubMed ID: 24564277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. DeepTFactor: A deep learning-based tool for the prediction of transcription factors.
    Kim GB; Gao Y; Palsson BO; Lee SY
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jan; 118(2):. PubMed ID: 33372147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonconsensus Protein Binding to Repetitive DNA Sequence Elements Significantly Affects Eukaryotic Genomes.
    Afek A; Cohen H; Barber-Zucker S; Gordân R; Lukatsky DB
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Aug; 11(8):e1004429. PubMed ID: 26285121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting transcription factor binding using ensemble random forest models.
    Behjati Ardakani F; Schmidt F; Schulz MH
    F1000Res; 2018; 7():1603. PubMed ID: 31723409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhancing the interpretability of transcription factor binding site prediction using attention mechanism.
    Park S; Koh Y; Jeon H; Kim H; Yeo Y; Kang J
    Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13413. PubMed ID: 32770026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting transcription factor site occupancy using DNA sequence intrinsic and cell-type specific chromatin features.
    Kumar S; Bucher P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jan; 17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):4. PubMed ID: 26818008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.