These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35049166)

  • 1. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography on the detection of cesarean scar pregnancy: A meta-analysis.
    Xiao X; Ding R; Peng L; Liu H; Zhu Y
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Dec; 100(48):e27532. PubMed ID: 35049166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Diagnostic value of 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging for early cesarean scar pregnancy].
    Liu Q; Zhang R; Wang X; Liu K; Bai G; Huang Y; Zhu H; Yan Z
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 94(45):3589-92. PubMed ID: 25622841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with ultrasound in evaluation of cesarean scar pregnancy.
    Huang Q; Zhang M; Zhai RY
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1890-3. PubMed ID: 25056467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy and cut-off of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in caesarean scar pregnancy.
    Li H; Liu X; Xie L; Ye Z; Gan L
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Mar; 246():117-122. PubMed ID: 32007793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic value of transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound combined with color Doppler ultrasound for early cesarean scar pregnancy.
    Shi L; Huang L; Liu L; Yang X; Yao D; Chen D; Xiong J; Duan J
    Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Oct; 10(10):10486-10494. PubMed ID: 34763495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differential Diagnostic Value of Two-dimensional Ultrasound Combined with Three-dimensional Ultrasound Imaging Technology for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.
    Feng C; You L; Zhu X
    Curr Med Imaging; 2024; 20():1-6. PubMed ID: 38389350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MRI versus CT for the detection of pulmonary nodules: A meta-analysis.
    Liu H; Chen R; Tong C; Liang XW
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Oct; 100(42):e27270. PubMed ID: 34678861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.
    Liu D; Yang M; Wu Q
    Clin Chim Acta; 2018 Nov; 486():291-297. PubMed ID: 30102898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose cesarean scar pregnancies.
    Huang Q; Zhang M; Zhai RY
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Nov; 127(2):144-6. PubMed ID: 25035091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of cesarean scar pregnancy type.
    Wu Y; Zhou L; Chen L; Zhou Q; Zeng T
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Nov; 98(44):e17741. PubMed ID: 31689823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Diagnostic Efficacy among Transvaginal Sonography, Transabdominal Sonography, and 3.0 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Early Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.
    Wang K; Jing F
    J Healthc Eng; 2022; 2022():9714369. PubMed ID: 35126959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcome of Cesarean scar pregnancy managed expectantly: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Calì G; Timor-Tritsch IE; Palacios-Jaraquemada J; Monteaugudo A; Buca D; Forlani F; Familiari A; Scambia G; Acharya G; D'Antonio F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 51(2):169-175. PubMed ID: 28661021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance enterography and ultrasound in children with inflammatory bowel diseases: a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.
    He L; Sun Y; Hu X; Yao Q
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):1330-1341. PubMed ID: 34331116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic value of FDG-PET versus magnetic resonance imaging for detecting spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yin Y; Liu X; Yang X; Guo J; Wang Q; Chen L
    Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2323-2332. PubMed ID: 30121323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of cases with cesarean scar pregnancy.
    Zhang Y; Gu Y; Wang JM; Li Y
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Jan; 39(1):195-202. PubMed ID: 22640013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overall diagnostic accuracy of different MR imaging sequences for detection of dysplastic nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Xiong J; Luo J; Bian J; Wu J
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):1285-1296. PubMed ID: 34357448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel method for typing of cesarean scar pregnancy based on size of cesarean scar diverticulum and its significance in clinical decision-making.
    Du Q; Liu G; Zhao W
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 May; 46(5):707-714. PubMed ID: 32153107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Easy sonographic differential diagnosis between intrauterine pregnancy and cesarean delivery scar pregnancy in the early first trimester.
    Timor-Tritsch IE; Monteagudo A; Cali G; El Refaey H; Kaelin Agten A; Arslan AA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 215(2):225.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26899908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography vs. magnetic resonance-hysterosalpingography for diagnosing fallopian tubal patency: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chen LS; Zhu ZQ; Li J; Wang ZT; Qiang Y; Hu XY; Zhang MM; Wang ZQ
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Apr; 125():108891. PubMed ID: 32088657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Staging/restaging performance of F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: A review and meta-analysis.
    Lin CY; Lin CL; Kao CH
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():158-165. PubMed ID: 30292261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.