These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35044606)

  • 1. Estimating the economic cost of setting up a nuclear power plant at Rooppur in Bangladesh.
    Goswami GG; Rahman U; Chowdhury M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(23):35073-35095. PubMed ID: 35044606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of nuclear power on CO₂ emission from power plant sector in Iran.
    Kargari N; Mastouri R
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2011 Jan; 18(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 21061076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomass pellets for power generation in India: a techno-economic evaluation.
    Purohit P; Chaturvedi V
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Oct; 25(29):29614-29632. PubMed ID: 30141169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Solar-driven Dish Stirling System for sustainable power generation in Bangladesh: A case study in Cox's Bazar.
    Hossain MS; Ihsan Rahat MA; Khan MSH; Salehin S; Karim MR
    Heliyon; 2023 Mar; 9(3):e14322. PubMed ID: 36938446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analytical hierarchy process and economic analysis for optimal renewable sites in Bangladesh.
    Amin IK; Islam MN; Jaman A; Hasan MK; Parvez SH; Shajid MSS
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Aug; 30(40):92332-92358. PubMed ID: 37488382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the most likely low-emission electricity production systems in Estonia.
    Baird ZS; Neshumayev D; Järvik O; Powell KM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261780. PubMed ID: 34968401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Power to gas: an option for 2060 high penetration rate of renewable energy scenario of China.
    Zhang Y; Zhang X; Feng S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jan; 29(5):6857-6870. PubMed ID: 34460086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can hybrid solar-fossil power plants mitigate CO2 at lower cost than PV or CSP?
    Moore J; Apt J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Mar; 47(6):2487-93. PubMed ID: 23379665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analytic assessment of renewable potential in Northeast India and impact of their exploitation on environment and economy.
    Acharya S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Apr; 29(20):29704-29718. PubMed ID: 34994939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Technical-economic and environmental protection performance evaluation of a novel hybrid solar-nuclear thermally coupled power and desalination plant.
    Wang G; Li D; Lin J; Gao C
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Sep; 30(41):94639-94648. PubMed ID: 37535286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sourcing of Steam and Electricity for Carbon Capture Retrofits.
    Supekar SD; Skerlos SJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 51(21):12908-12917. PubMed ID: 28968494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative analysis of solar module configuration and tracking systems for enhanced energy generation in South Sakucia Union, Bhola, Bangladesh: A software based analysis.
    Oyshei KR; Hasan KMS; Sadat N; Hoque MA
    Heliyon; 2024 Jul; 10(13):e33884. PubMed ID: 39071609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the capacity of renewable power production for green energy system: a way forward towards zero carbon electrification.
    Chien F; Ngo QT; Hsu CC; Chau KY; Mohsin M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Dec; 28(46):65960-65973. PubMed ID: 34327644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decadal emission estimates of carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitric oxide emissions from coal burning in electric power generation plants in India.
    Mittal ML; Sharma C; Singh R
    Environ Monit Assess; 2014 Oct; 186(10):6857-66. PubMed ID: 25004854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reassessing the Efficiency Penalty from Carbon Capture in Coal-Fired Power Plants.
    Supekar SD; Skerlos SJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 49(20):12576-84. PubMed ID: 26422409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Health care during electricity failure: The hidden costs.
    Mechtenberg A; McLaughlin B; DiGaetano M; Awodele A; Omeeboh L; Etwalu E; Nanjula L; Musaazi M; Shrime M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0235760. PubMed ID: 33147212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of the size and cost reduction on a discounted payback period and levelized cost of energy of a zero-export photovoltaic system with green hydrogen storage.
    Barbosa R; Escobar B; Sánchez VM; Ortegón J
    Heliyon; 2023 Jun; 9(6):e16707. PubMed ID: 37287605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Viability of power distribution in India - Challenges and Way Forward.
    Das SD; Srikanth R
    Energy Policy; 2020 Dec; 147():111882. PubMed ID: 33100473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Economic Feasibility Study of a Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Integration Project in an Oil-Driven Economy: The Case of the State of Kuwait.
    Naseeb A; Ramadan A; Al-Salem SM
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 May; 19(11):. PubMed ID: 35682073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electricity generation: options for reduction in carbon emissions.
    Whittington HW
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1653-68. PubMed ID: 12460490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.