181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35049759)
1. Genomic Selection for Milk Production Traits in Xinjiang Brown Cattle.
Zhang M; Luo H; Xu L; Shi Y; Zhou J; Wang D; Zhang X; Huang X; Wang Y
Animals (Basel); 2022 Jan; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 35049759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving the accuracy of genomic evaluation for linear body measurement traits using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in Hanwoo beef cattle.
Naserkheil M; Lee DH; Mehrban H
BMC Genet; 2020 Dec; 21(1):144. PubMed ID: 33267771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short communication: investigation of the feasibility of genomic selection in Icelandic Cattle.
Gautason E; Sahana G; Su G; Benjamínsson BH; Jóhannesson G; Guldbrandtsen B
J Anim Sci; 2021 Jul; 99(7):. PubMed ID: 33942082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genomic Estimated Breeding Value of Milk Performance and Fertility Traits in the Russian Black-and-White Cattle Population.
Sharko FS; Khatib A; Prokhortchouk EB
Acta Naturae; 2022; 14(1):109-122. PubMed ID: 35441049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of a Bayesian model including QTL markers increases prediction reliability when test animals are distant from the reference population.
Ma P; Lund MS; Aamand GP; Su G
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7237-7247. PubMed ID: 31155255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of Genomic Prediction for Milk Production Traits in Philippine Dairy Buffaloes.
Herrera JRV; Flores EB; Duijvesteijn N; Moghaddar N; van der Werf JH
Front Genet; 2021; 12():682576. PubMed ID: 34777455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of fitting dominance and additive effects on accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in layers.
Heidaritabar M; Wolc A; Arango J; Zeng J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Bastiaansen JW; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC
J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Oct; 133(5):334-46. PubMed ID: 27357473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genomic evaluation of Brown Swiss dairy cattle with limited national genotype data and integrated external information.
Luštrek B; Vandenplas J; Gorjanc G; Potočnik K
J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5738-5754. PubMed ID: 33685705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Short communication: Single-step genomic evaluation of milk production traits using multiple-trait random regression model in Chinese Holsteins.
Kang H; Ning C; Zhou L; Zhang S; Yan Q; Liu JF
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Dec; 101(12):11143-11149. PubMed ID: 30268613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multitrait genomic prediction of methane emissions in Danish Holstein cattle.
Manzanilla-Pech CIV; Gordo D; Difford GF; Løvendahl P; Lassen J
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Oct; 103(10):9195-9206. PubMed ID: 32747097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genomic studies of milk-related traits in water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) based on single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction and random regression models.
Lázaro SF; Tonhati H; Oliveira HR; Silva AA; Nascimento AV; Santos DJA; Stefani G; Brito LF
J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5768-5793. PubMed ID: 33685677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of different response variables in genomic prediction using GBLUP and ssGBLUP methods in Iranian Holstein cattle.
Afrazandeh M; Abdolahi-Arpanahi R; Abbasi MA; Kashan NEJ; Torshizi RV
J Dairy Res; 2022 May; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 35604025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effectiveness of genomic selection for milk production traits of Holstein dairy cattle.
Lee YM; Dang CG; Alam MZ; Kim YS; Cho KH; Park KD; Kim JJ
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2020 Mar; 33(3):382-389. PubMed ID: 32054181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genomic predictions can accelerate selection for resistance against Piscirickettsia salmonis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
Bangera R; Correa K; Lhorente JP; Figueroa R; Yáñez JM
BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28143402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison on genomic prediction using pedigree BLUP and single step GBLUP through the Hanwoo full-sib family.
Kim EH; Kang HC; Myung CH; Kim JY; Sun DW; Lee DH; Lee SH; Lim HT
Anim Biosci; 2023 Sep; 36(9):1327-1335. PubMed ID: 37170517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effect of Integrating Genomic Information into Genetic Evaluations of Chinese Merino Sheep.
Wei C; Luo H; Zhao B; Tian K; Huang X; Wang Y; Fu X; Tian Y; Di J; Xu X; Wu W; Tulafu H; Yasen M; Zhang Y; Zhao W
Animals (Basel); 2020 Mar; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 32231053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of single-step genomic evaluation using multiple-trait random regression test-day models in dairy cattle.
Oliveira HR; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Jamrozik J; Brito LF; Silva FF; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2365-2377. PubMed ID: 30638992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genomic prediction based on a joint reference population for the Xinjiang Brown cattle.
Zhang M; Xu L; Lu H; Luo H; Zhou J; Wang D; Zhang X; Huang X; Wang Y
Front Genet; 2024; 15():1394636. PubMed ID: 38737126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
