139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35049092)
1. Effect of storage temperature and flash-freezing on salivary microbiota profiles based on 16S rRNA-targeted sequencing.
Furuhashi H; Takayasu L; Isshi K; Hara Y; Ono S; Kato M; Sumiyama K; Suda W
Eur J Oral Sci; 2022 Apr; 130(2):e12852. PubMed ID: 35049092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the impact of different fecal storage protocols on the microbiota diversity and composition: a pilot study.
Moossavi S; Engen PA; Ghanbari R; Green SJ; Naqib A; Bishehsari F; Merat S; Poustchi H; Keshavarzian A; Malekzadeh R
BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):145. PubMed ID: 31253096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimisation of 16S rRNA gut microbiota profiling of extremely low birth weight infants.
Alcon-Giner C; Caim S; Mitra S; Ketskemety J; Wegmann U; Wain J; Belteki G; Clarke P; Hall LJ
BMC Genomics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):841. PubMed ID: 29096601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An ambient-temperature storage and stabilization device performs comparably to flash-frozen collection for stool metabolomics in infants.
Ramamoorthy S; Levy S; Mohamed M; Abdelghani A; Evans AM; Miller LAD; Mehta L; Moore S; Freinkman E; Hourigan SK
BMC Microbiol; 2021 Feb; 21(1):59. PubMed ID: 33618670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of stool versus rectal swab samples and storage conditions on bacterial community profiles.
Bassis CM; Moore NM; Lolans K; Seekatz AM; Weinstein RA; Young VB; Hayden MK;
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):78. PubMed ID: 28359329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Collection of non-meconium stool on fecal occult blood cards is an effective method for fecal microbiota studies in infants.
Wong WSW; Clemency N; Klein E; Provenzano M; Iyer R; Niederhuber JE; Hourigan SK
Microbiome; 2017 Sep; 5(1):114. PubMed ID: 28870234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Analysis of the dynamic changes in gut microbiota in patients with extremely severe burns by 16S ribosomal RNA high-throughput sequencing technology].
Pan YY; Fan YF; Li JL; Cui SY; Huang N; Jin GY; Chen C; Zhang C
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2020 Dec; 36(12):1159-1166. PubMed ID: 33379852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of room temperature transport vials on DNA quality and phylogenetic composition of faecal microbiota of elderly adults and infants.
Hill CJ; Brown JR; Lynch DB; Jeffery IB; Ryan CA; Ross RP; Stanton C; O'Toole PW
Microbiome; 2016 May; 4(1):19. PubMed ID: 27160322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Variations of gut microbiome composition under different preservation solutions and periods].
Duan Y; Lü N; Cai F; Zhu B
Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2020 Dec; 36(12):2525-2540. PubMed ID: 33398951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interpersonal Variations in Gut Microbiota Profiles Supersedes the Effects of Differing Fecal Storage Conditions.
Bundgaard-Nielsen C; Hagstrøm S; Sørensen S
Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):17367. PubMed ID: 30478355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles.
Choo JM; Leong LE; Rogers GB
Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16350. PubMed ID: 26572876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An alternative storage method for characterization of the intestinal microbiota through next generation sequencing.
Ribeiro RM; Souza-Basqueira M; Oliveira LC; Salles FC; Pereira NB; Sabino EC
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo; 2018 Nov; 60():e77. PubMed ID: 30517247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of DNA extraction methodology on gut microbiota research applications.
Gerasimidis K; Bertz M; Quince C; Brunner K; Bruce A; Combet E; Calus S; Loman N; Ijaz UZ
BMC Res Notes; 2016 Jul; 9():365. PubMed ID: 27456340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of DNA stabilizers and storage conditions on preserving fecal microbiota profiles.
Chen CC; Wu WK; Chang CM; Panyod S; Lu TP; Liou JM; Fang YJ; Chuang EY; Wu MS
J Formos Med Assoc; 2020 Dec; 119(12):1791-1798. PubMed ID: 32111519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Collection media and delayed freezing effects on microbial composition of human stool.
Flores R; Shi J; Yu G; Ma B; Ravel J; Goedert JJ; Sinha R
Microbiome; 2015; 3():33. PubMed ID: 26269741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of sampling and storage procedures on preserving the community structure of stool microbiota: A simple at-home toilet-paper collection method.
Al KF; Bisanz JE; Gloor GB; Reid G; Burton JP
J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Jan; 144():117-121. PubMed ID: 29155236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Different next generation sequencing platforms produce different microbial profiles and diversity in cystic fibrosis sputum.
Hahn A; Sanyal A; Perez GF; Colberg-Poley AM; Campos J; Rose MC; Pérez-Losada M
J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Nov; 130():95-99. PubMed ID: 27609714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in Microbiota Profiles After Prolonged Frozen Storage of Stool Suspensions.
Dorsaz S; Charretier Y; Girard M; Gaïa N; Leo S; Schrenzel J; Harbarth S; Huttner B; Lazarevic V
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2020; 10():77. PubMed ID: 32185143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of freezing on faecal microbiota as determined using MiSeq sequencing and culture-based investigations.
Fouhy F; Deane J; Rea MC; O'Sullivan Ó; Ross RP; O'Callaghan G; Plant BJ; Stanton C
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119355. PubMed ID: 25748176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Taxonomic annotation of 16S rRNA sequences of pig intestinal samples using MG-RAST and QIIME2 generated different microbiota compositions.
Lima J; Manning T; Rutherford KM; Baima ET; Dewhurst RJ; Walsh P; Roehe R
J Microbiol Methods; 2021 Jul; 186():106235. PubMed ID: 33974954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
