These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35044253)

  • 1. Conventional Versus Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement Surgery: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression.
    Almeida AS; Ceron RO; Anschau F; de Oliveira JB; Leão Neto TC; Rode J; Rey RAW; Lira KB; Delvaux RS; de Souza RORR
    Innovations (Phila); 2022; 17(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 35044253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved Patient Recovery With Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Surgery: A Propensity-Matched Study.
    Bruno P; Cammertoni F; Rosenhek R; Mazza A; Pavone N; Iafrancesco M; Nesta M; Chiariello GA; Spalletta C; Graziano G; Sanesi V; D'Errico D; Massetti M
    Innovations (Phila); 2019 Oct; 14(5):419-427. PubMed ID: 31431105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity-Matched Study From the UK National Data.
    Attia RQ; Hickey GL; Grant SW; Bridgewater B; Roxburgh JC; Kumar P; Ridley P; Bhabra M; Millner RW; Athanasiou T; Casula R; Chukwuemka A; Pillay T; Young CP
    Innovations (Phila); 2016; 11(1):15-23; discussion 23. PubMed ID: 26926521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgical outcomes of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via right mini-thoracotomy for hemodialysis patients.
    Ito Y; Nakamura Y; Yasumoto Y; Yoshiyama D; Kuroda M; Nishijima S; Nakayama T; Tsuruta R; Narita T
    Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 May; 70(5):439-444. PubMed ID: 34676484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of cardiopulmonary bypass set-up and management on clinical outcomes after minimally invasive aortic valve surgery.
    Cammertoni F; Bruno P; Pavone N; Farina P; Mazza A; Iafrancesco M; Nesta M; Chiariello GA; Spalletta C; Cavaliere F; Calabrese M; D'Angelo GA; Sanesi V; Conti F; D'Errico D; Massetti M
    Perfusion; 2021 Oct; 36(7):679-687. PubMed ID: 34080484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Transcatheter, Minimally Invasive, and Conventional Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Fong KY; Yap JJL; Chan YH; Ewe SH; Chao VTT; Amanullah MR; Govindasamy SP; Aziz ZA; Tan VH; Ho KW
    Am J Cardiol; 2023 May; 195():45-56. PubMed ID: 37011554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a 10-year experience.
    Korach A; Shemin RJ; Hunter CT; Bao Y; Shapira OM
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2010 Jun; 51(3):417-21. PubMed ID: 20523293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Propensity matched analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional isolated aortic valve replacement.
    Oo S; Khan A; Chan J; Juneja S; Caputo M; Angelini G; Rajakaruna C; Vohra HA
    Perfusion; 2023 Mar; 38(2):261-269. PubMed ID: 34515578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis.
    Gilmanov D; Bevilacqua S; Murzi M; Cerillo AG; Gasbarri T; Kallushi E; Miceli A; Glauber M
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Sep; 96(3):837-43. PubMed ID: 23866805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Surgery in Octogenarians: Reliable Option or Fallback Solution?
    Cammertoni F; Bruno P; Rosenhek R; Pavone N; Farina P; Mazza A; Iafrancesco M; Nesta M; Chiariello GA; Comerci G; Pasquini A; Cavaliere F; Guarneri S; Marzetti E; Rabini A; Piarulli A; Sanesi V; D'Errico D; Massetti M
    Innovations (Phila); 2021; 16(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 33320024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive surgical aortic valve replacement.
    Jahangiri M; Hussain A; Akowuah E
    Heart; 2019 Mar; 105(Suppl 2):s10-s15. PubMed ID: 30846519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement in Obese Patients: A Propensity-Matched Study.
    Cammertoni F; Bruno P; Pavone N; Nesta M; Chiariello GA; Grandinetti M; D'Avino S; Sanesi V; D'Errico D; Massetti M
    Braz J Cardiovasc Surg; 2024 Mar; 39(2):e20230159. PubMed ID: 38426432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Veterans Affairs Heart Team Experience With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Minimally Invasive Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Liang NE; Wisneski AD; Wang SX; Shunk KA; Wozniak CJ; Yang J; Zimmet JM; Ge L; Tseng EE
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 31(8):217-222. PubMed ID: 31088993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid deployment or sutureless versus conventional bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: A meta-analysis.
    Sohn SH; Jang MJ; Hwang HY; Kim KH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Jun; 155(6):2402-2412.e5. PubMed ID: 29548584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally Invasive Approaches to Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis.
    Chang C; Raza S; Altarabsheh SE; Delozier S; Sharma UM; Zia A; Khan MS; Neudecker M; Markowitz AH; Sabik JF; Deo SV
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2018 Dec; 106(6):1881-1889. PubMed ID: 30189193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [MINIMALLY INVASIVE AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT].
    Tabata M
    Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Mar; 117(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 27295772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conventional versus minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: pooled analysis of propensity-matched data.
    Lim JY; Deo SV; Altarabsheh SE; Jung SH; Erwin PJ; Markowitz AH; Park SJ
    J Card Surg; 2015 Feb; 30(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 25533177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of aortic valve replacement via an anterior right minithoracotomy with standard sternotomy: a propensity score analysis of 492 patients.
    Bowdish ME; Hui DS; Cleveland JD; Mack WJ; Sinha R; Ranjan R; Cohen RG; Baker CJ; Cunningham MJ; Barr ML; Starnes VA
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Feb; 49(2):456-63. PubMed ID: 25750007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Facilitating technologies in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis.
    Plestis K; Orlov O; Shah VN; Wong J; Thomas M; Aharon A; Orlov C; Panagopoulos G; Goldman S
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 Aug; 27(2):202-207. PubMed ID: 29547910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.