193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35049610)
1. Influence of Framework Material and Posterior Implant Angulation in Full-Arch All-on-4 Implant-Supported Prosthesis Stress Concentration.
Tribst JPM; Campanelli de Morais D; Melo de Matos JD; Lopes GDRS; Dal Piva AMO; Souto Borges AL; Bottino MA; Lanzotti A; Martorelli M; Ausiello P
Dent J (Basel); 2022 Jan; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 35049610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanical response of different frameworks for maxillary all-on-four implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: 3D finite element analysis.
Güçlü ZB; Gürbüz A; Deste Gökay G; Durkan R; Oyar P
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2022 Oct; 67(5):419-428. PubMed ID: 35972416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical Response of PEKK and PEEK As Frameworks for Implant-Supported Full-Arch Fixed Dental Prosthesis: 3D Finite Element Analysis.
Villefort RF; Diamantino PJS; Zeidler SLVV; Borges ALS; Silva-Concílio LR; Saavedra GDFA; Tribst JPM
Eur J Dent; 2022 Feb; 16(1):115-121. PubMed ID: 34560810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different framework materials in implant-supported fixed mandibular prosthesis].
Yu WQ; Li XQ; Chen SY; Ma XN; Xu X
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Feb; 56(2):190-195. PubMed ID: 33557504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of Cantilever Length and Implant Inclination on the Stress Distribution of Mandibular Prosthetic Restorations Constructed from Monolithic Zirconia Ceramic.
Durkan R; Oyar P; Deste G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(1):121-129. PubMed ID: 31923295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of the design of a mandibular implant-supported zirconia prosthesis on stress distribution.
Oyar P; Durkan R; Deste G
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):502.e1-502.e11. PubMed ID: 32893017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A finite element analysis to study the stress distribution on distal implants in an all-on-four situation in atrophic maxilla as affected by the tilt of the implants and varying cantilever lengths.
Kumari A; Malhotra P; Phogat S; Yadav B; Yadav J; Phukela SS
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2020; 20(4):409-416. PubMed ID: 33487969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible--a computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Barão VA; Delben JA; Lima J; Cabral T; Assunção WG
J Biomech; 2013 Apr; 46(7):1312-20. PubMed ID: 23518207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical investigation of maxillary implant-supported full-arch prostheses produced with different framework materials: a finite elements study.
Topcu Ersöz MB; Mumcu E
J Adv Prosthodont; 2022 Dec; 14(6):346-359. PubMed ID: 36685790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between all-on-four and all-on-six treatment concepts and framework material on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: A prototyping guided 3D-FEA study.
Bhering CL; Mesquita MF; Kemmoku DT; Noritomi PY; Consani RL; Barão VA
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 Dec; 69():715-25. PubMed ID: 27612765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of superstructure material on the stress distribution in mandibular full-arch implant-supported fixed dentures. A CT-based 3D-FEA.
Ferreira MB; Barão VA; Faverani LP; Hipólito AC; Assunção WG
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2014 Feb; 35():92-9. PubMed ID: 24411356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Finite element analysis of implant-supported prosthesis with pontic and cantilever in the posterior maxilla.
de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DA; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CA; Pellizzer EP
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 May; 20(6):663-670. PubMed ID: 28349769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Influence of Custom-Milled Framework Design for an Implant-Supported Full-Arch Fixed Dental Prosthesis: 3D-FEA Sudy.
Tribst JPM; Dal Piva AMO; Lo Giudice R; Borges ALS; Bottino MA; Epifania E; Ausiello P
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jun; 17(11):. PubMed ID: 32517097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical Stress Analysis of Different Configurations of the All-on-4 Concept in Atrophic Mandible: A 3D Finite Element Study.
Santana LCL; Guastaldi FPS; Idogava HT; Noritomi PY; De Foggi CC; Vaz LG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 33600526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of the location and diameter of implants on the stress distribution in three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures under dynamic loads].
Lü J; Liu C; Lan J; Gao X
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 31(6):552-6. PubMed ID: 24437284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Comparative Analysis on Two Types of Oral Implants, Bone-Level and Tissue-Level, with Different Cantilever Lengths of Fixed Prosthesis.
Mosavar A; Nili M; Hashemi SR; Kadkhodaei M
J Prosthodont; 2017 Jun; 26(4):289-295. PubMed ID: 26662575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of different implant configurations on biomechanical behavior of full-arch implant-supported mandibular monolithic zirconia fixed prostheses.
Zhong J; Guazzato M; Chen J; Zhang Z; Sun G; Huo X; Liu X; Ahmad R; Li Q
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Feb; 102():103490. PubMed ID: 31877512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Prostheses With Different Prosthetic Materials: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Stress Analysis.
Arinc H
Implant Dent; 2018 Jun; 27(3):303-310. PubMed ID: 29517641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
