197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35049312)
21. Statistical Analysis on the Performance of Molecular Mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area versus Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations: Bromodomains as a Case Study.
Aldeghi M; Bodkin MJ; Knapp S; Biggin PC
J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Sep; 57(9):2203-2221. PubMed ID: 28786670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Molecular recognition in a diverse set of protein-ligand interactions studied with molecular dynamics simulations and end-point free energy calculations.
Wang B; Li L; Hurley TD; Meroueh SO
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Oct; 53(10):2659-70. PubMed ID: 24032517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Case-specific performance of MM-PBSA, MM-GBSA, and SIE in virtual screening.
Virtanen SI; Niinivehmas SP; Pentikäinen OT
J Mol Graph Model; 2015 Nov; 62():303-318. PubMed ID: 26550792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment.
Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of atomic charge, solvation, entropy, and ligand protonation state on MM-PB(GB)SA binding energies of HIV protease.
Oehme DP; Brownlee RT; Wilson DJ
J Comput Chem; 2012 Dec; 33(32):2566-80. PubMed ID: 22915442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In silico binding profile characterization of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and its mutants bound to human ACE2 receptor.
Zhang Y; He X; Zhai J; Ji B; Man VH; Wang J
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Nov; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 34013346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Binding-affinity predictions of HSP90 in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 with docking, MM/GBSA, QM/MM, and free-energy simulations.
Misini Ignjatović M; Caldararu O; Dong G; Muñoz-Gutierrez C; Adasme-Carreño F; Ryde U
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):707-730. PubMed ID: 27565797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison between computational alanine scanning and per-residue binding free energy decomposition for protein-protein association using MM-GBSA: application to the TCR-p-MHC complex.
Zoete V; Michielin O
Proteins; 2007 Jun; 67(4):1026-47. PubMed ID: 17377991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prioritizing Small Sets of Molecules for Synthesis through in-silico Tools: A Comparison of Common Ranking Methods.
Breznik M; Ge Y; Bluck JP; Briem H; Hahn DF; Christ CD; Mortier J; Mobley DL; Meier K
ChemMedChem; 2023 Jan; 18(1):e202200425. PubMed ID: 36240514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The normal-mode entropy in the MM/GBSA method: effect of system truncation, buffer region, and dielectric constant.
Genheden S; Kuhn O; Mikulskis P; Hoffmann D; Ryde U
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Aug; 52(8):2079-88. PubMed ID: 22817270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. VAD-MM/GBSA: A Variable Atomic Dielectric MM/GBSA Model for Improved Accuracy in Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations.
Wang E; Fu W; Jiang D; Sun H; Wang J; Zhang X; Weng G; Liu H; Tao P; Hou T
J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Jun; 61(6):2844-2856. PubMed ID: 34014672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Integrating Ligand and Target-Driven Based Virtual Screening Approaches With
Tutumlu G; Dogan B; Avsar T; Orhan MD; Calis S; Durdagi S
Front Chem; 2020; 8():167. PubMed ID: 32328476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 10. Impacts of enhanced sampling and variable dielectric model on protein-protein Interactions.
Wang E; Weng G; Sun H; Du H; Zhu F; Chen F; Wang Z; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2019 Sep; 21(35):18958-18969. PubMed ID: 31453590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. PLAS-5k: Dataset of Protein-Ligand Affinities from Molecular Dynamics for Machine Learning Applications.
Korlepara DB; Vasavi CS; Jeurkar S; Pal PK; Roy S; Mehta S; Sharma S; Kumar V; Muvva C; Sridharan B; Garg A; Modee R; Bhati AP; Nayar D; Priyakumar UD
Sci Data; 2022 Sep; 9(1):548. PubMed ID: 36071074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Atomistic models for free energy evaluation of drug binding to membrane proteins.
Durdagi S; Zhao C; Cuervo JE; Noskov SY
Curr Med Chem; 2011; 18(17):2601-11. PubMed ID: 21568889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Using molecular dynamics simulations to evaluate active designs of cephradine hydrolase by molecular mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann surface area and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area methods.
Xue J; Huang X; Zhu Y
RSC Adv; 2019 Apr; 9(24):13868-13877. PubMed ID: 35519543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Will molecular dynamics simulations of proteins ever reach equilibrium?
Genheden S; Ryde U
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2012 Jun; 14(24):8662-77. PubMed ID: 22614001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Molecular Rules Underpinning Enhanced Affinity Binding of Human T Cell Receptors Engineered for Immunotherapy.
Crean RM; MacLachlan BJ; Madura F; Whalley T; Rizkallah PJ; Holland CJ; McMurran C; Harper S; Godkin A; Sewell AK; Pudney CR; van der Kamp MW; Cole DK
Mol Ther Oncolytics; 2020 Sep; 18():443-456. PubMed ID: 32913893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Improving virtual screening results with MM/GBSA and MM/PBSA rescoring.
Sahakyan H
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jun; 35(6):731-736. PubMed ID: 33983518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Binding free energy calculations using MMPB/GBSA approaches for PAMAM-G4-drug complexes at neutral, basic and acid pH conditions.
Martínez-Muñoz A; Bello M; Romero-Castro A; Rodríguez-Fonseca RA; Rodrigues J; Sánchez-Espinosa VA; Correa-Basurto J
J Mol Graph Model; 2017 Sep; 76():330-341. PubMed ID: 28759825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
