These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35047346)

  • 1. Is underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of colon polyps superior to conventional techniques? A network analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection and submucosal dissection.
    Tan DJH; Ng CH; Lim XC; Lim WH; Yuen LZH; Koh JH; Nistala KRY; Ho KY; Chong CS; Muthiah MD
    Endosc Int Open; 2022 Jan; 10(1):E154-E162. PubMed ID: 35047346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Underwater
    Ni DQ; Lu YP; Liu XQ; Gao LY; Huang X
    World J Clin Cases; 2020 Oct; 8(20):4826-4837. PubMed ID: 33195650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Lim XC; Nistala KRY; Ng CH; Lin SY; Tan DJH; Ho KY; Chong CS; Muthiah M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2021 Jul; 27(25):3925-3939. PubMed ID: 34321855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for 20-30 mm colorectal polyps.
    Inoue T; Nakagawa K; Yamasaki Y; Shichijo S; Kanesaka T; Maekawa A; Higashino K; Uedo N; Ishihara R; Takeuchi Y
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 36(9):2549-2557. PubMed ID: 33724540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps.
    Schenck RJ; Jahann DA; Patrie JT; Stelow EB; Cox DG; Uppal DS; Sauer BG; Shami VM; Strand DS; Wang AY
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4174-4183. PubMed ID: 28342125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feasibility and outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥ 10 mm colorectal polyps.
    Siau K; Ishaq S; Cadoni S; Kuwai T; Yusuf A; Suzuki N
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jun; 32(6):2656-2663. PubMed ID: 29101560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcomes for Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of 21-30-mm Colorectal Polyps: A Feasible Study.
    Okimoto K; Matsumura T; Matsusaka K; Inaba Y; Ishikawa T; Akizue N; Kaneko T; Ota M; Ohta Y; Taida T; Saito K; Ogasawara S; Maruoka D; Kato J; Ikeda JI; Kato N
    Dig Dis Sci; 2023 Oct; 68(10):3963-3973. PubMed ID: 37658209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of underwater and conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for removing sessile colorectal polyps: a propensity-score matched cohort study.
    Chien HC; Uedo N; Hsieh PH
    Endosc Int Open; 2019 Nov; 7(11):E1528-E1536. PubMed ID: 31681832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sundaram S; Seth V; Jearth V; Giri S
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2023 May; 115(5):225-233. PubMed ID: 36148677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes of Gastrointestinal Polyps Resected Using Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (UEMR) Compared to Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (CEMR).
    Mouchli MA; Reddy S; Walsh C; Mir A; Bierle L; Chitnavis V; Yeaton P; Shakhatreh M
    Cureus; 2020 Nov; 12(11):e11485. PubMed ID: 33329981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feasibility study comparing underwater endoscopic mucosal resection and conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumor < 20 mm.
    Kiguchi Y; Kato M; Nakayama A; Sasaki M; Mizutani M; Tsutsumi K; Akimoto T; Takatori Y; Mutaguchi M; Takabayashi K; Ochiai Y; Maehata T; Kanai T; Yahagi N
    Dig Endosc; 2020 Jul; 32(5):753-760. PubMed ID: 31498932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multicenter evaluation of recurrence in endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection in the colon: A Western perspective.
    Wei MT; Zhou MJ; Li AA; Ofosu A; Hwang JH; Friedland S
    World J Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 Jun; 15(6):458-468. PubMed ID: 37397977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10 mm or Larger Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Garg R; Singh A; Aggarwal M; Bhalla J; Mohan BP; Burke C; Rustagi T; Chahal P
    Clin Endosc; 2021 May; 54(3):379-389. PubMed ID: 33910271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Garg R; Singh A; Mohan BP; Mankaney G; Regueiro M; Chahal P
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Dec; 8(12):E1884-E1894. PubMed ID: 33269325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Underwater vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Intermediate-Size Colorectal Polyps.
    Yamashina T; Uedo N; Akasaka T; Iwatsubo T; Nakatani Y; Akamatsu T; Kawamura T; Takeuchi Y; Fujii S; Kusaka T; Shimokawa T
    Gastroenterology; 2019 Aug; 157(2):451-461.e2. PubMed ID: 30981791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Underwater vs conventional endoscopic mucosal resection in the management of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kamal F; Khan MA; Lee-Smith W; Khan Z; Sharma S; Tombazzi C; Ahmad D; Ismail MK; Howden CW; Binmoeller KF
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Oct; 8(10):E1264-E1272. PubMed ID: 33015327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Underwater versus conventional EMR for colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Choi AY; Moosvi Z; Shah S; Roccato MK; Wang AY; Hamerski CM; Samarasena JB
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Feb; 93(2):378-389. PubMed ID: 33068608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Safety and efficacy of underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
    Chandan S; Bapaye J; Khan SR; Mohan BP; Ramai D; Dahiya DS; Bilal M; Draganov PV; Othman MO; Rodriguez Sánchez J; Kochhar GS
    Endosc Int Open; 2023 Aug; 11(8):E768-E777. PubMed ID: 37593155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for patients with early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Tao M; Zhou X; Hu M; Pan J
    BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e025803. PubMed ID: 31874864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial esophageal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Han C; Sun Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2021 Apr; 34(4):. PubMed ID: 32895709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.