These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35045838)

  • 21. What Is the Accuracy of Three Different Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Clinical Outcomes After Shoulder Arthroplasty?
    Kumar V; Roche C; Overman S; Simovitch R; Flurin PH; Wright T; Zuckerman J; Routman H; Teredesai A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Oct; 478(10):2351-2363. PubMed ID: 32332242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predicting patient-reported outcomes following hip and knee replacement surgery using supervised machine learning.
    Huber M; Kurz C; Leidl R
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 30621670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Most-Cited Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Within Otolaryngology-Revisiting the Minimal Clinically Important Difference: A Review.
    Peterson AM; Miller B; Ioerger P; Hentati F; Doering MM; Kallogjeri D; Piccirillo JF
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Mar; 149(3):261-276. PubMed ID: 36729451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Crosswalks Between Knee and Hip Arthroplasty Short Forms: HOOS/KOOS JR and Oxford.
    Polascik BA; Hidaka C; Thompson MC; Tong-Ngork S; Wagner JL; Plummer O; Lyman S
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Jun; 102(11):983-990. PubMed ID: 32187121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Changes Over a Decade in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Minimal Clinically Important Difference Reporting in Total Joint Arthroplasty.
    Goldberg B; Deckey DG; Verhey JT; Christopher ZK; Spangehl MJ; Clarke HD; Bingham JS
    Arthroplast Today; 2023 Apr; 20():101096. PubMed ID: 36923058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Impact of Machine Learning on Total Joint Arthroplasty Patient Outcomes: A Systemic Review.
    Karlin EA; Lin CC; Meftah M; Slover JD; Schwarzkopf R
    J Arthroplasty; 2023 Oct; 38(10):2085-2095. PubMed ID: 36441039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Machine Learning Algorithms Can Use Wearable Sensor Data to Accurately Predict Six-Week Patient-Reported Outcome Scores Following Joint Replacement in a Prospective Trial.
    Bini SA; Shah RF; Bendich I; Patterson JT; Hwang KM; Zaid MB
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Oct; 34(10):2242-2247. PubMed ID: 31439405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The oxford knee score minimal clinically important difference for revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Khow YZ; Liow MHL; Goh GS; Chen JY; Lo NN; Yeo SJ
    Knee; 2021 Oct; 32():211-217. PubMed ID: 34509827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Can the minimal clinically important difference be determined in a French-speaking population with primary hip replacement using one PROM item and the Anchor strategy?
    Putman S; Dartus J; Migaud H; Pasquier G; Girard J; Preda C; Duhamel A
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 May; 107(3):102830. PubMed ID: 33524632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of the "Minimal Clinically Important Difference" (MCID) of the KOOS, KSS and SF-12 scores after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy.
    Jacquet C; Pioger C; Khakha R; Steltzlen C; Kley K; Pujol N; Ollivier M
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Mar; 29(3):820-826. PubMed ID: 32342141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Navigated and Robot-Assisted Technology in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Do Outcome Differences Achieve Minimal Clinically Important Difference?
    Arshi A; Sekimura T; Kelley BV; Zeegen EN; Lonner JH; Stavrakis AI
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Aug; 37(8):1562-1569. PubMed ID: 35367335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Poor Knee-specific and Generic Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores at 6 Months Are Associated With Early Revision Knee Arthroplasty: A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Ackerman IN; Harris IA; Cashman K; Rowden N; Lorimer M; Graves SE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 480(10):1899-1909. PubMed ID: 35901436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Early patient-reported outcomes from primary hip and knee arthroplasty have improved over the past seven years : an analysis of the NHS PROMs dataset.
    Sabah SA; Knight R; Alvand A; Beard DJ; Price AJ
    Bone Joint J; 2022 Jun; 104-B(6):687-695. PubMed ID: 35638211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Paradox of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Should We Prioritize "Feeling Better" or "Feeling Good" After Total Knee Arthroplasty?
    Goh GS; Baker CM; Tarabichi S; Clark SC; Austin MS; Lonner JH
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Sep; 37(9):1751-1758. PubMed ID: 35436528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Patient experiences with patient-reported outcome measures: an interview study of patients undergoing total hip- and knee arthroplasty.
    Mikkelsen LB; Wedderkopp N; Mose LS
    J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2023 Mar; 7(1):19. PubMed ID: 36862315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Radiographic Indices Are Not Predictive of Clinical Outcomes Among 1735 Patients Indicated for Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: A Machine Learning Analysis.
    Ramkumar PN; Karnuta JM; Haeberle HS; Sullivan SW; Nawabi DH; Ranawat AS; Kelly BT; Nwachukwu BU
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Oct; 48(12):2910-2918. PubMed ID: 32924530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. What Are the All-Cause Survivorship Rates and Functional Outcomes in Patients Younger Than 55 Years Undergoing Primary Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review.
    Paul RW; Osman A; Clements A; Tjoumakaris FP; Lonner JH; Freedman KB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Mar; 480(3):507-522. PubMed ID: 34846307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Changes in Patient Reported Outcome Measure Scores From Initial Presentation to Day-of-Surgery in Patients Undergoing Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.
    Shaw JH; Swantek A; Lindsay-Rivera K; Rahman TM; Davis JJ; Makhni EC
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Dec; 37(12):2340-2346. PubMed ID: 35675858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Patient-reported outcome differences for navigated and robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty frequently do not achieve clinically important differences: a systematic review.
    Lawrence KW; Rajahraman V; Meftah M; Rozell JC; Schwarzkopf R; Arshi A
    Hip Int; 2024 Apr; ():11207000241241797. PubMed ID: 38566302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Arthroplasty Candidacy Help Engine tool to select candidates for hip and knee replacement surgery: development and economic modelling.
    Price A; Smith J; Dakin H; Kang S; Eibich P; Cook J; Gray A; Harris K; Middleton R; Gibbons E; Benedetto E; Smith S; Dawson J; Fitzpatrick R; Sayers A; Miller L; Marques E; Gooberman-Hill R; Blom A; Judge A; Arden N; Murray D; Glyn-Jones S; Barker K; Carr A; Beard D
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jun; 23(32):1-216. PubMed ID: 31287051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.