191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35044515)
1. Completely minimally invasive versus hybrid Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy for oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junctional cancer: a UK multi-centre comparative study.
Patel K; Askari A; Abbassi O; Jayanthi NV; Claydon O; Laycock J; Ramalingam A; Kumar B; Wong J; Aly M; Jambulingam P;
Surg Endosc; 2022 Aug; 36(8):5822-5832. PubMed ID: 35044515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis and McKeown oesophagectomy in Chinese patients with stage IA-IIIB oesophageal squamous cell cancer: a multicentre, non-interventional and observational study.
Zhang T; Hou X; Li Y; Fu X; Liu L; Xu L; Liu Y
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 30(6):812-819. PubMed ID: 32285107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes after totally minimally invasive versus hybrid and open Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: results from the International Esodata Study Group.
van der Wilk BJ; Hagens ERC; Eyck BM; Gisbertz SS; van Hillegersberg R; Nafteux P; Schröder W; Nilsson M; Wijnhoven BPL; Lagarde SM; van Berge Henegouwen MI;
Br J Surg; 2022 Feb; 109(3):283-290. PubMed ID: 35024794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].
Zhou JM; Jing SJ; Lu QT; Chu X; Xue T
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 44(6):577-580. PubMed ID: 35754233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A safe and reproducible anastomotic technique for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: the circular-stapled anastomosis with the trans-oral anvil.
Campos GM; Jablons D; Brown LM; Ramirez RM; Rabl C; Theodore P
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2010 Jun; 37(6):1421-6. PubMed ID: 20153660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A pilot randomized controlled trial on the utility of gastric conditioning in the prevention of esophagogastric anastomotic leak after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. The APIL_2013 Trial.
Mils K; Miró M; Farran L; Videla S; Alba E; Estremiana F; Bettonica C; Aranda H
Int J Surg; 2022 Oct; 106():106921. PubMed ID: 36116675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A long-term follow-up study of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with linear stapled anastomosis.
Okabe H; Tsunoda S; Sunagawa H; Saji M; Hirai K; Nakau M; Tanaka E; Obama K
Surg Endosc; 2022 Mar; 36(3):1979-1988. PubMed ID: 33837477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing open and minimally invasive surgical procedures for oesophagectomy in the treatment of cancer: the ROMIO (Randomised Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open) feasibility study and pilot trial.
Metcalfe C; Avery K; Berrisford R; Barham P; Noble SM; Fernandez AM; Hanna G; Goldin R; Elliott J; Wheatley T; Sanders G; Hollowood A; Falk S; Titcomb D; Streets C; Donovan JL; Blazeby JM
Health Technol Assess; 2016 Jun; 20(48):1-68. PubMed ID: 27373720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Non-inferiority of minimally invasive oesophagectomy: an 8-year retrospective case series.
Findlay L; Yao C; Bennett DH; Byrom R; Davies N
Surg Endosc; 2017 Sep; 31(9):3681-3689. PubMed ID: 28078465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Intrathoracic Anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): Promising Results in 100 Consecutive Patients (the European Experience).
van der Sluis PC; Tagkalos E; Hadzijusufovic E; Babic B; Uzun E; van Hillegersberg R; Lang H; Grimminger PP
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Jan; 25(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 32072382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre.
Sihag S; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Lanuti M; Allan JS; Mathisen DJ; Morse CR
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 Sep; 42(3):430-7. PubMed ID: 22345284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Overall morbidity after total minimally invasive keyhole oesophagectomy versus hybrid oesophagectomy (the MICkey trial): study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial.
Klotz R; Diener MK; Schmidt T; Hackert T; Graf S; Fuchs HF; Grimminger P; Egberts JH; Gockel I; van der Sluis PC; Doerr-Harim C; Klose C; Feißt M; Mihaljevic AL
Trials; 2023 Mar; 24(1):175. PubMed ID: 36899404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Technical and early outcomes of Ivor Lewis minimally invasive oesophagectomy for gastric tube construction in the thoracic cavity.
Wu W; Zhu Q; Chen L; Liu J
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2014 Jan; 18(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 24144805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopically assisted versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer-the Randomised Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open (ROMIO) study: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (RCT).
Brierley RC; Gaunt D; Metcalfe C; Blazeby JM; Blencowe NS; Jepson M; Berrisford RG; Avery KNL; Hollingworth W; Rice CT; Moure-Fernandez A; Wong N; Nicklin J; Skilton A; Boddy A; Byrne JP; Underwood T; Vohra R; Catton JA; Pursnani K; Melhado R; Alkhaffaf B; Krysztopik R; Lamb P; Culliford L; Rogers C; Howes B; Chalmers K; Cousins S; Elliott J; Donovan J; Heys R; Wickens RA; Wilkerson P; Hollowood A; Streets C; Titcomb D; Humphreys ML; Wheatley T; Sanders G; Ariyarathenam A; Kelly J; Noble F; Couper G; Skipworth RJE; Deans C; Ubhi S; Williams R; Bowrey D; Exon D; Turner P; Daya Shetty V; Chaparala R; Akhtar K; Farooq N; Parsons SL; Welch NT; Houlihan RJ; Smith J; Schranz R; Rea N; Cooke J; Williams A; Hindmarsh C; Maitland S; Howie L; Barham CP
BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e030907. PubMed ID: 31748296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy is a feasible and safe approach for patients with oesophageal cancer.
Mei X; Xu M; Guo M; Xie M; Liu C; Wang Z
ANZ J Surg; 2016 Apr; 86(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 25962993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.
Biere SS; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Maas KW; Bonavina L; Rosman C; Garcia JR; Gisbertz SS; Klinkenbijl JH; Hollmann MW; de Lange ES; Bonjer HJ; van der Peet DL; Cuesta MA
Lancet; 2012 May; 379(9829):1887-92. PubMed ID: 22552194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Efficacy comparison of Sweet versus Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in the treatment of middle-lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].
Yang X; Zhan C; Sun F; Chen L; Shi M; Jiang W; Wang Q
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):979-984. PubMed ID: 27680063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive techniques for transthoracic oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Siaw-Acheampong K; Kamarajah SK; Gujjuri R; Bundred JR; Singh P; Griffiths EA
BJS Open; 2020 Oct; 4(5):787-803. PubMed ID: 32894001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
