These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35045842)

  • 1. Finite element stress analysis of the bearing component and bone resected surfaces for total ankle replacement with different implant material combinations.
    Yu J; Zhao D; Chen WM; Chu P; Wang S; Zhang C; Huang J; Wang X; Ma X
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Jan; 23(1):70. PubMed ID: 35045842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Malalignment of the total ankle replacement increases peak contact stresses on the bone-implant interface: a finite element analysis.
    van Hoogstraten SWG; Hermus J; Loenen ACY; Arts JJ; van Rietbergen B
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 May; 23(1):463. PubMed ID: 35581630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone remodelling around the tibia due to total ankle replacement: effects of implant material and implant-bone interfacial conditions.
    Mondal S; Ghosh R
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 Dec; 22(16):1247-1257. PubMed ID: 31497997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Total ankle replacement design and positioning affect implant-bone micromotion and bone strains.
    Sopher RS; Amis AA; Calder JD; Jeffers JRT
    Med Eng Phys; 2017 Apr; 42():80-90. PubMed ID: 28233732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Finite Element Study of Implant Subsidence and Medial Tilt in Agility Ankle Replacement.
    Cui Y; Hu P; Wei N; Cheng X; Chang W; Chen W
    Med Sci Monit; 2018 Feb; 24():1124-1131. PubMed ID: 29472522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Finite element analysis of bone-prosthesis interface micromotion for cementless talar component fixation through critical loading conditions.
    Moideen ISM; Lim CT; Yeow RCH; Chong DYR
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2020 Mar; 36(3):e3310. PubMed ID: 31943841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of joint load, motions and contact stress and bone-implant interface micromotion of three implant designs for total ankle arthroplasty.
    Zhang Y; Chen Z; Zhao H; Zhao D; Zhang X; Ma X; Jin Z
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Aug; 223():106976. PubMed ID: 35785557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Finite element analysis of artificial ankle elastic improved inserts].
    Xu Z; Li Y; Zou G; Jin Y; Rao J; Tian S
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Nov; 37(11):1361-1369. PubMed ID: 37987045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite-element analysis of the influence of tibial implant fixation design of total ankle replacement on bone-implant interfacial biomechanical performance.
    Yu J; Zhang C; Chen WM; Zhao D; Chu P; Wang S; Huang J; Wang X; Ma X
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2020; 28(3):2309499020966125. PubMed ID: 33155519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of implant orientation and implant material on tibia bone strain, implant-bone micromotion, contact pressure, and wear depth due to total ankle replacement.
    Mondal S; Ghosh R
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2019 Mar; 233(3):318-331. PubMed ID: 30663509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating Component Migration: Comparing Two Generations of the INBONE(®) Total Ankle Replacement.
    Brigido SA; Wobst GM; Galli MM; Protzman NM
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2015; 54(5):892-5. PubMed ID: 26033824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical analysis of three popular tibial designs for TAR with different implant-bone interfacial conditions and bone qualities: A finite element study.
    Jyoti ; Mondal S; Ghosh R
    Med Eng Phys; 2022 Jun; 104():103812. PubMed ID: 35641078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can a Three-Component Prosthesis be Used for Conversion of Painful Ankle Arthrodesis to Total Ankle Replacement?
    Preis M; Bailey T; Marchand LS; Barg A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Sep; 475(9):2283-2294. PubMed ID: 28425054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Polka dot cementless talar component in enhancing total ankle replacement fixation: A parametric study using the finite element analysis approach.
    Mohd Moideen IS; Lim CT; Yeow RCH; Chong DYR
    Comput Biol Med; 2022 Feb; 141():105142. PubMed ID: 34963085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of the depth of resection of the distal tibia on biomechanical performance of the tibial component for TAR: A finite element analysis with three implant designs.
    Jyoti ; Ghosh R
    Med Eng Phys; 2023 Sep; 119():104034. PubMed ID: 37634911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A combined FE-hybrid MCDM framework for improving the performance of the conical stem tibial design for TAR with the addition of pegs.
    Jyoti ; Ghosh R
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Jul; 237():107574. PubMed ID: 37148636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variable Volumes of Resected Bone Resulting From Different Total Ankle Arthroplasty Systems.
    Goetz JE; Rungprai C; Tennant JN; Huber E; Uribe B; Femino J; Phisitkul P; Amendola A
    Foot Ankle Int; 2016 Aug; 37(8):898-904. PubMed ID: 27113607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Axial Rotational Alignment in Mobile-Bearing Total Ankle Arthroplasty.
    Hintermann B; Susdorf R; Krähenbühl N; Ruiz R
    Foot Ankle Int; 2020 May; 41(5):521-528. PubMed ID: 31996033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical evaluation of total ankle arthroplasty. Part II: Influence of loading and fixation design on tibial bone-implant interaction.
    Quevedo González FJ; Steineman BD; Sturnick DR; Deland JT; Demetracopoulos CA; Wright TM
    J Orthop Res; 2021 Jan; 39(1):103-111. PubMed ID: 33030768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Printable functionally graded tibial implant for TAR: FE study comparing implant materials, FGM properties, and implant designs.
    Jyoti ; Ghosh R
    Comput Biol Med; 2024 Jul; 177():108645. PubMed ID: 38796883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.