These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35043673)

  • 1. Beyond the
    Becker AS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):523. PubMed ID: 35043673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Beyond the
    Gastounioti A; Conant EF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Jun; 216(6):1436. PubMed ID: 33295800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Beyond the
    Mullen LA; Ambinder EB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):524. PubMed ID: 35576517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of isoproterenol on the accelerated junctional rhythm observed during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal slow pathway conduction.
    Matsushita T; Chun S; Sung RJ
    Am Heart J; 2001 Oct; 142(4):664-8. PubMed ID: 11579357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patterns of accelerated junctional rhythm during slow pathway catheter ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: temperature dependence, prognostic value, and insights into the nature of the slow pathway.
    Wagshal AB; Crystal E; Katz A
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Mar; 11(3):244-54. PubMed ID: 10749347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Screening Mammography, From the
    Lamb LR; Lehman CD; Gastounioti A; Conant EF; Bahl M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):369-380. PubMed ID: 35018795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A closer look to the new frontier of artificial intelligence in the percutaneous treatment of primary lesions of the liver.
    Citone M; Fanelli F; Falcone G; Mondaini F; Cozzi D; Miele V
    Med Oncol; 2020 May; 37(6):55. PubMed ID: 32424627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identifying normal mammograms in a large screening population using artificial intelligence.
    Lång K; Dustler M; Dahlblom V; Åkesson A; Andersson I; Zackrisson S
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):1687-1692. PubMed ID: 32876835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis on synthetic mammograms from breast tomosynthesis: comparison with digital mammograms.
    Lee SE; Han K; Kim EK
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Sep; 31(9):6929-6937. PubMed ID: 33710372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Artificial Intelligence to Support Independent Assessment of Screening Mammograms-The Time Has Come.
    Lehman CD
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Oct; 6(10):1588-1589. PubMed ID: 32852516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The added value of an artificial intelligence system in assisting radiologists on indeterminate BI-RADS 0 mammograms.
    Yi C; Tang Y; Ouyang R; Zhang Y; Cao Z; Yang Z; Wu S; Han M; Xiao J; Chang P; Ma J
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Mar; 32(3):1528-1537. PubMed ID: 34528107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual and quantitative evaluation of microcalcifications in mammograms with deep learning-based super-resolution.
    Honjo T; Ueda D; Katayama Y; Shimazaki A; Jogo A; Kageyama K; Murai K; Tatekawa H; Fukumoto S; Yamamoto A; Miki Y
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 Sep; 154():110433. PubMed ID: 35834858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in cancer detection and false-positive recall in mammography using artificial intelligence: a retrospective, multireader study.
    Kim HE; Kim HH; Han BK; Kim KH; Han K; Nam H; Lee EH; Kim EK
    Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Mar; 2(3):e138-e148. PubMed ID: 33334578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retrospective analysis of the effect on interval cancer rate of adding an artificial intelligence algorithm to the reading process for two-dimensional full-field digital mammography.
    Graewingholt A; Rossi PG
    J Med Screen; 2021 Sep; 28(3):369-371. PubMed ID: 33435812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Artificial Intelligence-based Mammography Screening Protocol for Breast Cancer: Outcome and Radiologist Workload.
    Lauritzen AD; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; von Euler-Chelpin MC; Lynge E; Vejborg I; Nielsen M; Karssemeijer N; Lillholm M
    Radiology; 2022 Jul; 304(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 35438561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
    Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Beyond the
    Shah C; Chen PH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Mar; 220(3):449. PubMed ID: 35895299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. External Evaluation of 3 Commercial Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Independent Assessment of Screening Mammograms.
    Salim M; Wåhlin E; Dembrower K; Azavedo E; Foukakis T; Liu Y; Smith K; Eklund M; Strand F
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Oct; 6(10):1581-1588. PubMed ID: 32852536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Artificial Intelligence in Screening Mammography: A Population Survey of Women's Preferences.
    Ongena YP; Yakar D; Haan M; Kwee TC
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2021 Jan; 18(1 Pt A):79-86. PubMed ID: 33058789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Artificial Intelligence for Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives.
    Geras KJ; Mann RM; Moy L
    Radiology; 2019 Nov; 293(2):246-259. PubMed ID: 31549948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.