151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35047160)
1. Multimodal Imaging of Target Detection Algorithm under Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Early Breast Cancer.
Jiang M; Lei S; Zhang J; Hou L; Zhang M; Luo Y
J Healthc Eng; 2022; 2022():9322937. PubMed ID: 35047160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multimodal MRI Analysis of Cervical Cancer on the Basis of Artificial Intelligence Algorithm.
Wang B; Zhang Y; Wu C; Wang F
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2021; 2021():1673490. PubMed ID: 34858113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Value of Mammography in the Evaluation of Palpable Breast Lumps in Women 30 Years Old and Older.
Brown AL; Phillips J; Slanetz PJ; Fein-Zachary V; Venkataraman S; Dialani V; Mehta TS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Oct; 209(4):935-942. PubMed ID: 28777649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multimodal Imaging under Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for the Diagnosis of Liver Cancer and Its Relationship with Expressions of EZH2 and p57.
Zhang Y; Cui J; Wan W; Liu J
Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():4081654. PubMed ID: 35321452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Virtual Biopsy by Using Artificial Intelligence-based Multimodal Modeling of Binational Mammography Data.
Barros V; Tlusty T; Barkan E; Hexter E; Gruen D; Guindy M; Rosen-Zvi M
Radiology; 2023 Mar; 306(3):e220027. PubMed ID: 36283109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective Analysis Using a Novel CNN Algorithm to Distinguish Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia From Ductal Carcinoma in Situ in Breast.
Mutasa S; Chang P; Nemer J; Van Sant EP; Sun M; McIlvride A; Siddique M; Ha R
Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Dec; 20(6):e757-e760. PubMed ID: 32680766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Distinction between benign and malignant breast masses at breast ultrasound using deep learning method with convolutional neural network.
Fujioka T; Kubota K; Mori M; Kikuchi Y; Katsuta L; Kasahara M; Oda G; Ishiba T; Nakagawa T; Tateishi U
Jpn J Radiol; 2019 Jun; 37(6):466-472. PubMed ID: 30888570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Utilization of Ultrasonic Image Characteristics Combined with Endoscopic Detection on the Basis of Artificial Intelligence Algorithm in Diagnosis of Early Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer.
Wang L; Song H; Wang M; Wang H; Ge R; Shen Y; Yu Y
J Healthc Eng; 2021; 2021():2773022. PubMed ID: 34880973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Interventional Therapy on Iliac Venous Compression Syndrome Evaluated and Diagnosed by Artificial Intelligence Algorithm-Based Ultrasound Images.
Bai Y; Bo F; Ma W; Xu H; Liu D
J Healthc Eng; 2021; 2021():5755671. PubMed ID: 34336159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Convolutional neural network for discriminating nasopharyngeal carcinoma and benign hyperplasia on MRI.
Wong LM; King AD; Ai QYH; Lam WKJ; Poon DMC; Ma BBY; Chan KCA; Mo FKF
Eur Radiol; 2021 Jun; 31(6):3856-3863. PubMed ID: 33241522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utility and Outcomes of Imaging Evaluation for Palpable Lumps in the Postmastectomy Patient.
Dashevsky BZ; Hayward JH; Woodard GA; Joe BN; Lee AY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Aug; 213(2):464-472. PubMed ID: 31039027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Detecting breast cancer using artificial intelligence: Convolutional neural network.
Choudhury A; Perumalla S
Technol Health Care; 2021; 29(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 32444590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnosis of Early Cervical Cancer with a Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Image under the Artificial Intelligence Algorithm.
Zhang Z; Zhang C; Xiao L; Zhang S
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2022; 2022():6495309. PubMed ID: 35386728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The accuracy of breast ultrasound in the evaluation of clinically benign discrete, symptomatic breast lumps.
Lister D; Evans AJ; Burrell HC; Blamey RW; Wilson AR; Pinder SE; Ellis IO; Elston CW; Kollias J
Clin Radiol; 1998 Jul; 53(7):490-2. PubMed ID: 9714387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Artificial intelligence for breast cancer analysis: Trends & directions.
Shah SM; Khan RA; Arif S; Sajid U
Comput Biol Med; 2022 Mar; 142():105221. PubMed ID: 35016100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Value of shear wave elastrography image classification in the diagnosis of breast masses].
Li TT; Kang CS; Li HZ; Xue JP; Yang QM; Lyu J
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 41(7):540-545. PubMed ID: 31357843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Retrospective and comparative analysis of (99m)Tc-Sestamibi breast specific gamma imaging versus mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in Chinese women.
Yu X; Hu G; Zhang Z; Qiu F; Shao X; Wang X; Zhan H; Chen Y; Deng Y; Huang J
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():450. PubMed ID: 27401536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating the usefulness of breast strain elastography for intraductal lesions.
Kokubu Y; Yamada K; Tanabe M; Izumori A; Kato C; Horii R; Ohno S; Matsueda K
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2021 Jan; 48(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 33389371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deep Learning in Mammography: Diagnostic Accuracy of a Multipurpose Image Analysis Software in the Detection of Breast Cancer.
Becker AS; Marcon M; Ghafoor S; Wurnig MC; Frauenfelder T; Boss A
Invest Radiol; 2017 Jul; 52(7):434-440. PubMed ID: 28212138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictive value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of palpable breast lump.
Pande AR; Lohani B; Sayami P; Pradhan S
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2003; 1(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 16388202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
