These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35044289)

  • 21. Quality of harness fit for normal and low birthweight infants observed among newborns in infant car seats.
    Brown J; Sinn JK; Chua A; Clarke EC
    Inj Prev; 2017 Apr; 23(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 27421745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The performance of various rear facing child restraint systems in a frontal crash.
    Sherwood CP; Abdelilah Y; Crandall JR; Stevens SL; Saggese JM; Eichelberger MR
    Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med; 2004; 48():303-21. PubMed ID: 15319132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pediatric occupant human body model kinematic and kinetic response variation to changes in seating posture in simulated frontal impacts - with and without automatic emergency braking.
    Maheshwari J; Sarfare S; Falciani C; Belwadi A
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(sup1):S49-S53. PubMed ID: 33095067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The impact of new legislation on child restraint system (CRS) misuse and inappropriate use in Australia.
    Koppel S; Charlton JL; Rudin-Brown CM
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 23531262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Methods to mitigate injury to toddlers in near-side impact crashes.
    Kapoor T; Altenhof W; Howard A; Rasico J; Zhu F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Nov; 40(6):1880-92. PubMed ID: 19068290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improved protection for children in forward-facing restraints during side impacts.
    Bilston LE; Brown J; Kelly P
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Jun; 6(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 16019399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Second-row occupant responses with and without intrusion in rear sled and crash tests.
    Parenteau CS; Viano DC; Burnett R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 33289580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Differences in the kinematics of booster-seated pediatric occupants using two different car seats.
    Juste-Lorente O; Maza M; Lorente AI; Lopez-Valdes FJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 28594247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Child Restraint Fitting Stations reduce incorrect restraint use among child occupants.
    Brown J; Finch CF; Hatfield J; Bilston LE
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):1128-33. PubMed ID: 21376910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Head impact mechanisms of a child occupant seated in a child restraint system as determined by impact testing.
    Yoshida R; Okada H; Nomura M; Mizuno K; Tanaka Y; Hosokawa N
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2011 Nov; 55():117-39. PubMed ID: 22869307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effects of tethering rear -facing child restraint systems on ATD responses.
    Manary MA; Reed MP; Klinich KD; Ritchie NL; Schneider LW
    Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med; 2006; 50():397-410. PubMed ID: 16968650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Responses of the Q6/Q6s ATD Positioned in Booster Seats in the Far-Side Seat Location of Side Impact Passenger Car and Sled Tests.
    Tylko S; Bohman K; Bussières A
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2015 Nov; 59():313-35. PubMed ID: 26660749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Responses of the scaled pediatric human body model in the rear- and forward-facing child seats in simulated frontal motor vehicle crashes.
    Belwadi A; Sarfare S; Tushak S; Maheshwari J; Menon S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S143-S144. PubMed ID: 31725355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Wheelchair integrated occupant restraints: feasibility in frontal impact.
    VanRoosmalen L; Bertocci GE; Ha D; Karg P
    Med Eng Phys; 2001 Dec; 23(10):687-98. PubMed ID: 11801410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Rear seat restraint system optimization for older children in frontal crashes.
    Hu J; Wu J; Reed MP; Klinich KD; Cao L
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 23859119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Booster cushion design effects on child occupant kinematics and loading assessed using the PIPER 6-year-old HBM and the Q10 ATD in frontal impacts.
    Bohman K; Östh J; Jakobsson L; Stockman I; Wimmerstedt M; Wallin H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(sup1):S25-S30. PubMed ID: 32816572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Variations in occupant response with seat belt slack and anchor location during moderate frontal impacts.
    Siegmund GP; Chimich DD; Heinrichs BE; DeMarco AL; Brault JR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Mar; 6(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 15823873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Head impact contact points for restrained child occupants.
    Arbogast KB; Wozniak S; Locey CM; Maltese MR; Zonfrillo MR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 22458796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Vehicle LATCH system features associated with correct child restraint installations.
    Klinich KD; Flannagan CA; Jermakian JS; McCartt AT; Manary MA; Moore JL; Wells JK
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(5):520-31. PubMed ID: 23683089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of child restraint system features on installation errors.
    Klinich KD; Manary MA; Flannagan CA; Ebert SM; Malik LA; Green PA; Reed MP
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Mar; 45(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 23731627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.