133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35048167)
21. Outcomes of Transvaginal High Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension: Over 500-Patient Single-Center Study.
Milani R; Frigerio M; Cola A; Beretta C; Spelzini F; Manodoro S
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(3):203-206. PubMed ID: 29697546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Subjective and Objective Outcomes of Robotic and Vaginal High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
Vallabh-Patel V; Saiz C; Salamon C
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(6):420-424. PubMed ID: 27465813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ligament shortening compared to vaginal colpopexy at the time of hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Fairchild PS; Kamdar NS; Rosen ER; Swenson CW; Fenner DE; DeLancey JO; Morgan DM
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jun; 28(6):899-905. PubMed ID: 27858132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Techniques for Apical Prolapse Management in Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
Liu J; Lin Q; Zhou X; Wu C; Guan Z; Guan X
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 28(6):1144-1145. PubMed ID: 33130226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Technique of extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension for apical suspension.
Ow LL; Walsh CE; Rajamaheswari N; Dwyer PL
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Apr; 27(4):637-9. PubMed ID: 26612207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vermeulen CKM; Schuurman B; Coolen AWM; Meijs-Hermanns PR; van Leijsen SAL; Veen J; Bongers MY
BJOG; 2023 Dec; 130(13):1568-1578. PubMed ID: 37271736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Native Tissue Prolapse Repairs: Comparative Effectiveness Trials.
Siff LN; Barber MD
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2016 Mar; 43(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 26880509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF
BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Surgical cure of chronic pelvic pain in the female by uterosacral ligament repair.
Petros PEP
Neurourol Urodyn; 2023 Nov; 42(8):1849-1852. PubMed ID: 37395466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Vaginal Colposuspension Using the Uphold Lite Mesh System versus Transvaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Treatment of Apical Prolapse: A Comparative Study.
Chill HH; Navon I; Reuveni-Salzman A; Cohen A; Dick A; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 28(10):1759-1764. PubMed ID: 33713835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Extraperitoneal high vaginal cuff suspension at the time of vaginal hysterectomy for advanced uterovaginal prolapse: Results of a modified McCall technique from a longitudinal clinical study.
Zilberlicht A; Dwyer PL; Karmakar D; Carswell F; Schierlitz L
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Apr; 61(2):258-262. PubMed ID: 33346932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The K-Technique: A Novel Technique for Laparoscopic Apical Suspension Using Barbed Sutures.
Khalife T; Hanna RK
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(2):157-161. PubMed ID: 28118169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Recurrent apical prolapse after high uterosacral ligament suspension - in a heterogenous cohort characterised by a high prevalence of previous pelvic operations.
Pedersen KD; Storkholm MH; Bek KM; Glavind-Kristensen M; Greisen S
BMC Womens Health; 2019 Jul; 19(1):96. PubMed ID: 31299946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect].
Zhang YH; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Shen WJ; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 54(7):445-451. PubMed ID: 31365956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Neural entrapment during uterosacral ligament suspension: an anatomic study of female cadavers.
Siddiqui NY; Mitchell TRT; Bentley RC; Weidner AC
Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 116(3):708-713. PubMed ID: 20733456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Infected pelvic hematoma following vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension for treatment of apical prolapse.
Chill HH; Ben Porat L; Winer J; Moss NP; Cohen A; Shveiky D
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Apr; 271():97-101. PubMed ID: 35180514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Tips and tricks for uterosacral ligament suspension: how to avoid ureteral injury.
Manodoro S; Frigerio M; Milani R; Spelzini F
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jan; 29(1):161-163. PubMed ID: 29038833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension by using the cervix as a traction device.
Pal M; Bandyopadhyay S
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Aug; 31(8):1701. PubMed ID: 32034457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Demonstration of a box-stitch technique for laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension.
Wyman AM; Hahn L; Mikhail E; Hart S
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1841-1842. PubMed ID: 28451705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Suture Complication Rates and Surgical Outcomes According to the Nonabsorbable Suture Materials Used in Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: Polyester versus Polypropylene.
Lee J; Oh S; Jeon MJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 28(8):1503-1507. PubMed ID: 33310165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
