205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35047636)
1. Retrospective Analysis of Cervical Cancer Treatment Outcomes: Ten Years of Experience with the Vaginal Assisted Radical Laparoscopic Hysterectomy VARLH.
Wojdat R; Malanowska E
Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():5163886. PubMed ID: 35047636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.
Kohler C; Hertel H; Herrmann J; Marnitz S; Mallmann P; Favero G; Plaikner A; Martus P; Gajda M; Schneider A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):845-850. PubMed ID: 31155516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB: description of the technique, our experience and results after the era of LACC trial.
Kavallaris A; Chalvatzas N; Gkoutzioulis A; Zygouris D
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Apr; 303(4):1039-1047. PubMed ID: 33068159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter analysis.
Rodriguez J; Rauh-Hain JA; Saenz J; Isla DO; Rendon Pereira GJ; Odetto D; Martinelli F; Villoslada V; Zapardiel I; Trujillo LM; Perez M; Hernandez M; Saadi JM; Raspagliesi F; Valdivia H; Siegrist J; Fu S; Hernandez Nava M; Echeverry L; Noll F; Ditto A; Lopez A; Hernandez A; Pareja R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Apr; 31(4):504-511. PubMed ID: 33504547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of modified radical laparoscopic hysterectomy versus open radical hysterectomy on short-term clinical outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer: a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Lv X; Ding B; Xu J; Shen Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 21(1):167. PubMed ID: 37270549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term oncological outcomes of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A retrospective, single-institutional study in the wake of the LACC trial.
Kanno K; Andou M; Yanai S; Toeda M; Nimura R; Ichikawa F; Teishikata Y; Shirane T; Sakate S; Kihira T; Hamasaki Y; Sawada M; Shirane A; Ota Y
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2425-2434. PubMed ID: 31502349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radical vaginal hysterectomy with extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer.
Savino L; Borruto F; Comparetto C; Massi GB
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2001; 22(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 11321490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transvaginal cervical tumor-concealing no-look no-touch technique in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a novel operation technique.
Kanao H; Fusegi A; Omi M; Youssefzadeh AC; Nomura H; Matsuo K
J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 May; 34(3):e27. PubMed ID: 36562133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).
Odetto D; Puga MC; Saadi J; Noll F; Perrotta M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):863-868. PubMed ID: 31155517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study of tumor
Zhao J; Liu Q; Jiang D; Chen T; Meng S; Shu C
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Nov; 48(11):1686-1695. PubMed ID: 38432859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (VALRH) versus laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH) in the treatment of cervical cancer: surgical results and oncologic outcome.
Lanowska M; Brink-Spalink V; Mangler M; Grittner U; von Tucher E; Schneider A; Köhler C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 289(6):1293-300. PubMed ID: 24362556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Choi CH; Lee JW; Lee YY; Kim HJ; Song T; Kim MK; Kim TJ; Kim BG; Bae DS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Nov; 19(12):3839-48. PubMed ID: 22644508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A multicenter non-inferior randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (stages IB1, IB2, and IIA1): study protocol of the LAUNCH 2 trial.
Wu X; Qiu L; Lou W; Wang X; Zhu T; Zhang Y; Hu W; Xue X; Zhu Z; Xiang L; Li J; Fang X; Gao S; Feng H; Diao W; Zhang H; Du M; Bai Y; Hou Y; Yan W; Feng H; Yu H; Zhu S; Du Y; Jiang H
Trials; 2022 Apr; 23(1):269. PubMed ID: 35395868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes.
Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Loverro M; Pirovano C; Fachechi G; Corso S; Trojano G
Acta Biomed; 2017 Oct; 88(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 29083333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of survival and adverse events between women with stage IB1 and stage IB2 cervical cancer treated by laparoscopic radical vaginal hysterectomy.
Hong JH; Choi JS; Lee JH; Son CE; Jeon SW; Bae JW; Eom JM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Feb; 19(2):605-11. PubMed ID: 21769469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of survival outcome of open, total laparoscopic, and laparoscopy-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy for stage IB2 cervical cancer patients: A multicenter retrospective study.
Yoon HJ; Kwon BS; Rho HJ; Lee TH; Jeong DH; Kim KH; Suh DS; Song YJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Mar; 103(10):e37426. PubMed ID: 38457577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oncologic results and surgical morbidity of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: long-term follow-up.
Park NY; Chong GO; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS; Lee YS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Feb; 21(2):355-62. PubMed ID: 21270616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
